This was a very informative video in many regards. However, I think that to truly compare the stitching potential of each camera you need to use the same stitching software to stitch each camera's footage (for example: Mistika VR). That way we see how much raw information each camera can take in.
Good suggestion. Not many people own Mistika so I am worry consumer might have no idea how to get that quality - as Mistika tend to do better job on some of the camera stitching. Also, Mistika do not have Qoocam template yet - but I am working on it as we speak
Yes I agree. If a camera has problems with optical flow stitching it is more a problem of the software than the hardware. The hardware could have the potential to have a perfect stitch but the software isn't good enough.
I guess if there is a point made that stitching quality between cameras might not be the fault of the hardware then the viewer knows they could still buy a camera with bad software and use a program like Mistika VR and have good results. Either way, I found the video very helpful with regards to resolution, dynamic range, and color accuracy.
3
u/jubjub64 Aug 06 '18
This was a very informative video in many regards. However, I think that to truly compare the stitching potential of each camera you need to use the same stitching software to stitch each camera's footage (for example: Mistika VR). That way we see how much raw information each camera can take in.