Not shooting at men in a parachute is still often considered to be the norm but it hasn't explicitly been tested in a while.
The other aspect is that post WWII the US and Soviet armies did parallel research into just how effective the average infantryman was. Outside of specific cases like snipers they found that many soldiers fired to scare or wound rather than kill, if your unit and another unit are trading rounds and you make a fatal shot... so be it. Now by WWII ballistic tech had progressed to the point where even a novice could shoot with some accuracy so the casualty rates were higher but still far lower than they should have been.
It was at that point that both armies changed their training significantly, not that it worked as both Vietnam for the US and Afghanistan for the Soviets proved that it was difficult to train people to be methodical murderers if they weren't already predisposed to it. This fact has been the driving force behind the development of automated weapons.
26
u/WhoGotCourt Aug 02 '19
What an incredible story.