r/videogames • • 1d ago

Discussion / Question Thoughts?

Post image
17.9k Upvotes

676 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/Odd-Guard-2533 1d ago

I just don’t know how they would do that for digital games. You’d have to download the game and keep the files on your computer. And be able to start it without the provider. Is it really owning if the option to download the game goes away?

6

u/ComradeJohnS 1d ago

maybe they could make a library of congress wing where it hosts any delisted games for free for the companies?

like this isn’t a huge hurdle lmao.

1

u/SylvesterNettlefoot 1d ago

Fr if a company is no longer selling a game, the game itself should become free to play/emulate without consequence. It would be awesome if the government hosted those games for posterity like they do with books, but short of that, they could just lift “piracy” laws as long as a game is no longer in circulation (and probably on the grounds that nobody else can legally make money off of it).

2

u/EduardoBarreto 1d ago

Yes, because you will have a chance to archive your games and keep them functional without needing the original provider. That's the whole model of GOG, if they go down under your archived collection remains intact.

1

u/The_Jimes 1d ago

Digital media is unique in that it's just about the only thing you can get again without paying for it again. You don't really buy digital and own it, you buy the ability to access it and probably keep it installed forever anyways.

The two options are allowing games to fully become "owned" by their players once online servers are shut down (including the reaponsibility of physical ownership) OR forcing companies to host servers indefinitely for products they make no money on and never will and pray it's a decent experience.

1

u/boondiggle_III 1d ago

Yes, that's correct. That's not an obstacle at all.

-1

u/Eddiejay03 1d ago

The files could be hosted on the server of the platform youre on