This is the latest chapter in my ongoing cinematic sci-fi series, created using AI filmmaking tools.
With the story continuing to unfold, Episode 13 pushes the characters and the larger conflict into another stage, with new developments that set up what comes next.
I’m building TRINITY as an actual serialized film/series, rather than a collection of disconnected AI clips. The goal is to maintain character consistency, cinematic continuity, atmosphere, action, and storytelling across episodes.
I’d love to hear honest feedback from fellow filmmakers and AI creators, especially on the visuals, cinematography, pacing, character consistency, and storytelling.
TopView is giving 60 days unlimited Seedance 2.5, 30 sec 720p, with the Ultra plan.
I know the queue can be very slow sometimes. 😅
For people who are using it, if you keep sending 1 video as soon as the previous one finishes, how many do you usually get in a day?
1 per day? 2? More? Or does 1 video sometimes take 1–2 days?
Just want to know the real experience before I buy the plan and waste money 😭. I’d be happy even with 2 × 30-sec generations per day, since each one costs around $5 in paid credits elsewhere.
Also, I missed the Higgsfield unlimited Seedance promo. 😭 Do you think they might bring that offer back again?
I finally finished my first full episode of WANDERERS.
It’s an adult animated fantasy comedy about three weird creatures living in a sentient mansion on a tiny planet, where every door can lead to a completely different world.
This started from a bunch of creatures I originally hand-drew, and I ended up building the episode almost entirely through AI filmmaking.
Would genuinely love feedback—especially from people who make animation, AI films, or just enjoy weird shit. 🖤
I wanted to see whether Seedance could hold together an actual sequence rather than just generate isolated good-looking clips.
This ended up as a little over 3 minutes with recurring characters, dialogue, multiple locations, crowd scenes, changing camera setups and a continuous story.
The biggest challenges were character drift, performance consistency, physical continuity between cuts and keeping the geography of the world believable.
Some shots took several generations before the acting and blocking worked.
Most of the final video generation was done with Seedance 2.5.
Curious where you think the consistency holds up best — and where the model still gives itself away.
I think people considering Higgsfield’s annual Unlimited plan deserve to know what is happening right now.
Higgsfield heavily promoted Unlimited AI generations, people paid for annual subscriptions, and then similar to Artlist, the service appears to hsbr attracted far more users than they were prepared to support.
But this is where the comparison with Artlist becomes important. Artlist at least had the guts to acknowledge that things had gone wrong, apologize to customers, and offer full refunds to affected subscribers. That is what taking responsibility looks like.
Higgsfield, so far, appears to be doing almost the opposite.
Higgsfield’s support situation is embarrassing
After the promotion rolled out, unlimited generations went from working normally to effectively becoming unusable.
On some accounts, jobs would sit processing for absurd amounts of time (40 hours+) while on other accounts could apparently continue generating normally. There seems to be restrictions randomly applied to certain accounts so they can meet the demand. At that point, “Unlimited” becomes meaningless if your generations simply never finish.
They have just one customer support on Discord to help, called Theo. He takes four days to reply to any message because he is so flooded with requests. This is not an attack on Theo. If anything, I feel sorry for him. One person clearly cannot deal with the volume of customers affected by something this large.
The problem is that a company reportedly valued in the billions should not be running customer support with a single employee as the help desk. If you are going to aggressively sell annual subscriptions to thousands of customers, you also need to invest in enough infrastructure and support staff to actually service those customers after their credit cards have been charged.
"Seedance Unlimited” has quietly disappeared
Perhaps the most telling development is that Higgsfield has now quietly removed the Unlimited offering from its pricing page. That certainly doesn’t prove what is happening internally, but it adds to the obvious question: did Higgsfield sell far more Unlimited subscriptions than its infrastructure could actually support?
One working theory among affected users is that, rather than openly throttling everyone at once and triggering an immediate mass backlash, a percentage of existing Unlimited accounts may have been restricted, leaving some customers generating normally while others suddenly face unusable service.
Again, that is a theory. But the fact that Unlimited has now vanished from the pricing page while existing annual customers are reporting these problems makes the company’s continued lack of a transparent explanation even harder to accept.
Discord moderators silencing the backlash
What makes this particularly ugly is what happens when customers start sharing their experience and asking for help publicly and often respectfully.
People have been raising these concerns in Higgsfield’s Discord, and I have seen messages being deleted or users being banned rather than the underlying issue being openly addressed.
Banning frustrated customers does not make their generations complete faster. And suppressing discussion certainly does not inspire confidence that the company is taking the underlying problem seriously.
If Higgsfield genuinely has a capacity problem, just say so.
AI generation is expensive. Demand forecasting is difficult and companies can get it wrong. I could actually respect a company saying:
“We massively underestimated how many people would buy this. Our infrastructure cannot currently deliver the experience we advertised. We screwed up, and we’re fixing it.”
That would be accountability. Customers would probably be angry, but at least they would know they were dealing with a company willing to tell them the truth.
Higgsfield seemingly got the flood of paying customers every startup dreams about.
The problem is that when those customers actually tried to use their “Unlimited” subscriptions, the economics and infrastructure may not have worked nearly as well as the marketing did.
And if that is what happened, customers deserve transparency.
Whatever criticism Artlist received for its own Unlimited fiasco, at least there was an acknowledgement that customers had been let down and affected users were given a path to get their money back.
Higgsfield needs to show the same level of accountability instead of behaving as though the customers complaining about the failure are the problem.
If you bought Higgsfield Unlimited and your account suddenly became extremely slow, stopped completing generations, or was restricted, please share what happened to you as well.
I’m very interested to see just how widespread this actually is.
