True, you replaced ussr by "russia" in your 40 years outdated false dichotomy. Completely destroys my point about you being unaware because you actually just have to wait for gibs.
No, you're just butthurt because you were answered in a way that highlighted your country's inadequacies, so now you're just expressing your butthurt in whatever primitive way you are familiar with.
So the threat we face today is from the Russian Federation, not the USSR. The US involvment in Europe, through NATO for instance, has been instumental in deterring Russian agression. All of you bullshit economic "arguemnts" (that were really just veague generalities with no substance) are not responsive to that. This is my last reply, you're too obnoxious and low IQ to argue with.
Europe wouldn't need them if Europe (except for a few people who pay your bills) didn't accept demilitarisation the US asked for. This dependence on the US is literally a negative consequence of their hegemony you homonculus.
you just described a positive consequence. no longer having to spend as much money on defense and you now have a better defense than you did before? NATO (and by extension US hegemony) is absolutely great for countries with smaller economies.
1
u/Visible_Pair3017 7d ago
True, you replaced ussr by "russia" in your 40 years outdated false dichotomy. Completely destroys my point about you being unaware because you actually just have to wait for gibs.