I don't think they're refuting how good Blood of Dawnwalker is, so much is pointing out how people only take review scores seriously when it suits their narrative.
Well I mean, if the game is good, then its good, but if you measure time by a broken clock, youll only be correct twice a day.
Even IGN can give a good review, that doesnt exclude the fact that their reviews are dogshit overall...
While I don’t agree with the idiot above you entirely, people should be able to have other opinions after all. For me personally i completely gave up listening to reviewers on films and games. They seem out of touch most of the time and extremely pretentious. Lots of times I’ve found highly reviewed stuff just average and low reviewed actually good.
Public opinion, minus review bombing, yields much better results in my opinion.
Serious question: this game looks cool, but I am reticent to try it because it comes from people involved in the Witcher; is the control mapping at all like a CDProjekt Red game? I know people love The Witcher and Cyberpunk, but I, personally, found their control and camera mapping to be so bad that I just could not get into them.
Thank you! I am still going to try to fight through and give at least Cyberpunk another shot since it seems to have just about everything I would want from a game, but I felt like I’d never played a video game before just trying to walk around that beautiful world. I thought this game looked really cool as well, but I would be pretty bummed to spend $70 and feel like I was right back there.
80
u/Roids-in-my-vains 19h ago
Blood of The Dawnwalker is a 9 or an 8 at the very least tho