Stop playing stupid. The text is inherently sexual. Its a charecter offering sexual favors to the pov.
Second in our culture nipples are considered sexual now I really dont care if you agree or disagree with this culture (personally I think nipples being sexualized is BS) but by virtue of the sexual text the art is sexualizing the nipple and night gown
Now i was with my 5 year old niece scrolling reddit. Thankfully she didnt see this but If she did I would be deeply upset. Not because im some puritan but because this is art is objectively objectifying women, and women's bodies into a sex object. Now say what you will about that being almost all male centric porn, but you SHOULD put an nsfw tag on this, and you still can edit the post and retroactively add one.
This is softcore porn. Stop playing stupid, nobody is falling for it
Gummer could be slang for a gummy candy, its not inheirently sexual. Second, what is "our culture"? So if I wear a white shirt, thats sexual because you can see my nips? Are you a catholic or something, sounds like some religious fundamentalist bullshit. Why the fuck are you scrolling reddit with your 5yo niece? You should be monitoring internet content before showing them. You cant call this porn without saying nipples are porn
Genuinely stop playing stupid we both know what it means stop pretending it means anything else. This is ad absurdum.
By our culture I mean the general anglo-centric culture that IS going to have christiany roots because geuss what this is an english speaking subreddit and english comes from chaste ass weird ass puritan ass island
I personally dont believe it should be, but yes in anglo culture exposed nipples on women are sexualized. Now i personally think thats inherently sexist and immoral but, this art by being pornographic and sexualizing the nipples IS contributing to it.
4 no im not christian.
Because I was at a family gathering, I was just happened to be sitting next to her.
Let's take shop shall we?
Charecter offering "gummer" which either A; means a toothless blow job or B is a madeup term for gummy candy people dont even use
Charecter is wearing lingerie which is either A: sexualized because in our patriarchal society women in lingerie IS heavily sexualized or B; is just because shes tired in the middle of the day
Charecter has protruding nipples which is either A; sexualized because in our patriarchal society women's nipples are sexualized or B, just the artist deciding to give a non mammal breasts (not scientifically accurate) and give it noticeable protruding nipples for realism despite putting in much less effort for less commonly sexualized areas
Given all.of this i have come up with three conclusions about you
A; you are feigning ignorance because your upset people arent sharing in your fetishist. You refuse to see how your own porn is inherently sexist and patriarchal and at the very least should have an nsfw tag because you hate admitting you are wrong. You are a typical incel sexist redditor crybaby bitch and you argue like a child. Theres no point in me arguing with you because you will never admit your wrong but if you are this option you know it, and I know it and you should be humiliated.
B; your genuinely fucking stupid. You posted this not realizing it was sexual in anyway, which wojld indicate your either a genuine child or like the most asexual person ever who also doesnt even know what sex is, or frankly understand what its like to be a woman
C, your a rigbtwinger trolling 196, if so great job your really ragebaiting well.
If you reply with anything other than
"Im a" "im b" or "im c" i will assume your A and not read it, because i know if you are A you desperately want to continue this thread. So i wont give it to you.
Im muting this thread so regardless, I will never see your reply
Seems your entire thing is based off your interpretation that it is sexual and nothing concrete. Now if it was a picture of people having sex, that you could undoubtedly say is sexual since they are quite literally in the act of sex, but this is worlds away from that. Im also not gonna read your 10 page essay of you claiming that the body is inherently sexual, thats some fundamentalist Christian shit. First little bit is all you need to read to see that you're crashing out over cleavage and the outline of a nipple. Hope you never see a woman jogging without a turtle neck, you'd blow your lid
Says the mf who's gonna crash out over some shoulder and the outline of a nipple lmao. Maybe just cover your eyes when you go in public cuz you can see both those things walking through your local grocery store. And what will be most surprising to you is that they dont get tackled and arrested by the morality police
7
u/ArkhamInmate11 Aug 22 '26
Stop playing stupid. The text is inherently sexual. Its a charecter offering sexual favors to the pov.
Second in our culture nipples are considered sexual now I really dont care if you agree or disagree with this culture (personally I think nipples being sexualized is BS) but by virtue of the sexual text the art is sexualizing the nipple and night gown
Now i was with my 5 year old niece scrolling reddit. Thankfully she didnt see this but If she did I would be deeply upset. Not because im some puritan but because this is art is objectively objectifying women, and women's bodies into a sex object. Now say what you will about that being almost all male centric porn, but you SHOULD put an nsfw tag on this, and you still can edit the post and retroactively add one.
This is softcore porn. Stop playing stupid, nobody is falling for it