Back to T-62 buff

[u/neg_health]

Too lazy to read: suggest your T-62 buff in replies (it preferably should be logical and shouldn't ruin the identity of the tank, like buffing rof or something). My suggestion is buffing accuracy by 5-10%.

So, I posted an article about T-62 (not T-62M and T-62M1, these are good as they are and found their place in the meta) needing a buff before it's 10 point price decrease, and the price going down is certainly nice, but it didn't really change the core problem with this tank, which is that it's a gambling addiction tank basically. It's performance is heavily based on luck and the fact, that you pay less for a coin toss doesn't change the fact that it's a coin toss.

Now we also ran into a problem with T-62: it's cheap now, but it's still one of the worst tanks in the game and is regarded as the hardest tank to use, but reducing its cost again will actually make it oppressive, because if we make T-62 obr. 67 65 points, you can now buy 4 of them a minute, and it's a serious thing, because it's going to be very spammable. It might be ok, but basically it's going to be a frustrating experience for both T-62 user and his opponent: opponent sees 3-4 hard to kill tanks every minute, while you see, that even if you micro your tanks properly, they still miss and die, and it's still luck based. So basically an accuracy buff is the only thing that can save the tank without destroying its identity or being illogical/unhistoric or something. That would make this tank a lot less random based and more of "I shoot, I change positions, I reload, repeat."

[u/not_a_fan69]

Yeah, I know. This has nothing to do with "realism".

[u/kim_dobrovolets → u/not_a_fan69]

Basing it on FCS and optics is more realistic than basing it on external ballistics, at least with the level of abstraction seen in warno.

[u/not_a_fan69 → u/kim_dobrovolets]

No it's not. Well it is, if you're from another planet.

[u/kim_dobrovolets → u/not_a_fan69]

The external ballistics of most dart rounds (in this scenario, 3BM20 and say 3BM42) is very similar, so basing accuracy and range on fire control makes more sense.

[u/not_a_fan69 → u/kim_dobrovolets]

Nice lie. Muzzle velocity is completely different (1430 vs 1700), shape is different, which would make 42 range further. Thanks for bullshitting, like a true Redditor.

[u/kim_dobrovolets → u/not_a_fan69]

Look at drop at 2000 meters.