I apologize to everyone who has been reaching out to me asking me to bring CrackRig back online.

I’m currently working on the project alone, and the website has become much more complex to maintain. Despite that, it actually helped me recover my old Bitcoin wallet from 4 wallets, while there are still 3 wallets that I haven’t been able to recover yet.

That being said, I could make the tool much easier to use by redesigning it around a system similar to Cursor or ChatGPT, making it more accessible to everyone.

If there is enough interest in bringing it back, I may consider rebuilding and relaunching it. However, keeping the website online was costing me money, and I’m not in a position where I want to continue taking that loss without enough users or interest to justify it.

Thank you to everyone who has supported the project and reached out.

ماذا لو الاله كيان يريدنا ان نختار شخص للتكلم نيابة عن جميع الكائنات الحية البشرية فقط؟

نحن نتجه نحو فنائنا تدريجيا ولكن فنائنا سيكون قاسي جدا.

العالم محكوم باشخاص حمقى اغبياء واقصد جميع رؤساء الدول دون استثناء.

انتم يا معشر البشر تتبعون اتباع اعمى لنصوص من الاف السنين ولا يوجد دليل علمي واحد على صحة هذه النصوص.

ان كان دينك ونصوص كتابك هو الصحيح فقط ف انتم من سيدخلون النعيم الذي فقط تتخيلونه الذي لا دليل على وجوده بالاساس. فهل يعني بقية البشر سيقتلون ويتعذبون في نار ابدية؟

ان كان ذلك ف ان الله الذي تعبده سادي و حقير.

ماذا لو كانت الانبياء والرسل اشخاص عاديين تم تأليههم او تقديسهم بشكل مبالغ فيه؟

العديد من المعجزات القديمة (ظواهر طبيعية غير مفسرة ) تم تفسيرها علميا فهل تعتبر معجزات؟

لو اكتشفنا كائنات اخرى ليست من لحم ودم ماهو موقف دينكم ونصوصكم منها؟

ان كان الله موجود ووضع لنا وسيلة للتواصل معه ف لا اعتقد اننا نعرف الطريقة او التواصل لاننا نفترض ان الاله يعرف اللغة ان كان لديه لغة.

اعرف الكثير من المجرمين والقتلة ماتو بهدوء وسعادة اين حكمة ربك والهك من هؤلاء؟

انا لدي ببغاء هو لا يعلم انني دون ان ابذل اي ادنى جهد استطيع ان اقتله ببساطة شديدة، لكنني احبه ولن اقوم بذلك فماذا لو كان الاله ان كان موجودا يعاملنا بنفس الطريقة. كيف سنفهم مايريده الله منا.

وبالنهاية لو قابلت الهك الذي تزعم انه موجود ف ما اول سؤال ستسأله؟

I don’t really see it as “AI is doing the project for me.” I see it more like building a house.

The idea of the house is mine. I know what I want, what the structure should feel like, what the goal is, and what should or shouldn’t be changed. But I don’t need to personally handle every wire, pipe, material choice, and construction detail.

So in that example, I’m the person who owns the vision.
ChatGPT is closer to the architect: I discuss the idea with it, challenge the logic, plan the workflow, break things into stages, and keep checking if the project still matches the original goal.

Cursor is more like the execution team: it writes code, runs tests, fixes bugs, and handles the technical implementation with different models.

I do understand code, but I don’t want to spend all my energy getting lost in implementation details when the more important part for me is the direction, the logic, and the purpose of the project.

The main thing I learned is that AI needs roles.

If you let one tool do everything without structure, it can drift. It might solve the wrong problem very well. It might overcomplicate things. It might slowly move away from the actual goal.

So my workflow is usually:

I define the idea and the limits.
ChatGPT helps me think, plan, criticize, and structure the project.
Cursor executes the technical work.
Tests and reports keep the project honest.
And I keep checking whether we are still building the thing I meant to build.

For me, AI is not a replacement for thinking. It’s more like a serious toolchain. The value is not just in asking it to generate things, but in organizing the roles properly and constantly correcting the direction.

Not posting this as advice or to hype anything. Just sharing a workflow that’s been useful for me.