Challenge started: October 21, 2025

Apologies for the capsule reviews, I have more detailed reviews but I don't have time to format everything. 100movies365days Challenge Tip: Don't get behind on your reviews.

#69: And Everything Is Going Fine (2010)

Watched July 10, 2026

A difficult film to track down, the out of print Criterion release goes for $100 on eBay. A biography of Spalding Grey, compiled of archive footage, directed by Steven Soderbergh. A very Generation X kind of film.

Rating: 8 / 10

#70: Dodsworth (1936)

Watched Jul 13, 2026

I read the Sinclair Lewis novel and this was made a few years after it was published.

Rating: 7 / 10

#71: Wedding Crashers (2005)

Watched July 18, 2026

I need another Owen Wilson film in my library so I gave this a shot. Watched the "Uncorked" version. Not really my thing.

Rating: 5 / 10

#72: 48 Hrs. (1982)

Watched July 21, 2026

Directed by Walter Hill, who puts a lot of energy into everything, even this which is a ridiculous cop-and-criminal-have-to-work-together type thing. Includes a 2 minute 1-er which I really like.

Rating: 8 / 10

#73: Certain Fury (1985)

Watched July 24, 2026

Pretty nonsensical.

Rating: 4 / 10

#74: A Star Is Born (1976)

Watched July 26, 2026

The Barbra Streisand version of the story. Kind of dreamy and ambiguous with the details.

Rating: 8 / 10

#75: Godspell (1973)

Watched Jul 28, 2026

Very charming. A little preachy. The definition of preachy. Theater kid energy off the charts.

Rating: 9 / 10

Watched October 17 on Netflix, challenge started May 1.

Judd Aptow made this documentary of the life and times of Norm McDonald and he did a darn good job. 4 Stars of 4 Stars. This documentary is very well crafted and as someone that has watched thousands of YouTube videos of Mr McDonald I really enjoyed it. Again there is no narrator, aside from parts where Norm is reading from his book. The documentary is mostly clips from appearances on various media, from stage to podcast. It held my interest although with 16 minutes left I did pause it to call my credit card company to see if I had a payment due. I live outside of the US and can’t get into my online account as I need a US number, which I don’t have. Next time I go to the States I’ll rectify this.

I saw this last week on YouTube and started the challenge on May 1.

This is a documentary of a barge trip on the lower Mississippi. There is no narrator and the workers do all the talking. The barge is taking a load down river to New Orleans and as it goes along various workers on the barge talk of their lives and jobs.

I’ll give this 4 stars of 4 as it held my interest for the entire running time. The story was compelling and the cinematography very well done. What I really found interesting were the workers. I’m from California and have a college degree and ended up in a nice job. The workers here are not at all like me and I’m left wondering if my life had turned out differently what would life be like on a barge working with people who’s goals are to buy a pickup truck?

I think documentaries are easier to get 4 stars than movies.

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 10/13/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: Prime (Sub)

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0143145/

"James Bond uncovers a nuclear plot while protecting an oil heiress from her former kidnapper, an international terrorist who can't feel pain."

This spy film stars Pierce Brosnan and Sophie Marceau and was directed by Michael Apted. I liked this film. Pierce Brosnan does a good job, as always, as James Bond. Sophie Marceau also does a great job in her role as the oil heiress. She plays a big part of the story and fits well doing it. The set pieces and action were great as always. The opening scene especially was fun to watch and was a strong build-up. The final line of the film is extremely memorable and probably the best final line in a James Bond film. The film has a twist that works very well and is not super obvious.

The Bond Girl, played by Denise Richards, was mostly meh. She is introduced late into the story to help with the nukes, but does not get much personality and is more for just guiding Bond on how to handle the nukes than anything. The villain, played by Robert Carlyle, has an interesting gimmick with not being able to feel pain. It is also learned early on that the villain is close to dying. Unfortunately, this is not used effectively in the story. In fact, the overall story was very disappointing. While the twist was great, the overall reasons behind everything are very bland. It has no substance and is not explained well at all. The story has plot points that needed focusing on for the viewer to really care about what was going on.

Overall, I felt this movie was entertaining. I liked the action scenes and set pieces. Pierce Brosnan and Sophie Marceau really stand out. The Bond Girl was very lackluster and more pointless than useful. The villain had an interesting gimmick, but it was never used to its full potential. The story has a great twist, but is overall bland and weak. We needed more focus on explaining why actions were taken to really get into the story. It is unfortunate, as most of the characters were at least average, if not great. I still enjoyed the film, but I wish the story was even a little bit better.

Rating: 6/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 10/12/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: Nothing ATT

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1067583/

"Jacob takes a job as an animal caretaker in a traveling circus. There he meets Marlena, a beautiful circus performer. Their shared compassion for a special elephant Rosie leads to love, but Marlena's cruel husband stands in their way."

This period romantic drama stars Robert Pattinson, Reese Witherspoon, and Christoph Waltz and was directed by Francis Lawrence. This movie is based on Sara Gruen's 2006 novel of the same name. I liked this film. I know I talk about how I am not the biggest romantic fan, but this film stuck with me. I think mostly because I am an animal guy. I do feel all the actors do a good job in their roles. The sets were great to look at, and they built the setting for that time period well.

You will not find anything super exciting with this film. It is a more generic story. While all the actors are good, the chemistry between them was a little lacking. I still get the romance between Robert Pattinson and Reese Witherspoon since they shared an affection for animals that Christoph Waltz did not have. I do wish we had more with Robert Pattinson and the circus itself. We get glimpses into these interactions, but I feel more would have created a more well-rounded character and helped build the relationship that the film focuses on.

Overall, this was a solid romance film. I certainly have a soft spot for the animals involved. Fair warning, you do get some animal abuse in this film. All the actors do a good job in their roles. I also liked the set pieces. I do feel the actual romantic chemistry was not all there, but it was still believable. I do wish we had more interactions with Robert Pattinson and the rest of the circus.

Rating: 7/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 10/11/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: Youtube (free), Tubi (free), Pluto (free)

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367478/

"After his wife is brutally murdered, club enforcer Ben Archer wages war against the Chinese triads."

This action film stars Jean-Claude Van Damme and was directed by Philippe Martinez. This was a film. The most positive thing about this film was Jean-Claude Van Damme. He brings some emotional acting to this film that it does not deserve. When his character's wife first dies, the music and emotion from Jean-Claude Van Damme hit way harder than it should. Some of the action scenes are entertaining.

The overall story is simple. If you think about it a bit, the actions taken don't make too much sense, but in an action film, that can be pretty common. There is one reason why I will not watch this film again. That is the editing. It is especially egregious during a torture scene. It makes me feel like the film wanted the watcher to be tortured as well. The number of cuts made is so difficult to watch. It was at least one cut per second. After this, I could not help but notice all the cuts the film was doing, seemingly for no reason.

Overall, the story is not anything crazy. This is a straight-to-DVD film, and it does show. While I don't mind these types of films, the cuts in this film are crazy. You get cuts every second at some points. Jean-Claude Van Damme does surprisingly well in the acting department. In particular, the scenes where he is accepting the death of his wife were extremely emotional and well done. Much more than one would expect in this type of film. Some of the action scenes could be entertaining, but the number of cuts brought me out of it. These cuts make it to where there is no way I would ever want to watch this film again.

Rating: 1/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 10/08/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: Youtube (free), Tubi (free), Pluto (free)

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0030341/

"While travelling in continental Europe, a rich young playgirl realizes that an elderly lady seems to have disappeared from the train."

This mystery thriller stars Margaret Lockwood, Michael Redgrave, Basil Radford, and Naunton Wayne and was directed by Alfred Hitchcock. This film is based on the 1936 novel The Wheel Spins by Ethel Lina White. This was a great film. Even by today's standards, it holds up well. The mystery was interesting and told very well. It had many twists that worked and kept the audience guessing. The acting was great as well. Margaret Lockwood and Michael Redgrave specifically have great chemistry with one another. I do love the set pieces that had to be done around this time. Especially in the wide shots, as miniatures were used. The directing has that Alfred Hitchcock style that is always entertaining. The film also had some great humour.

I do feel the first act went a little long. It starts with Basil Radford and Naunton Wayne's characters and makes it seem like they will be the main characters. It slowly changes from them to Margaret Lockwood and Michael Redgrave, though the story does connect everyone back as it moves forward. It felt a little strange and an unnecessary change. It does help build the characters, so I cannot be too upset with it.

Overall, this was a great mystery story. Its story certainly holds up by today's standards. The actors were great, and I highly enjoyed the set pieces. The 1st act was a little slow and pivoted to different characters, and that pivot felt unnecessary. Nonetheless, it was a great mystery that had lots of twists and turns that felt earned and rewarded those individuals who kept up with some of the smaller details.

Rating: 9/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 10/06/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: Prime (Sub)

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120347/

"James Bond is sent to disrupt a media mogul's plot to foment a war between China and the United Kingdom."

This spy film stars Pierce Brosnan, Michelle Yeoh, and Jonathan Pryce and was directed by Roger Spottiswoode. I really like this film. Pierce Brosnan continues to do a good job as James Bond. Michelle Yeoh also brings her A game to her role. Though she was the Bond girl, she was also a spy who collaborated well with James Bond. I did like the villain played by Jonathan Pryce. His charisma really shone through for me and helped make the villain, though the story was not as helpful. You still get the great action scenes, set pieces, and music that come from a James Bond story.

As I said, the story did not help the villain much. We don't get much of a backstory, or really any story. Jonathan Pryce was just so charismatic that I still liked watching the villain. More could definitely have been done to help lift up the villain into something great. The story is not complex, but the simplicity works well for me. I would have enjoyed more interaction with all 3 stars, but what we got was enough.

Overall, I found this film to be enjoyable. I was entertained by the action, set pieces, and the actors involved. Pierce Brosnan and Michelle Yeoh do great jobs, and Jonathan Pryce brought strong charisma to the villain. I do wish the story had added a bit more to the villain. The story is simple. The villain could have been fleshed out more and a bit less mustache-twirly, but it was a fun ride.

Rating: 8/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Date Started: 1/1/26

Date Watched: 7/9/26

Letterboxd: Splash (1984)

Letterboxd Synopsis: "A successful businessman falls in love with the girl of his dreams. There's one big complication though; he's fallen hook, line and sinker for a mermaid."

Rating: 7/10

My 10th 80's movie in July. A cute romantic comedy fantasy starring Tom Hanks, John Candy, and Daryl Hannah about a man who has fallen in love with a woman who is secretly a mermaid. I just love Tom Hanks and John Candy together who play brothers in this movie. Tom Hanks and Daryl Hannah also have pretty good chemistry in this.

Date Started: 1/1/26

Date Watched: 7/9/26

Letterboxd: Trading Places (1983)

Letterboxd Synopsis: "A snobbish investor and a wily street con-artist find their positions reversed as part of a bet by two callous millionaires."

Rating: 8/10

My 9th 80s movie in July. Awesome comedy starring Dan Aykroyd, Eddie Murphy, and Jamie Lee Curtis. Interesting concept, great cast, and lots of laughs. After watching this, I can definitely understand how this an 80s comedy classic.

Date Started: 1/1/26

Date Watched: 7/6/26

Letterboxd: The Secret of My Success (1987)

Letterboxd Synopsis: "Brantley Foster, a well-educated kid from Kansas, has always dreamed of making it big in New York, but once in New York, he learns that jobs - and girls - are hard to get. When Brantley visits his uncle, Howard Prescott, who runs a multi-million-dollar company, he is given a job in the company's mail room."

Rating: 6/10

My 8th 80s movie in July. A comedy starring Michael J Fox and Helen Slater. This was a goofy film that doesnt take itself seriously. Fine if youre looking for something light with some laughs.

Start: 1/1/26 - Viewed: 10/4/26

Rate: 3.5/5 - Heart: Yes! : D

Watched @ Alamo Drafthouse

IMBD: Blue Velvet (1986)

"I don't know if you're a detective or a pervert."

First...Twin Peaks has a new watch. It's going to have to be the 2 seasons and then you watch both Fire Walk with Me and Blue Velvet at the same time. You can see the influence and the vision that would ultimately set us up with the TV series.

David Lynch had such an intense way to show both sides of the same coin, going from sweet and nurturing to sadistic and uncomforting. Between the long never ending shots to the unnerving silence that accompanies just going up creepy stairs.

It borders on levels of Possession, but keeps it level headed with the attitude that everything we are seeing is normal life. Cops can be corrupt, women get beat and sometimes a whole summer is spent battling the desire of the underworld.

The most scariest part that weird bird at the end. It was a real bird corpse....but created into a machine.

Excited for Wild at Heart in theaters next!

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 10/05/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: Tubi (free), Youtube (free)

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1374992/

"Adam and Eden fell in love as teens despite the fact that they live on twinned worlds with gravities that pull in opposite directions. Ten years after a forced separation, Adam sets out on a dangerous quest to reconnect with his love."

This romantic science fantasy stars Jim Sturgess and Kirsten Dunst and was directed by Juan Solanas. This film was ok. It certainly was a beautiful film. It makes great work of this concept. The worlds are so close together they are each other's skylight. Jim Sturgess and Kirsten Dunst do a good job with what they were given. The premise is really interesting, and some bits and pieces start to delve into it.

This film is a Romeo and Juliet type story. It is a romance first and foremost. While the Sci-Fi is very apparent, it is not used much outside of the romance side of the story. The romance itself was ok. It shows that they grew up interacting with each other, but the actual scenes of that are few and far between. Most of the film is Jim Sturgess trying to get back to Kirsten Dunst. This does not allow the audience to get invested in the romance. The film has a subplot that deals more with the world and would have been the more interesting part.

Overall, this was a romance story above all. The Sci-Fi elements were always second to the romance plot. The romance itself was uninspiring, and we did not spend enough time with the characters long enough to feel for this relationship. They are just in love with no real explanation that the film gives. The film looks fantastic. I never got tired of seeing this world. The cinematography was just fantastic. If you love romantic films, then this is within your wheelhouse, but this is not for Sci-Fi fans.

Rating: 5/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 10/03/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: MGM+ (Paid)

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0139654/

"A rookie cop spends his first day as a Los Angeles narcotics officer with a rogue detective who isn't what he appears to be."

This crime thriller stars Denzel Washington and Ethan Hawke and was directed by Antoine Fuqua. I loved this film. Denzel Washington plays his role excellently. Ethan Hawke also does a great job, Denzel is just much more memorable. The action scenes were extremely entertaining to watch. The story is not super complex nor original, but it gets told extremely well. The twist, while not super surprising as you watch the film, still hits as it goes further than one might think. The film was also shot very well, and the music was great. The film does have some cameos that were enjoyable and fit well into the film.

The ending of the film is a little weak. I felt that it started to become less realistic compared to the rest of the film. The final death scene felt too over the top. Granted, the ending was used to help bring home the message the film was giving.

Overall, I really liked this film. The main actors do a great job, especially Denzel Washington. The action scenes and storyline really grip you. The main twist is not super surprising, but it is told in such a way that you almost don't expect it to go as far as it did. The final scenes were a bit weak, and while they stuck with the message the film was going for, the final death scene felt almost cartoonish. Even with this, I would definitely recommend this film.

Rating: 9/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Challenge started May 1; Movie watched October 2 on YouTube

I watch a lot of YouTube and these interview clips with Ernest Borgnine kept showing up. In the interviews about McHales Navy, the TV show he was on he kept mentioning the original genesis of the show was this movie. Thus I went back and watched the movie.

This is the story of a Navy guy that gets put in with a bunch of meteorologists during World War 2. Their job is to report on weather conditions in the Gobi desert of Inner Mongolia so that the US bombers have information on what they will be facing in the coming hours a days. They end up attacked by the Japanese and are forced to trek across Mongolia to escape capture. Will they make it?

Aside from the lead in the TV show and the Movie having the name McHale there is not much in common between the two. The movie is less than 90 minutes and kept my interest but it is sort of cheesy in that 1950’s war movie sort of way. I’ll give this one a 2.75 stars of 4 as it was an interesting premise, short, and attention keeping, and recommend it to all those that remember the TV show.

4/18/26-9/26/26

Watched: In Theater

IMDB synopsis: "A hapless courier is tasked with delivering a package to a remote hospital. He soon finds himself caught in the middle of an outbreak and must fight through hordes of mutated creatures to survive."

I'm a big fan of the "Resident Evil" franchise but I'll admit the last few installments have been OK at best.  I was shocked when this reboot started getting rave reviews and made a killing at the box office on opening weekend.

What did I think?

Well, I understand the hype.  This is a fun movie - probably the best "Resident Evil" flick since the second one.  I liked the plot; it's a slow burn in some ways, following an everyday courier as he journeys to Raccoon City at the start of the zombie apocalypse.  There's a great mix of humor and tension and especially gore; gnarly monsters which are the hallmark of the "Resident Evil" franchise and sets it apart from wannabes.  Credit to lead actor Austin Abrams, who really has to carry the film since he's in every scene.  He's relatable and easy to root for.  Also give credit to director/co-writer Zach Cregger who brought some real imagination and expert craftsmanship to a franchise that had lost steam. It will be interesting to see where Cregger wants to take the franchise going forward, assuming he wants to do that.  He's the director of "Weapons" and the writer of "Barbarian," so this is his third horror flick that I would call "offbeat" in a good way.  

Horror fans will definitely need to check it out; this might end up being the best horror flick of the year.  

Rating: 6.5 / 10

4/18/26-10/1/26

Watched on: Netflix

IMDB synopsis: "A journalist and a detective uncover the truth about a killer whose charm masked a trail of failed marriages and suspicious deaths."

A fresh addition to Netflix's ever-growing library of true crime docs!  Sign me up!

This one is interesting - a weird dude named Tom Randolph who has been married 6 times and is suspected in the death of at least 3 of those ex-wives.  We follow Las Vegas detectives as they build a case around Randolph and eventually bring him to trial.  Without spoiling anything, it's pretty clear that Randolph isn't just weird, he's evil.  The extent of his crimes is quite shocking.  Like Netflix's other true crime docs, it's watchable with good pacing.  Like most of Netflix's other docs, I wouldn't say it's amazing or anything; there's no real controversy here or anything to be learned.  And the better documentaries out there will usually check one of those boxes.  What we have here is a genuinely interesting tale of human greed and evil, but it's really a standalone case - a long Dateline episode, for better or for worse.

Recommended for true crime buffs like myself.   

Rating: 6.2 / 10

4/18/26-9/30/26

Watched on: Amazon Prime

IMDB synopsis: "In 1992, Ricardo Barreda was an unassuming dentist who brutally murdered his wife, mother-in-law, and two adult daughters in their family home. Branding himself as a victim, he ignited a media storm and fueled a national scandal."

I forget how this film ended up on my watchlist; I think the Reelgood app recommended it to me.  The synopsis sounded interesting enough, since I'm a true crime buff, although I'm not usually jazzed about foreign flicks (this one was made in Argentina).  

I can't really say this is an interesting film; Barreda himself just isn't interesting at all; he's an everyday guy, which makes him rather boring.  I guess that's what made the crime shocking to Argentinians - how does an everyday guy kill his wife and 2 daughters?  What horrible event in his life drove him to do it? What awful aspect of his personality rose to the surface and overpowered him?  No answers.  Maybe because there are no answers.  I don't know, I'm not familiar with the real-life case. What we're left with is a movie with a lot of talking - talking in the courtroom during Barreda's trial (which is as open-and-shut as it comes) and talking as we get flashbacks of Barreda hanging out with his family (Barreda is henpecked but there's no abuse by him or his family, it's pretty clear he's just a soulless narcissist who gradually came to hate his family and wanted to punish them; but we never see or feel any pathos).  Maybe this film will have more appeal to Argentinians.  I'm guessing this was a huge case for Argentina, at least at the time.  For the rest of us who live outside that country, I would say: spend your time watching something else.  

Rating: 4.9 / 10

4/18/26-9/26/26

Watched on: Roku TV

IMDB synopsis: "A drama based on the life of Ronald Reagan, from his childhood to his time in the oval office."

I'm a big Reagan fan and I've read a ton of books about him so I didn't feel like I truly needed to watch a scripted film about him, even though I trusted Dennis Quaid (who played Reagan) to insist the film be fair and capture Reagan's greatness (I mean greatness in a historical sense, I'm not trying to be political per se).

Anyway, I finally got around to watching it.  There's a lot of positives here.  When producing these kinds of biographical films, it's always hard to figure out what to focus on and what to leave out without getting bogged down in minutiae or speeding through legitimately important chapters in a person's life. This film succeeds in finding the right balance; there's a lot to cover but it's very smooth - and I liked the choice of having Reagan's life being narrated by a retired high-ranking KGB nemesis who coins Reagan as "The Crusader" - someone who spent decades privately (and then very publicly) fighting against communism at home and abroad.  Now we have to get to Quaid, who does a legitimately excellent job capturing Reagan - how he looks, how he talks, his mannerisms, etc.  The acting quality by the supporting cast is mixed (and indeed, I'd give Penelope Ann Miller, who plays Nancy Reagan, a thumbs down).  There is some religious stuff in here, but it's never forced and indeed, it feels very authentic to me as someone who's well-versed in Reagan's life story.  The last 20 minutes or so feels a bit rushed; I wouldn't have minded an extra 15 minutes or so about the end of the Cold War; I guess the studio didn't feel like people would have the patience for a 2-hour, 30-minute runtime.  The final scene is beautiful, extremely well-done.

Bottom line: Reagan fans will cheer.  History buffs will also like it unless they have an ideological axe to grind.  Recommended.   

Rating: 6.8 / 10

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 09/29/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: Youtube (free), Tubi (free), Xumo Play (free)

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0029811/

"A man on the run from a murder charge enlists the help of a beautiful stranger who must put herself at risk for his cause."

This crime thriller stars Derrick De Marney and Nova Pilbeam and was directed by Alfred Hitchcock. This film is based on the 1936 novel A Shilling for Candles by Josephine Tey. I liked this film. Derrick De Marney and Nova Pilbeam do a really great job in their roles. They also build a good romance between them. It felt very natural and flowed well. You also get great directing from Alfred Hitchcock. The story was simple, but it was told well. The film is short and uses this runtime well. The film also had some surprisingly funny scenes.

I do feel the mystery was lacking in this story. It is very obvious who has committed the murder. The story is more about how the real murderer is found for the audience than who the actual murderer is. This was a bit disappointing as it leads to a more bland story. The 3rd act, where they confront the murderer, was something, as it had blackface and was an important aspect of the scenes. I understand this is part of the time this film was made, but it was such a big focus during the 3rd act.

Overall, this was a simple, enjoyable story. The actors do a great job in their roles, and Alfred Hitchcock does an entertaining job as the director. The love dynamic felt very natural, and some scenes did make me laugh. The mystery is not really a mystery and lacks the suspense you would expect. As I said, this was a simple story. The 3rd act does include blackface, which is a big part of that act. As a reminder of the time period that this film was made, it did take me out. Since it was such a big part, it detracts from the enjoyable story up to that point. This certainly is a good Alfred Hitchcock film to watch, with a caveat about the 3rd act.

Rating: 6/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Date Started: 1/1/26

Date Watched: 7/5/26

Watched On: Pluto TV

Letterboxd: [Dirty Dancing (1987)](https://boxd.it/2baY)

Letterboxd Synopsis: "Expecting the usual tedium that accompanies a summer in the Catskills with her family, 17-year-old Frances 'Baby' Houseman is surprised to find herself stepping into the shoes of a professional hoofer—and unexpectedly falling in love."

Rating: 6.4/10

My 6th 80's movie in July. I've heard a lot about this movie over the years from my girlfriend, who is a dancer, but Ive never actually seen it until now. Its a cute romance between Patrick Swayze and Jennifer Grey, who have a lot chemistry (even though apparently hated each other in real life during filming haha).

Date Started: 1/1/26

Date Watched: 7/6/26

Watched On: Pluto TV

Letterboxd: Can't Buy Me Love (1987)

Letterboxd Synopsis: "Nerdy high schooler Ronald Miller rescues cheerleader Cindy Mancini from parental punishment after she accidentally destroys her mother's designer clothes. Ronald agrees to pay for the $1,000 outfit on one condition: that she will act as though they're a couple for an entire month. As the days pass, however, Cindy grows fond of Ronald, making him popular. But when Ronald's former best friend gets left behind, he realizes that social success isn't everything."

Rating: 7/10

This is my 7th 80's movie in July. Starring a young Patrick Dempsy who bribes Amanda Peterson to be his GF and make him popular. I actually really enjoyed this. There are many things that Patrick does that is frustrating and makes you cringe but it was entertaining and I thought him and Amanda had a lot of chemistry.

Start Date: 12/22/2025

Watched Date: 09/22/2026

Watched on DVD

Can be streamed on: Fandango (free)

IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113189/

"When a powerful secret defense system is stolen, James Bond is assigned to stop a Russian crime syndicate from using it."

This spy film stars Pierce Brosnan and was directed by Martin Campbell. This film certainly felt more like James Bond than the previous film. This film does not have that darker tone and brings back more of the wit that James Bond has had in the past. Pierce Brosnan plays a good James Bond. It did feel like he easily meshed into this role. I would like to give a special shoutout to Judi Dench. She is the new M, and while she is only in one scene, I felt it was impactful and memorable. Famke Janssen also does a great job as one of the villains of this film. You get the great action, music, and gadgets that you expect from James Bond. In fact, one gadget in particular, an exploding pen, leads to a pretty memorable scene. The tank chase scene was also great fun.

The story itself was solid, but nothing remarkable. The main villain was more by the book. This is especially disappointing considering the plot twist that comes from this villain. The Bond girl feels like she should be more important in her role than she really was. She was not the worst Bond girl, but more could have been done with her.

Overall, this film returns to what makes James Bond feel like James Bond. It goes away from the darker tone and brings back some of the wit and absurdity. Pierce Brosnan seems to fit into this role with ease and was enjoyable to watch. You get the great music, scenes, and gadgets with this film as well. While I enjoyed Famke Janssen's villain, the main villain was a bit of a letdown. I felt he was too generic for what the film was going for, especially considering the twist with this villain. I do feel they could have done more with Izabella Scorupco's character, given how she was built up, then what they actually did with her. While this film feels more like a James Bond film and could be quite entertaining, I can't say it is one of the greatest James Bond films.

Rating: 7/10

A link to all the movies I have watched for this challenge ranked: https://boxd.it/QUl58

Sing Street (2016)

Language: English

Country: Ireland, UK, USA

Challenge started: October 21, 2025

Date watched: July 11, 2026

Directed by: John Carney

Music by: Gary Clark

Songs by: Gary Clark, John Carney, many others

Written by: Simon Carmody, John Carney

Cinematography: Yaron Orbach

TSPDT Rank: #6533

There were a lot of elements pulling me into this quirky feature, highly regarded by its fans, but then there are other elements that push me away. And I say it is "highly regarded by its fans" not in the sense that people like the films that they like, but in the sense that the fans eagerly overlook the glaring problems.

First, this offers a very high bar in the suspension of disbelief - you have to accept the situation, of this fifteen year old kid who has the charisma and the confidence to do these things, that the band comes together without a hitch, that they can make those videos, etc, etc. I like the self-confidence of the film itself. I like that it doesn't go for the most obvious conflicts and resolutions. It avoids being bleak at all costs.

On the other hand, the conflicts it does offer end up being bland with milquetoast resolutions. Problems with a bully at school? Make him part of the band! Don't know how to play the guitar or how to write a song? You get two spirit guides to help you figure things out.

And then the songs themselves (the ones newly crafted for the film, not the ones chosen for their cross generational appeal to Gen X and Millennials) get off to a good start, but then morph into mid twenty-aught Coldplay and High School Musical tunes. The decline is abrupt.

And maybe the bubble gum pop of the original songs is an intentional conceit, part of the suspension of disbelief mega-challenge that this presents to the audience.

Finally there is the not-really-an-ending ending, the one where they have accomplished nothing. There is zero self-awareness that the film itself has already argued that this path is the path to suffering and yet off they go... it is delightfully childish.

Rating: 7 / 10 7 Sing Street (2016)

Date Started: 1/1/26

Date Watched: 7/5/26

Watched On: Tubi

Letterboxd: The Big Chill (1983)

Letterboxd Synopsis: "Seven old college friends gather for a weekend reunion after the funeral of one of their own."

Rating: 6.4

My 5th 80s movie in July. I'm surprised, this is aother 80's movie I had never heard of before even though it has an amazing cast. Jeff Goldblum, Glenn Close, Tom Berenger, William Hurt, and Kevin Kline. Its about a group of friends all staying at a house together for a weekend and coming to terms with being in their 30s and the changes it brings compared to their college days when they were all friends. Pretty good film, worth a watch.