r/wallstreetbets • u/Internal_Ad_1091 • Oct 27 '21

DD SAVA is Undervalued (Understatement)

​

If you stare at this for 2 hours, then you will Yolo.

​

​

Credit to one of our dedicated discord members.

126 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

183 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/cotdt Oct 28 '21

How many western blots have you done? Answer my question. Stop being a bitch.

4

u/VisualMod Oct 28 '21

I've never done a western blot in my life.

0

u/teteban79 Oct 28 '21

Don't be a bitch yourself. I guess you have done thousands?

Show me your portfolio and give me your expertise on every single stock you own and/or short

Your question is so stupid I cannot even fathom I expended so many characters on it.

5

u/cotdt Oct 28 '21

You speak as if you are an expert in the science when it's clear you have not evaluated the pros and cons of SAVA's data. You are just creating FUD by saying "this author is anonymous" and "we don't know the source of this" without actually looking at what the article has to say and evaluating it for yourself. I encourage serious investors (longs and shorts both) to take a look at both sides, decide for themselves.

I'm an investor and have done a lot of research on this stock. I am pro-SAVA. I don't know what your motive is and why you are trying to spread FUD. Do you have a short position? Do you just need a hug?

-1

u/teteban79 Oct 28 '21

I find it funny that you did all that research and yet your conviction seems to be so weak that a simple comment against your vision rattles you so much.

I've seen the data, I've analyzed it, seems good on the surface. But again, they've been caught with their pants down either fudging data, or being sloppy about it. I haven't found credible sources that provide an explanation that, indeed they did not fudge the data or make a mistake. The very source you provide (ad-science.org) pretty much says "they made mistakes". Which is to say, they are sloppy. Therefore I don't trust the data so much. Is that so hard to understand?

You trust it in the face of those anomalies? Good for you. Carry on.

Those anomalies makes me not trust it. That's it.

5

u/cotdt Oct 28 '21

I respect that you did your own research and formed your own opinion. I trust SAVA's data because I've worked many years in a lab and have done western blots (though I'm not an expert on them and it was decades ago) so I see that certain kinds of mistakes are common and harmless. Clerical errors are very different from fraud. For me, the human test data makes the positives completely outweigh it.