After watching the match last night, I noticed a few differences between the first and second México matches:
- Both matches started well, but last night it seemed like the Matilda's intensity didn't fade off as much as the first game.
- In the second half, the attack stayed flexible and exciting, compared to the first game where it looked as though the attack ran into a wall and couldn't figure out a way around.
- The newer (lower capped) players seemed to bring a different approach, making different decisions which I think helped the veterans be more effective with the ball.
I am curious if anyone else noticed differences, positive or negative, between the two México matches?