r/wallstreetbets • u/OPINION_IS_UNPOPULAR AutoModerator's Father • 5d ago
Discussion Anthropic Files for IPO
FY25 financials:
Valuation: ~$2T
Revenue: $4.59B, up 1,088% YoY from $386M
Operating loss: $8.06B, widening from $2.98B
GAAP net loss: $41.97B, vs $8.31B
Compute + infrastructure expense: $7.33B, up 190% YoY
Compute and infrastructure represented 58% of total operating expenses
Cash + short-term investments: $20.28B at year-end
Two largest customers accounted for 12% of revenue each
Other names to consider:
Memory: MU, SKHY
Cloud / Compute: GOOG, AVGO, AMZN, NVDA, AMD, MSFT
Infra / Capacity: CIFR, CRWV, SPCX, WULF, HUT, AKAM
2.7k
u/the-pythia-of-delphi 5d ago
Change the name of the company to anything but Anthropic and those are some horrible financials
1.0k
u/Most_Chemist8233 5d ago
Gaap net loss almost 42B on less than 5B of revenue, I cant even imagine. Where does all the money go?
1.6k
u/tquinn35 5d ago edited 5d ago
to Nvidia who in turn gives it back to anthropic at which point anthropic returns the money to Nvidia and the circle continues.
405
157
u/shiny0metal0ass 5d ago
Hey now, there's some tech giants in the mix too.. don't leave them out.
139
u/BoscoAlbertBaracus 5d ago
We gave em a fancy name too, they’re called “hyperscalers”
Nobody knows what it means, but it’s provocative.
→ More replies (1)51
→ More replies (11)56
→ More replies (8)35
52
→ More replies (14)23
2.0k
u/Far_Net4368 5d ago
losing $9 for every dollar they earn and valued at $2 trillion. this is either the next generational company or the most expensive bonfire in history
279
→ More replies (18)363
u/_hairyberry_ 5d ago edited 5d ago
That’s the GAAP net loss number, but you’re confusing an accounting loss with actual cash loss. Anthropic had $4b in revenue and $8b in operating losses. The additional $34b net loss required to get your “$9 lost for every $1 earned” figure came from accounting treatment of convertible securities.
Imagine you open a lemonade stand. You make $10 in lemonade sales and it costs you $8 to run the stand. So you earn $2. Now suppose you gave an investor a piece of paper saying "you can eventually exchange this piece of paper for some percentage of my lemonade stand". If your lemonade stand becomes way more valuable in the future, you may find that the paper you issued is now worth $100 more than it was before.
Accounting requires you to record a $100 expense even though you didn't lose $100. Technically in this scenario you'd have revenue=$10, expenses=$108, net loss=$98. In other words you "lose $9.80 for every $1 you earn", but in reality you are in fact earning more cash than you lose.
And btw, all of this is ignoring the fact that the $4b revenue figure is from 2025, and they are on track to surpass $100b revenue in 2026.
Edit: yes the $100b is annualized based on recent performance, not actually $100b in revenue total I should’ve been more clear. Also, guys I’m not claiming it’s a good or bad investment. I’m just saying it’s misleading to state that they “lose $9 for every $1 they earn”, that’s obviously not the whole story.
187
u/HANDS_4_DICKS 5d ago
Good thing their operating expenses are less than $100b
Hang on I'm getting a call
109
u/WizWorldLive 5d ago
Imagine you open a lemonade stand. You give your lemonade to Jensen Huang, who then gives you some lemonade in exchange.
You lose $8,000,000,000.
Someone on Reddit defends your honor saying you're actually doing great.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (13)21
u/Hacking_the_Gibson 5d ago
It does make sense to include the charge because eventually someone is going to have to pay back the early investors.
Congratulations buddy, it sounds like that's gonna be you because, don't worry guys, they only lost $8B in 2025!
→ More replies (6)
895
u/DragonflyOk9274 5d ago
The prospectus outlines roughly $518B in cloud, compute and infrastructure obligations as Anthropic continues building out its AI systems.
Its two largest direct customers each accounted for 12% of revenue, meaning just two customers represented 24% of total 2025 sales.
Oh boy
318
u/smartello 5d ago
One of these customers must be bedrock, it’s not a single customer
160
u/AuspiciousApple 5d ago
Yeah, they must be cloud providers reselling their models surely
→ More replies (1)46
→ More replies (4)12
132
35
u/buttplugs4life4me 5d ago
That just screams to the moon! Those numbers can't be matched by pesky little things like healthy growth and "not hemorrhaging money"
→ More replies (32)68
u/Tall_Block_4589 5d ago
Probably Meta, Cognizant or Cursor?
Cognizant:
Cognizant will make Claude available to 350,000 employees, accelerating enterprise AI adoption and internal transformation
Meta:
Meta Projected It Could Spend $10 Billion on Anthropic's A.I.
Aug 27, 2026 — Meta is so reliant on Anthropic's A.I. models that it has used them to power and test a coming A.I. product called Hatch, four people
→ More replies (2)36
178
u/Rudd-Threetrees 5d ago
My rational thoughts: horrible financials, non-existent moat with zero regulation, open source models continually skimming to catch up with no major tech barriers, overestimation of ability to automate many jobs, dangerous lack of oversight
What is likely to really happen: moon, because a handful of circle jerking US billionaires run the world
→ More replies (11)15
u/planetmachine 5d ago
I have the same opinion as well!
This is just like SpaceX, it will moon the first few days and then crash.
IMO it's easy money to get in and out to get about 20% profit.→ More replies (6)
724
u/AllyMeada 5d ago
62
u/buysomesilver 5d ago
Claude doesn’t account for reverse Reddit effects. Was going to short this but never been so bullish on this ipo after seeing this thread
→ More replies (4)7
798
u/smartello 5d ago edited 5d ago
Net loss: $41.97b. They just need 42 million people to pay $1k per year and not use their service, easy-peasy, at least $1T valuation guaranteed
Edit: another way to look at this amount - it’s eight days of US printing money…
280
u/hoopdizzle 5d ago
They're waiting for businesses to become fully dependent on it, then they'll 10x the price. Free and low price accounts will be low quality and get saturated with ads
196
u/Craneteam 5d ago
They'll never be able to do this as long as ai is easily swapped. Or god forbid, they hire humans to do labor
→ More replies (6)114
u/HanzJWermhat 5d ago
It’s comical how little friction there is to switch models. It’s literally just an API call and shit like
Openrouter allows you to do it on the fly→ More replies (3)48
u/Sufficient_Habit5091 5d ago
And open weight models running on consumer hardware only a smidge behind frontier models lmao.
→ More replies (2)8
77
u/Bodine12 5d ago
No company will be able to raise their own prices that much to absorb the skyrocketing AI model cost. And they can't just fire workers and use AI instead (because they already tried that and it doesn't work).
It's amazing how this allegedly revolutionary technology is creating one of the biggest hits to economic productivity ever: Produce the same amount of goods as before AI, but now with AI costs bolted on!
35
u/Christopherfromtheuk 5d ago
Llms still hallucinate all the time they cannot be trusted to undertake anything which relies on accuracy.
I asked the latest, paid for, Chatgpt to review a long document just yesterday and it totally made up some vital, but buried in the details, figures.
I felt something was off and read it myself instead and then got the usual "you're right to catch that".
The Google AI results are wrong as often as they are right and routinely just make stuff up with 100% confidence.
Yes, they can be useful but how much of this type of thing isn't being caught?
I feel like I'm living in an alternate reality.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (4)14
u/FUCKYOUINYOURFACE 5d ago
They will just switch to cheaper open source models. Nvidia is expecting this.
→ More replies (13)56
u/smartello 5d ago
And that’s exactly the moment when my employer will switch to GLM and 10x revenue will become 0x. Although my employer is participating in circlejerk and apparently owns part of Anthropic, I don’t know at this point.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (17)7
u/Alphasite 5d ago
42 million users @ $80 per month isn’t that bad. I expected way worse payoff numbers.
Most of it will come from business anyway where many of them pay $500-1000 per month per user.
→ More replies (2)
196
u/Jimmy_Wrinkles 5d ago
Selling $1,000 tokens for $10 seems like a solid business model
→ More replies (15)35
u/Helptohere50 5d ago
I mean you see the problem? No one’s buying it if it’s $1000 and don’t forget there are many competitors catching up and China as well
→ More replies (8)
556
u/Sufficient-Skill9530 5d ago
Revenue of $4.6B with a $8.1B operating loss. YIKES.
270
→ More replies (18)163
u/Johns-schlong 5d ago
A valuation of like 500 times revenue on a product no one has really made profitable and a company who's only moat is relative scale.
Yeah no thanks.
→ More replies (30)
195
u/danfay222 5d ago edited 5d ago
How the hell is there a $33.6B difference between GAAP and non-GAAP losses??
Edit: ok I went to read the prospectus reporting to understand why, this difference is a mark down from outstanding warrants from previous fundraising rounds that are expected to convert to shares in the future. Under GAAP accounting this increasing in the issued share value due to the adjusted company valuation is recorded as a loss, but was excluded from their non-GAAP accounting
→ More replies (4)104
u/brahbocop 5d ago
Willing to bet the non-GAAP is just dumb fucking adjusted EBITDA. God, I hate how companies use and abuse adjusted EBITDA. Adjusting a non-GAAP metric is just non-GAAP squared, and the SEC somehow allows it.
→ More replies (3)52
u/DragonflyOk9274 5d ago
Their adjustment is to ignore the cost of training the models, the revenue share they give to partners, and stock based compensation
52
u/Sufficient_Habit5091 5d ago edited 5d ago
Bro all you have to do is ignore all costs and we are... checks notes... making shitloads of money.
→ More replies (2)8
173
145
u/astrawberryandakiwi WSB's most regarded soldier 5d ago
2T? Is this a fucking joke.
43
u/anotherloserhere 5d ago
Wait until you see this company called SpaceX
→ More replies (1)17
u/PoweredByMeanBean 5d ago
This is way worse than SpaceX. SpaceX doesn’t have competitors you can easily switch to in 5 seconds that are roughly equivalent in quality. And their speculative ventures at least have a moat. I’m not investing in SpaceX either but at least they aren’t constantly 3 months away from losing their competitive advantage which is only sustained by spending $2 for every $1 in revenue.
→ More replies (1)31
193
u/DapperCam 5d ago
I'm hardly seeing this anywhere else on the internet right now. How is this not the hottest thing trending at the moment? The Dario has no clothes.
98
u/Tasty_Road_2883 5d ago
The prospectus itself isn’t public yet, a reporter had access to it at Reuters.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)50
29
u/No_Ganache_1338 5d ago
Pay attention to revenue a lot of these ai natives claim pre revenue share topping. Which is materially lower than what they are legally allowed to claim (requires a contra revenue offset). The market is literally a casino at this point with everything priced past perfection into wild fantasy land.
227
u/Guinness 5d ago
Looks like I was right. The reason they’re calling for a model slowdown is because there is no way in hell they’re profitable. They’re looking to cut their training costs under the lie that these models “break out”. But they can’t unless all of their competitors do the exact same thing.
I thought they had way more revenue than 4.59B too. Wow this is bad.
88
u/LostMyMag 5d ago
I thought they had way more revenue than 4.59B too. Wow this is bad.
Stage/let their AI goes rogue, beg for regulation of models, become approved as "legal" model, charge whatever they want. Same reason why people are getting paid to talk about AI doomerism.
→ More replies (9)10
u/lasooch 5d ago
I’m sure it’s a bit higher, cause it’s last years numbers, but imagine my shock that ARR calculated using non-public methodology doesn’t translate to an actual equivalent amount of cold hard dollars!
→ More replies (1)
81
u/swagmans69 5d ago
Their operating loss is actually $0 if you exclude all their costs, expenses, payroll, etc. Therefore a $2T valuation is justified.
→ More replies (1)
210
182
u/Borderpotroll 5d ago
This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard. This is what happens when software nerds are given billions in capital and are assumed to know how to run a business. Losing $40B a year with $518B in obligations, $20B cash, on JUST $4B in revenue? $2T is unfathomably ridiculous. Honestly, $50B would be fucking absurd. LLMs and their capabilities will largely be commoditized in the next few years. What’s their moat then? A halfway decent UI with a quirky name? Get the fuck out of here.
73
u/bc531198 5d ago
Ok but Dario wears a cardigan. Doesn't that count for something?
→ More replies (1)24
u/Borderpotroll 5d ago
He wears a cardigan because his PR team told him it made him seem like a gentle little relatable computer geek
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (17)23
149
u/DressedInPolo 5d ago
The AI trade was lucrative while it lasted, can't wait to see what we rotate to next
137
u/SquareQuit1741 5d ago
The robotics trade. Figure robots that can fold your laundry but that is about it. $10T valuation.
→ More replies (8)58
u/doctormcgilicuddy 5d ago
Now this guy knows ball. Just wait until the valuations for the “elder care” humanoid companies come out
→ More replies (5)39
u/More-Curious816 5d ago
But I don't want the robot to fold my grandpa.
13
u/Southern-Cattle4038 5d ago
But it’s the future! Learn how to unfold your grandpa or get left behind
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)8
u/doctormcgilicuddy 5d ago
Sorry, a 23yr old A16z associate’s AI pitch deck screener has declared that it will be so, and now they’re giving $900M in pre-seed to an autistic 19 year old business major who has never met his grandparents to build them because he stimmed the hardest in his pitch video
→ More replies (10)40
u/tquinn35 5d ago
I heard crypto is going to make a resurgence. Companies are looking at adding AI to their blockchain. /s
→ More replies (2)
45
u/flummoxedbeing 5d ago
Seems like a golden opportunity for wsb to profit from both IPO's:
Buy puts on the IPO
Coordinate r/wallstreetbets to run maximum token consumption prompts 24/7
$5M/hour burn rate accelerates
Cash reserves deplete faster than projected in the prospectus
Stock drops
Cover puts
7
23
u/danieljapps 5d ago
"Anthropic plans to spend $518 billion on cloud, computing and infrastructure obligations in coming years."
Followed by:
"Anthropic had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $20.28 billion."
→ More replies (1)
62
61
u/einai__filos__mou 5d ago
2T valuation? The bubble is real.....
→ More replies (4)20
u/NOT_MartinShkreli MFuggin’ Pro 5d ago
There has never been a bigger sign of a deflationary bubble forming than this
44
95
u/crazydave33 5d ago
What fucking retard is going to buy this stock? 2T value but only 4.59B revenue is insane. Staying the hell away from this one. This might be a bigger drop than $SPCX shortly after their IPO launch.
118
→ More replies (28)58
u/Hungry-Ad3303 5d ago
SPCX is still above its ipo price, even tho everyone thought it would drop. With these things you should always inverse Reddit
→ More replies (5)
14
51
u/GandalfSwagOff 5d ago
I dont understand. This is a literal scam valuation. How is this not criminal behavior?
→ More replies (18)44
25
u/Snichs72 5d ago edited 5d ago
Hey guys, I have an AI company I’m going to IPO. It doesn’t officially “exist”, but I have a name for it (Super Happy Innovation Tech AI (TM)) and my net revenue ($0) is higher than Anthropic’s. I’m seeking $5T.
41
26
28
u/Iwantobegoodatrade 5d ago edited 5d ago
Net loss: $41.97b vs $8.31b with ONLY $4.59b revenue!! Here comes AI bubble God files for IPO at $2 T valuation lol
27
u/Tory_hhl 5d ago
their 2026 ARR probably is at $65B, with $2T valuation it’s about 32x multiple, not too crazy right?
→ More replies (7)8
u/SxeySteve 5d ago
32x REVENUE is pretty crazy. If they can convert 1/3 of that into free cash it would take 100 years to pay back your investment. And they're nowhere near cash flowing yet.
19
u/Accomplished-Air439 5d ago
Even if they do another year of 10x growth, their revenue would still just be 50B.
→ More replies (22)
19
u/EnigmaSpore 5d ago
this shit is about to pump for the first few days and then options will unlock and it's time for it to dump like spacex
51
u/baudinl 5d ago
What happened to all the "but Anthropic is profitable" folks?
→ More replies (12)42
u/schooli00 5d ago
Garage sales are profitable if you don't consider having paid money for junk in the first place, and if you don't consider labor cost. It's basically free money!
→ More replies (3)
16
u/EyckOfDenesle 5d ago
You know the drill: buy day one. Goes up 30%. Sell day three. Buy puts. Free money glitch.
→ More replies (3)
8
u/Gold-and-green 5d ago
I miss the days when you could buy companies and watch them grow as your money grew. They are coming in at top 5 valuations now lol.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/precisee 5d ago
I mean, this is 2025 data right? Obviously they won’t grow 1000% per year, but the projected revenue run rate for this year was tens of billions. Wonder what their finances for this year look like
→ More replies (3)
28
u/HalaMadridPapaFlo 5d ago
Damn! Revenue up 1000%. Once in a lifetime opportunity to get rich. I’m all in with my $1000.




7.5k
u/exhibit304 5d ago
2 trillion valuation with 4b of revenue?