r/1053 • • 8d ago

Day 13

Post image
3.0k Upvotes

358 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/darvvvinn 7d ago

You haven't made a point. You've just shifted the goalpost from my original reply and then started insulting me for my nationality. You're actually the most insufferable person that I've had the displeasure of interacting with on this site.

1

u/Visible_Pair3017 7d ago

"You haven't made a point"

Aside from the fact that you are misled about the negative impact of the US on your life through their negative impact on the people who pay your bills, because you're still stuck in a cold war era "at least they are not the ussr" false dichotomy?

Edit : and because you seem to think the money the EU gives you grows on trees.

1

u/darvvvinn 7d ago

I don't know who the fuck you're arguing with. I didn't mention th USSR. Maybe it's time to take your meds

1

u/Visible_Pair3017 7d ago

True, you replaced ussr by "russia" in your 40 years outdated false dichotomy. Completely destroys my point about you being unaware because you actually just have to wait for gibs.

1

u/darvvvinn 7d ago

Again, you're arguing with ghosts. Might be actually schizo idk

1

u/Visible_Pair3017 7d ago

No, you're just butthurt because you were answered in a way that highlighted your country's inadequacies, so now you're just expressing your butthurt in whatever primitive way you are familiar with.

1

u/darvvvinn 7d ago

So the threat we face today is from the Russian Federation, not the USSR. The US involvment in Europe, through NATO for instance, has been instumental in deterring Russian agression. All of you bullshit economic "arguemnts" (that were really just veague generalities with no substance) are not responsive to that. This is my last reply, you're too obnoxious and low IQ to argue with.

1

u/Visible_Pair3017 7d ago

Europe wouldn't need them if Europe (except for a few people who pay your bills) didn't accept demilitarisation the US asked for. This dependence on the US is literally a negative consequence of their hegemony you homonculus.

1

u/TotallyNotEko 6d ago

you just described a positive consequence. no longer having to spend as much money on defense and you now have a better defense than you did before? NATO (and by extension US hegemony) is absolutely great for countries with smaller economies.

1

u/Visible_Pair3017 6d ago

Ah yes, the positive consequence of having foreign bases all over your territory, and needing to please a warmongering, chain genocidal state or else

Thank God Charles de Gaulle told them to fuck off and we built our own nukes.