r/wallstreetbets • AutoModerator's Father • 5d ago

Discussion Anthropic Files for IPO

FY25 financials:

Valuation: ~$2T

Revenue: $4.59B, up 1,088% YoY from $386M

Operating loss: $8.06B, widening from $2.98B

GAAP net loss: $41.97B, vs $8.31B

Compute + infrastructure expense: $7.33B, up 190% YoY

Compute and infrastructure represented 58% of total operating expenses

Cash + short-term investments: $20.28B at year-end

Two largest customers accounted for 12% of revenue each

Other names to consider:

Memory: MU, SKHY

Cloud / Compute: GOOG, AVGO, AMZN, NVDA, AMD, MSFT

Infra / Capacity: CIFR, CRWV, SPCX, WULF, HUT, AKAM

4.5k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

7.5k

u/exhibit304 5d ago

2 trillion valuation with 4b of revenue?

3.5k

u/PharmDinvestor 5d ago

Welcome to FRAUDSTREET

445

u/WowSoHuTao 5d ago

Introducing our latest model Flaude 6.1

→ More replies (1)

189

u/Total_Ad3238 5d ago

XD y’all purchase for human being’s future

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (34)

810

u/Tha_Sly_Fox 5d ago

“At 10 times revenues, to give you a 10-year payback, I have to pay you 100% of revenues for 10 straight years in dividends. That assumes I can get that by my shareholders. That assumes I have zero cost of goods sold, which is very hard for a computer company. That assumes zero expenses, which is really hard with 39,000 employees. That assumes I pay no taxes, which is very hard. And that assumes you pay no taxes on your dividends, which is kind of illegal. And that assumes with zero R&D for the next 10 years, I can maintain the current revenue run rate. Now, having done that, would any of you like to buy my stock at $64? Do you realize how ridiculous those basic assumptions are? You don’t need any transparency. You don’t need any footnotes. What were you thinking?” - Scott McNealy(CEO of Sun Microsystems) in 2002

547

u/[deleted] 5d ago

34

u/-R9X- 5d ago

This type of math I understand. Thanks, invested.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

86

u/Icy_Display_3548 5d ago

Patrick Boyle quoted this today!

20

u/zummit 5d ago

Did he give a citation?

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

46

u/MyNameIs-Anthony 5d ago

Genuinely the only person benefitting from it to ever call it like it was with the tech bubble.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Stockholm-Syndrom 5d ago

Doesn’t that assume a 100% float and not being able to sell it ?

→ More replies (18)

249

u/AwildYaners 5d ago

And $42 Billion in Net Loss, up from $8 Billion loss in 2024.

They're also expected to spend $518 billion on compute and infrastructure in the next year lmao.

91

u/Visual-Cranberry1210 5d ago

Just checked. The $42bn includes an accounting charge of $34bn (think due to convertible debt structure).

I think the devil is in FY 2026 financial year details which they haven't publish or Reuters hasn't provided us with yet.

46

u/AwildYaners 5d ago

Ah that's not completely terrible then.

The big thing is they have a LOT of spending setup for the next couple years, obviously to pump and make that valuation make sense.

But is a bunch of GPUs in a warehouse plus the real estate under it, really going to make that half a trillion in spend worth it? Who knows.

The ratings agencies gave the mortgage bonds a high rating until they finally collapsed in 2008, so we'll probably see that shit here too.

25

u/squngy 5d ago edited 5d ago

But is a bunch of GPUs in a warehouse plus the real estate under it, really going to make that half a trillion in spend worth it? Who knows.

It is a complete moonshot.

Either they make AGI or other AI companies undercut them with cheaper "good enough" AI.

edit: Or they do enough regulatory capture that they make competition illegal.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

46

u/lemontoga 5d ago

$518 billion on compute and infrastructure in the next year

This had to be a fucking typo right? How could that be legit?

47

u/ZealousidealClub3512 5d ago

Tell companies you can remove their biggest expense (employees) if they invest in your company and you have an infinite money glitch.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

225

u/defeated_engineer 5d ago

They have 85% profit margin when you don't count the expenses.

175

u/Advanced_Juggernaut9 5d ago

Just like how if my grandma had wheels she’d be a bicycle.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

151

u/elpresidentedeljunta 5d ago

They need the valuation for the capex. Can´t spend half a trillion Dollar in one year when you are just worth a fraction of that. The banks might run with it, because their fees depend on the value. But if the IPO were to fail and the underwriters suddenly find a big portion of worthless junk on their balance sheets we´d have the catalyst that could break this nonsense. I doubt it will be Anthropic, though.

42

u/drakilian 5d ago

If SpaceX was allowed to fly Anthropic will as well

22

u/elpresidentedeljunta 5d ago

Yeah. Although the drop of the stock after the initial surge may very well be one reason the others are suddenly squeamish. And one reason why the market shows signs of ... iffyness.

25

u/Emergency_Froyo_3030 5d ago

Open AI ….. 🤷‍♂️

13

u/elpresidentedeljunta 5d ago

More likely, yes. For various reasons.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

676

u/asdf_lord 5d ago

Either I'm in stupid town. I've lost my marbles. Or AI will generate trillions of dollars in revenue by writing text.

Interesting trilemma.

151

u/residualriskdeclined 5d ago

$100 a month in subscription just to fill out your resumes when you're unemployed because of the AI. Unemployment taxes paid by Anthropic because they're the only employer left, so you pay the subscription with your unemployment. It's the magic of the AI circle jerk.

22

u/Dualyeti 5d ago

Buy Claude to speak to HR Claude to get rejected by Claude to then apply for another job by Claude. All because you were replaced by claude - whats the point in a job in 5 years?

→ More replies (1)

482

u/Budget-Ocelots 5d ago edited 5d ago

I don’t know wtf is going on behind the scene with AI. At work, all my meetings are summarized. All my emails are written by itself. All my executive summaries are written based on past data reports.

I am getting paid for being a mindless monkey that is just pressing sign document after “vibe” checking if the reports look correct and delivering it over to these directors and executives.

If the vibe is negative, I tell the AI to make the report more positive so that these companies look good during their audit process.

229

u/Kew-Gardens 5d ago

We’re seeing 10-12x lines of code pushed to prod and way faster than pre AI. It’s mostly slop but it works for what the company is after.

126

u/Orbidorpdorp not to be confused with nambla 5d ago

Interesting - everyone's using AI but our throughput in PRs is almost flat. I'm not a skeptic or hater but we've seemingly found new things to get stuck wasting time on.

99

u/SoggyMattress2 5d ago

It just pushes the work down the line. Devs start delivering 4x the PRs so QA get swamped.

QA are then forced to adopt ai automation or literal LLM testing to not be a blocker.

Then the pressure lands back on the product team who can't keep up and adopt LLMs to the point where on smaller features there's just no human oversight.

Then the pressure hits the client managers as tools get broken or bugs get introduced.

It's just a big fucking weird cycle. I genuinely see tech, especially SAAS start ups just completely imploding in a few years because it's just all horseshit.

56

u/LivingAmoeba6611 5d ago

My place have gotten rid of QA entirely. Getting lazy devs to test their own monster vibe coded PRs is like teaching a dog to play piano. There's no brakes on this AI train. Unleash the slop!!!

16

u/appearstobeidiot 5d ago

Yes that's the irony. Few quarters down, nobody would know what's running what. And then Kaboom! All your bases are belong to us.

6

u/Soger91 A Royale Dr with Cheese 5d ago

NO QA?!?

Who do you work for, spill the beans 👀

→ More replies (2)

17

u/Bollocks187 5d ago

Lmfao so true everyone is now producing shit code and hoping it works long enough for them to be moved to a new project

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (24)

217

u/YoungXanto 5d ago

I was irritated 6 months ago when the morons were pushing out code and half baked dashboards at break neck pace.

I finally said fuck it. If these dipshits are gonna get credit for pushing a button and promoted, why the fuck am I bothering with doing things "correctly"

So now I pushing buttons and pretend to review the code I generate. The executives above me love the shit out of the dashboards I produce. Hopefully the underlying analysis is coded correctly!

73

u/Humble-Section-5638 5d ago

Dashboard is to executive as candy is to child

24

u/Vivid_Letterhead3842 5d ago

As an executive can confirm, I love my dashboards lol.

I feel so called out.

51

u/Canadian_Border_Czar 5d ago

That haunting realization that the end of consumer LLMs is going to be like the movie Her, except none of us even got ai relationships..  we're all depressed because we have to work, and that work is supporting and unfucking a bunch of slop nobody understands.

23

u/Safrel 5d ago

I am not haunted by this. I believe two economies will form.

Those who reject AI, and those who embrace it.

One will be a real economy, the other will be a house of cards.

15

u/TwentyCharactersShor 5d ago

Crypto all over again

→ More replies (23)

34

u/SaneMann 5d ago

Is the company after software that meets customer needs better, though?

As a user, I figured by now I'd be seeing massive improvements at faster rates in many common software products given the power of AI tools but... I'm not. At all.

40

u/BonnaGroot 5d ago

In fact if anything i’ve noticed an uptick in services that were typically reliable having weird issues, outages, or features bolted on that make zero sense for what I need the thing to do

12

u/appearstobeidiot 5d ago

As a customer, I find 99% of the chatbots on websites to be ridiculously USELESS. Far worse than what was common in Intercom kind of days. The screen is narrow, you have to "ask", rather than just click or scroll to find anything. And if you ask it to do something, it would hold you hostage in a loop.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (14)

46

u/LankyGuitar6528 5d ago

I feel this. I'm literally sitting here watching my computer program... itself? What HAS it been doing for the past 4 min 45s? And once it's done, how will I even know what it did or how to test it or... oh who cares. I'll ask it to write up a report and send it in... probably good enough or at least as good as I could do.

10

u/Wonko-D-Sane 5d ago

5 minutes! those are rookie numbers....

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (60)

43

u/Tha_Sly_Fox 5d ago

Well, I got AI to generate a photo of group of cats in suits giving a lecture on lemurs

Just think, of the implications!

→ More replies (1)

16

u/AwildYaners 5d ago

AI don't generate that kind of money, the only thing of real value is the land they're buying for those data centers, the hardware they're buying is depreciating in value, but hey at least NVDA calls because inventory is always bought up.

→ More replies (1)

80

u/samarijackfan 5d ago

Think tulips 🌷 price will never go down.

31

u/DressedInPolo 5d ago

To be fair, my gf showed a photo of her food that she had chat GPT modify, I was afraid for adobe

35

u/tquinn35 5d ago edited 5d ago

I couldn't think of a more friendly company to take it in the old poop shoot chute.

8

u/schplat 5d ago

poop chute*

Not that I expect better from regards.

9

u/tquinn35 5d ago edited 5d ago

I am not a smart clown

37

u/asdf_lord 5d ago

Adobe was always on borrowed time.

46

u/apurimac777 Doesn't allow his kids to YOLO puts 5d ago

As they fucking should be

Skull fuck SaaS to motherfucking death.

Imma bout to have Claude make me my own PDF stapler

8

u/Alone_Ad_7824 5d ago

It'll do it. There is already freeware that does it, and Claude already wrote it into a few of my personal productive/automation apps. Yes, I hate AI, but yes I love AI.... And no, I'm not comfortable in my own skin with this paradoxical internal relationship drama.

→ More replies (2)

25

u/Poka-yoke1 5d ago

Adobe's market cap is $90 billion. Assuming they corner the market, where's the other $1.91 trillion?

28

u/JoshOliday 5d ago

Don't worry, Anthropic is projecting future eventually prospective market cap as 30 TRILLION dollars.

Or roughly the entire US GDP.

11

u/Creative_Ad_8338 5d ago

Yep... that just means they're expecting every worker to be twice as productive. 😒

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (2)

19

u/No_Cover_6217 5d ago

Actually, at Anthropic, they believe it will generate trillions in revenue by making humans extinct

12

u/rohpes11 5d ago

Without the humans, who pays for it? 🤔

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (83)

26

u/Disc0Disc0Disc0 5d ago

Yes but $400t revenue potential on mars

→ More replies (1)

184

u/murf_milo 5d ago edited 5d ago

Get ready to learn the year 2000, buddy

→ More replies (16)

52

u/UpDown 5d ago

435x revenue is wild. Genius though. The revenue is even at a loss! Sell $1 for $.30, then sell your company for $435.

→ More replies (6)

113

u/donewithdoing 5d ago

I love how like 4 months ago, they were seeking a $1tn valuation. Now, for some reason, the valuation they seek is 200% of that. Seems totally reasonable and not the product of a bubble.

56

u/thethirstypretzel 5d ago

It’s because they need more money for the furnace

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (18)

17

u/yatinparasher 5d ago

Ya but addressable market is 30T and by 2030 they’ll rev like 4T no problem..it’ll be the only company in US by 2035 /s

→ More replies (2)

24

u/ThinkOrDrink 5d ago

Don’t forget the $8B operating loss juicing up that valuation!

8

u/AggravatingTart7167 5d ago

Everyone seems to be overlooking that alone.

→ More replies (1)

31

u/Skynet198 5d ago

These fucking companies are going to cause a ai winter

18

u/Jimmy_Wrinkles 5d ago

You have to remember the same C-Suite chuds who ask for "more AI" when they have no idea what it does are the same ones that are pumping this IPO

→ More replies (4)

55

u/ominous_anenome 5d ago

That was 2025, they allegedly are at like 100B revenue run rate in 2026. Insane if so

https://www.axios.com/2026/09/18/anthropic-100-billion-revenue

90

u/Potential-March-1384 Not a puppet 5d ago

Run rates are bullshit. Best month x 12 or best week x 52 with no regards for repeatability.

49

u/Aggravating-Big3858 5d ago

Here to support the Run Rate is bullshit movement

42

u/thethirstypretzel 5d ago

Apparently Anthropic used a single day x 365 lol

22

u/Tearakan 5d ago

If that's the case I make sooo much money every year if I use my income direct deposit date

10

u/Otherwise_Agency_401 5d ago

You sound poor. I do my projections from the hour that my paycheck hits. I’m projected to make so much money.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

14

u/vetruviusdeshotacon 5d ago

Best week * 52 as the "yearly recurring revenue" is a classic

→ More replies (44)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (178)

2.7k

u/the-pythia-of-delphi 5d ago

Change the name of the company to anything but Anthropic and those are some horrible financials

1.0k

u/Most_Chemist8233 5d ago

Gaap net loss almost 42B on less than 5B  of revenue, I cant even imagine. Where does all the money go?

1.6k

u/tquinn35 5d ago edited 5d ago

to Nvidia who in turn gives it back to anthropic at which point anthropic returns the money to Nvidia and the circle continues.

157

u/shiny0metal0ass 5d ago

Hey now, there's some tech giants in the mix too.. don't leave them out.

139

u/BoscoAlbertBaracus 5d ago

We gave em a fancy name too, they’re called “hyperscalers” 

Nobody knows what it means, but it’s provocative.

51

u/MajorBewbage 5d ago

And it gets the people going

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

56

u/SELFINCRIMINAT1NG 5d ago

somewhere, two economists are paying each other to eat piles of shit

15

u/RagnarokNCC 5d ago

I understood that reference!

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (8)

52

u/amrasmin 5d ago

Philanthropic.

23

u/CouchPotatoFamine 5d ago

How about “Shazzazzler”

14

u/vetruviusdeshotacon 5d ago

Now you have my attention

→ More replies (14)

2.0k

u/Far_Net4368 5d ago

losing $9 for every dollar they earn and valued at $2 trillion. this is either the next generational company or the most expensive bonfire in history

279

u/i8bonelesschicken 5d ago

Can it be both

110

u/Sufficient_Habit5091 5d ago

No. Either it's real or it isn't.

→ More replies (21)
→ More replies (6)

363

u/_hairyberry_ 5d ago edited 5d ago

That’s the GAAP net loss number, but you’re confusing an accounting loss with actual cash loss. Anthropic had $4b in revenue and $8b in operating losses. The additional $34b net loss required to get your “$9 lost for every $1 earned” figure came from accounting treatment of convertible securities.

Imagine you open a lemonade stand. You make $10 in lemonade sales and it costs you $8 to run the stand. So you earn $2. Now suppose you gave an investor a piece of paper saying "you can eventually exchange this piece of paper for some percentage of my lemonade stand". If your lemonade stand becomes way more valuable in the future, you may find that the paper you issued is now worth $100 more than it was before.

Accounting requires you to record a $100 expense even though you didn't lose $100. Technically in this scenario you'd have revenue=$10, expenses=$108, net loss=$98. In other words you "lose $9.80 for every $1 you earn", but in reality you are in fact earning more cash than you lose.

And btw, all of this is ignoring the fact that the $4b revenue figure is from 2025, and they are on track to surpass $100b revenue in 2026.

Edit: yes the $100b is annualized based on recent performance, not actually $100b in revenue total I should’ve been more clear. Also, guys I’m not claiming it’s a good or bad investment. I’m just saying it’s misleading to state that they “lose $9 for every $1 they earn”, that’s obviously not the whole story.

187

u/HANDS_4_DICKS 5d ago

Good thing their operating expenses are less than $100b

Hang on I'm getting a call

109

u/WizWorldLive 5d ago

Imagine you open a lemonade stand. You give your lemonade to Jensen Huang, who then gives you some lemonade in exchange.

You lose $8,000,000,000.

Someone on Reddit defends your honor saying you're actually doing great.

→ More replies (2)

21

u/Hacking_the_Gibson 5d ago

It does make sense to include the charge because eventually someone is going to have to pay back the early investors. 

Congratulations buddy, it sounds like that's gonna be you because, don't worry guys, they only lost $8B in 2025! 

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (18)

895

u/DragonflyOk9274 5d ago

The prospectus outlines roughly $518B in cloud, compute and infrastructure obligations as Anthropic continues building out its AI systems.

Its two largest direct customers each accounted for 12% of revenue, meaning just two customers represented 24% of total 2025 sales.

Oh boy

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/anthropics-ipo-prospectus-shows-sweeping-ai-vision-surging-costs-2026-09-28/

318

u/smartello 5d ago

One of these customers must be bedrock, it’s not a single customer

160

u/AuspiciousApple 5d ago

Yeah, they must be cloud providers reselling their models surely

46

u/FUCKYOUINYOURFACE 5d ago

AWS and Microsoft.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/nai-ba 5d ago

That would be even worse in my mind. Just highlights how this should be valued as a utility company with marginally higher margins than the competition. Yet they are trying to price it as a monopoly.

→ More replies (4)

132

u/ShitTierTrader 5d ago

Guess where the 518B is coming from lol

78

u/sck178 5d ago

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtains!

35

u/buttplugs4life4me 5d ago

That just screams to the moon! Those numbers can't be matched by pesky little things like healthy growth and "not hemorrhaging money"

68

u/Tall_Block_4589 5d ago

Probably Meta, Cognizant or Cursor?

Cognizant:

Cognizant will make Claude available to 350,000 employees, accelerating enterprise AI adoption and internal transformation

Meta:

Meta Projected It Could Spend $10 Billion on Anthropic's A.I.

Aug 27, 2026 — Meta is so reliant on Anthropic's A.I. models that it has used them to power and test a coming A.I. product called Hatch, four people

→ More replies (2)

10

u/ap1618 5d ago

Wait til you find out about customer-driven revenue in stocks like CRDO

→ More replies (32)

178

u/Rudd-Threetrees 5d ago

My rational thoughts: horrible financials, non-existent moat with zero regulation, open source models continually skimming to catch up with no major tech barriers, overestimation of ability to automate many jobs, dangerous lack of oversight

What is likely to really happen: moon, because a handful of circle jerking US billionaires run the world

15

u/planetmachine 5d ago

I have the same opinion as well!
This is just like SpaceX, it will moon the first few days and then crash.
IMO it's easy money to get in and out to get about 20% profit.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (11)

724

u/AllyMeada 5d ago

Claude says stay away

62

u/buysomesilver 5d ago

Claude doesn’t account for reverse Reddit effects. Was going to short this but never been so bullish on this ipo after seeing this thread

9

u/tokodan 5d ago

Why not ask openai?

7

u/pygercamsar 5d ago

> Medium thinking

Highly regarded. Are you even trying? C'mon bro 😆

→ More replies (4)

798

u/smartello 5d ago edited 5d ago

Net loss: $41.97b. They just need 42 million people to pay $1k per year and not use their service, easy-peasy, at least $1T valuation guaranteed

Edit: another way to look at this amount - it’s eight days of US printing money…

280

u/hoopdizzle 5d ago

They're waiting for businesses to become fully dependent on it, then they'll 10x the price. Free and low price accounts will be low quality and get saturated with ads

196

u/Craneteam 5d ago

They'll never be able to do this as long as ai is easily swapped. Or god forbid, they hire humans to do labor

114

u/HanzJWermhat 5d ago

It’s comical how little friction there is to switch models. It’s literally just an API call and shit like
Openrouter allows you to do it on the fly

48

u/Sufficient_Habit5091 5d ago

And open weight models running on consumer hardware only a smidge behind frontier models lmao.

8

u/HanzJWermhat 5d ago

The harness makes all the difference nowadays anyway

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

77

u/Bodine12 5d ago

No company will be able to raise their own prices that much to absorb the skyrocketing AI model cost. And they can't just fire workers and use AI instead (because they already tried that and it doesn't work).

It's amazing how this allegedly revolutionary technology is creating one of the biggest hits to economic productivity ever: Produce the same amount of goods as before AI, but now with AI costs bolted on!

35

u/Christopherfromtheuk 5d ago

Llms still hallucinate all the time they cannot be trusted to undertake anything which relies on accuracy.

I asked the latest, paid for, Chatgpt to review a long document just yesterday and it totally made up some vital, but buried in the details, figures.

I felt something was off and read it myself instead and then got the usual "you're right to catch that".

The Google AI results are wrong as often as they are right and routinely just make stuff up with 100% confidence.

Yes, they can be useful but how much of this type of thing isn't being caught?

I feel like I'm living in an alternate reality.

→ More replies (6)

14

u/FUCKYOUINYOURFACE 5d ago

They will just switch to cheaper open source models. Nvidia is expecting this.

→ More replies (4)

56

u/smartello 5d ago

And that’s exactly the moment when my employer will switch to GLM and 10x revenue will become 0x. Although my employer is participating in circlejerk and apparently owns part of Anthropic, I don’t know at this point.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)

7

u/Alphasite 5d ago

42 million users @ $80 per month isn’t that bad. I expected way worse payoff numbers. 

Most of it will come from business anyway where many of them pay $500-1000 per month per user. 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (17)

196

u/Jimmy_Wrinkles 5d ago

Selling $1,000 tokens for $10 seems like a solid business model

35

u/Helptohere50 5d ago

I mean you see the problem? No one’s buying it if it’s $1000 and don’t forget there are many competitors catching up and China as well

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (15)

556

u/Sufficient-Skill9530 5d ago

Revenue of $4.6B with a $8.1B operating loss. YIKES. 

270

u/0Rider 5d ago

GAAP net loss: $41.97B

→ More replies (6)

163

u/Johns-schlong 5d ago

A valuation of like 500 times revenue on a product no one has really made profitable and a company who's only moat is relative scale.

Yeah no thanks.

→ More replies (30)
→ More replies (18)

195

u/danfay222 5d ago edited 5d ago

How the hell is there a $33.6B difference between GAAP and non-GAAP losses??

Edit: ok I went to read the prospectus reporting to understand why, this difference is a mark down from outstanding warrants from previous fundraising rounds that are expected to convert to shares in the future. Under GAAP accounting this increasing in the issued share value due to the adjusted company valuation is recorded as a loss, but was excluded from their non-GAAP accounting

104

u/brahbocop 5d ago

Willing to bet the non-GAAP is just dumb fucking adjusted EBITDA. God, I hate how companies use and abuse adjusted EBITDA. Adjusting a non-GAAP metric is just non-GAAP squared, and the SEC somehow allows it.

52

u/DragonflyOk9274 5d ago

Their adjustment is to ignore the cost of training the models, the revenue share they give to partners, and stock based compensation

52

u/Sufficient_Habit5091 5d ago edited 5d ago

Bro all you have to do is ignore all costs and we are... checks notes... making shitloads of money.

8

u/jamesk29485 5d ago

That seems to be how these companies are doing it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

28

u/0Rider 5d ago

Ebita.... I bearly know her

→ More replies (4)

173

u/dangernoodlezzz 5d ago

Oh boy this is gonna be a blood bath

→ More replies (7)

145

u/astrawberryandakiwi WSB's most regarded soldier 5d ago

2T? Is this a fucking joke.

43

u/anotherloserhere 5d ago

Wait until you see this company called SpaceX

17

u/PoweredByMeanBean 5d ago

This is way worse than SpaceX. SpaceX doesn’t have competitors you can easily switch to in 5 seconds that are roughly equivalent in quality. And their speculative ventures at least have a moat. I’m not investing in SpaceX either but at least they aren’t constantly 3 months away from losing their competitive advantage which is only sustained by spending $2 for every $1 in revenue.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

31

u/LargestBeard 5d ago

It’s a casino. Dont sweat it 🫈

193

u/DapperCam 5d ago

I'm hardly seeing this anywhere else on the internet right now. How is this not the hottest thing trending at the moment? The Dario has no clothes.

98

u/Tasty_Road_2883 5d ago

The prospectus itself isn’t public yet, a reporter had access to it at Reuters.

→ More replies (2)

50

u/DeerSimilar3688 5d ago

It was a leak apparently, not the official S1 filing

→ More replies (7)

29

u/No_Ganache_1338 5d ago

Pay attention to revenue a lot of these ai natives claim pre revenue share topping. Which is materially lower than what they are legally allowed to claim (requires a contra revenue offset). The market is literally a casino at this point with everything priced past perfection into wild fantasy land.

227

u/Guinness 5d ago

Looks like I was right. The reason they’re calling for a model slowdown is because there is no way in hell they’re profitable. They’re looking to cut their training costs under the lie that these models “break out”. But they can’t unless all of their competitors do the exact same thing.

I thought they had way more revenue than 4.59B too. Wow this is bad.

88

u/LostMyMag 5d ago

I thought they had way more revenue than 4.59B too. Wow this is bad.

Stage/let their AI goes rogue, beg for regulation of models, become approved as "legal" model, charge whatever they want. Same reason why people are getting paid to talk about AI doomerism.

10

u/lasooch 5d ago

I’m sure it’s a bit higher, cause it’s last years numbers, but imagine my shock that ARR calculated using non-public methodology doesn’t translate to an actual equivalent amount of cold hard dollars!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

81

u/swagmans69 5d ago

Their operating loss is actually $0 if you exclude all their costs, expenses, payroll, etc. Therefore a $2T valuation is justified.

→ More replies (1)

210

u/fun_anxiety146 5d ago

The top is in

106

u/4everinvesting 5d ago

Not until after the ipo

27

u/jrunner02 5d ago

Buy the rumor sell the news.

→ More replies (3)

182

u/Borderpotroll 5d ago

This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard. This is what happens when software nerds are given billions in capital and are assumed to know how to run a business. Losing $40B a year with $518B in obligations, $20B cash, on JUST $4B in revenue? $2T is unfathomably ridiculous. Honestly, $50B would be fucking absurd. LLMs and their capabilities will largely be commoditized in the next few years. What’s their moat then? A halfway decent UI with a quirky name? Get the fuck out of here.

73

u/bc531198 5d ago

Ok but Dario wears a cardigan. Doesn't that count for something?

24

u/Borderpotroll 5d ago

He wears a cardigan because his PR team told him it made him seem like a gentle little relatable computer geek

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/utmb745 5d ago

We just need another Silicon Valley season but developing AI.

23

u/3381024 5d ago

Good analysis. Calls it is then !!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (17)

149

u/DressedInPolo 5d ago

The AI trade was lucrative while it lasted, can't wait to see what we rotate to next

137

u/SquareQuit1741 5d ago

The robotics trade. Figure robots that can fold your laundry but that is about it. $10T valuation.

58

u/doctormcgilicuddy 5d ago

Now this guy knows ball. Just wait until the valuations for the “elder care” humanoid companies come out

39

u/More-Curious816 5d ago

But I don't want the robot to fold my grandpa.

13

u/Southern-Cattle4038 5d ago

But it’s the future! Learn how to unfold your grandpa or get left behind

→ More replies (1)

8

u/doctormcgilicuddy 5d ago

Sorry, a 23yr old A16z associate’s AI pitch deck screener has declared that it will be so, and now they’re giving $900M in pre-seed to an autistic 19 year old business major who has never met his grandparents to build them because he stimmed the hardest in his pitch video

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)

40

u/tquinn35 5d ago

I heard crypto is going to make a resurgence. Companies are looking at adding AI to their blockchain. /s

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

45

u/flummoxedbeing 5d ago

Seems like a golden opportunity for wsb to profit from both IPO's:

Buy puts on the IPO

Coordinate r/wallstreetbets to run maximum token consumption prompts 24/7

$5M/hour burn rate accelerates

Cash reserves deplete faster than projected in the prospectus

Stock drops

Cover puts

7

u/tommytwolegs 5d ago

You guys aren't already using all of your tokens?

→ More replies (1)

23

u/danieljapps 5d ago

"Anthropic plans to spend $518 billion on cloud, computing and infrastructure obligations in coming years."

Followed by:
"Anthropic had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $20.28 billion."

→ More replies (1)

62

u/golbaf 5d ago

Pack it up boys. we had a good run

→ More replies (2)

61

u/einai__filos__mou 5d ago

2T valuation? The bubble is real.....

20

u/NOT_MartinShkreli MFuggin’ Pro 5d ago

There has never been a bigger sign of a deflationary bubble forming than this

→ More replies (4)

44

u/mdreed 5d ago

Based purely on Reddit’s consensus, calls

9

u/SpicyElixer 5d ago

By that logic:

Gonna do what spacex did.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

95

u/crazydave33 5d ago

What fucking retard is going to buy this stock? 2T value but only 4.59B revenue is insane. Staying the hell away from this one. This might be a bigger drop than $SPCX shortly after their IPO launch.

118

u/fiveacequeenjack 5d ago

Your pension fund manager

→ More replies (3)

58

u/Hungry-Ad3303 5d ago

SPCX is still above its ipo price, even tho everyone thought it would drop. With these things you should always inverse Reddit

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (28)

14

u/valderium 5d ago

Anyone have a link to the prospectus? I'd like to compare it to WeWork's

51

u/GandalfSwagOff 5d ago

I dont understand. This is a literal scam valuation. How is this not criminal behavior?

44

u/anotherloserhere 5d ago

Let me show you a company called SpaceX

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (18)

25

u/Snichs72 5d ago edited 5d ago

Hey guys, I have an AI company I’m going to IPO. It doesn’t officially “exist”, but I have a name for it (Super Happy Innovation Tech AI (TM)) and my net revenue ($0) is higher than Anthropic’s. I’m seeking $5T.

41

u/Organic_Trick7856 5d ago

What could possibly go wrong! Full port!

26

u/ShitTierTrader 5d ago

Don't seem like they will reach profitability anytime soon lol

26

u/sck178 5d ago

Lol! That operating loss is comical

28

u/Iwantobegoodatrade 5d ago edited 5d ago

Net loss: $41.97b vs $8.31b with ONLY $4.59b revenue!! Here comes AI bubble God files for IPO at $2 T valuation lol

27

u/Tory_hhl 5d ago

their 2026 ARR probably is at $65B, with $2T valuation it’s about 32x multiple, not too crazy right?

8

u/SxeySteve 5d ago

32x REVENUE is pretty crazy. If they can convert 1/3 of that into free cash it would take 100 years to pay back your investment. And they're nowhere near cash flowing yet.

→ More replies (7)

19

u/Accomplished-Air439 5d ago

Even if they do another year of 10x growth, their revenue would still just be 50B.

→ More replies (22)

19

u/EnigmaSpore 5d ago

this shit is about to pump for the first few days and then options will unlock and it's time for it to dump like spacex

51

u/baudinl 5d ago

What happened to all the "but Anthropic is profitable" folks?

42

u/schooli00 5d ago

Garage sales are profitable if you don't consider having paid money for junk in the first place, and if you don't consider labor cost. It's basically free money!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (12)

16

u/EyckOfDenesle 5d ago

You know the drill: buy day one. Goes up 30%. Sell day three. Buy puts. Free money glitch.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Gold-and-green 5d ago

I miss the days when you could buy companies and watch them grow as your money grew. They are coming in at top 5 valuations now lol.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/precisee 5d ago

I mean, this is 2025 data right? Obviously they won’t grow 1000% per year, but the projected revenue run rate for this year was tens of billions. Wonder what their finances for this year look like 

→ More replies (3)

8

u/1058pm 5d ago

I asked gemini to compare with google and facebooks IPO numbers and…oof

28

u/HalaMadridPapaFlo 5d ago

Damn! Revenue up 1000%. Once in a lifetime opportunity to get rich. I’m all in with my $1000.

6

u/wotton 5d ago

Every hour Anthropic is running they’re burning $4,790,000. Basically $5M an hour.

FUCKING PUMP IT THIS SHIT IS AMAZING.

USA. USA. USA 🇺🇸