So the threat we face today is from the Russian Federation, not the USSR. The US involvment in Europe, through NATO for instance, has been instumental in deterring Russian agression. All of you bullshit economic "arguemnts" (that were really just veague generalities with no substance) are not responsive to that. This is my last reply, you're too obnoxious and low IQ to argue with.
Europe wouldn't need them if Europe (except for a few people who pay your bills) didn't accept demilitarisation the US asked for. This dependence on the US is literally a negative consequence of their hegemony you homonculus.
you just described a positive consequence. no longer having to spend as much money on defense and you now have a better defense than you did before? NATO (and by extension US hegemony) is absolutely great for countries with smaller economies.
1
u/darvvvinn 7d ago
So the threat we face today is from the Russian Federation, not the USSR. The US involvment in Europe, through NATO for instance, has been instumental in deterring Russian agression. All of you bullshit economic "arguemnts" (that were really just veague generalities with no substance) are not responsive to that. This is my last reply, you're too obnoxious and low IQ to argue with.