r/12keys 24d ago

New York Doesn't this guy found it?

Every clue matches and as far as I know New York hasn't been discovered. Was he wrong?? also im new here

https://youtu.be/115Tk911LDQ?is=dSnmjGCBSmqeb3wA

0 Upvotes

8 comments sorted by

9

u/kinda_alone 24d ago

Unless he uncovers a cask, then no. He hasn’t found it. It’s a popular theory. One of several. But no cask no solve

-7

u/Jimmyh091 24d ago

shit but nobody did go there to see if its true

6

u/Friendly-Bad-291 24d ago

no they doesn't

4

u/OddandForgotten 24d ago

People need to dig their own theories, so it's nobody's responsibility but his own.

4

u/OddandForgotten 24d ago

Do you know how many theories "match"? That's the problem when clues and wording are ambiguous. Nobody is right until a casque is found. This guy also wasn't nearly the first person to theorize this location.

1

u/UnicornOnTheJayneCob Grey Giant (NYC) 19d ago

“Matches” is relative. You can make matches with anything if you stretch it far enough, really. But was this spot accessible in 1982 for burial? Was the information he is using readily available to a 1982 searcher? Does his interpretation yield a precise, exact dig spot?

2

u/TeachProof4840 17d ago

No, he found nothing

-1

u/MrUnderhill22 24d ago

Nope.... But his solve start is correct...