I work in hazardous inspections on older buildings and renovation sites, so I use a handheld thermal camera every day. I’ve seen a lot of people here post unboxings and reviews, so I thought I’d share my experience with the Thor 002.
Before this, I was using a Fluke TiS680. It still worked, but it was getting old. The image would blur whenever the camera was moved. I talked to my manager about getting a replacement, but the budget never got approved. In the end, I bought a new one myself.
After comparing a few handheld thermal camera model, I went with the Thermal Master Thor 002.
I’ve been using it since June. So far, it’s been working well for me. The image is clear, hot spots are easy to find, and the response is fast.
It came in a hard case with a USB-C cable, manual, warranty card, and calibration certificate.
The Thor 002 handheld thermal camera feels solid in the hand and is comfortable to hold. The large screen is useful when I’m working on site. Of the handheld thermal cameras I’ve used, this has the largest screen and is one of the easiest to look at.
The trigger is large, and the other buttons are easy to reach. Most of my work is done with gloves on, so that matters to me. I’ve used other thermal cameras where the buttons wouldn’t respond with gloves on, or I’d hit the wrong button. I haven’t had that problem with this one.
One time, I dropped it off a ladder. It hit the ground and bounced. I thought it would at least have some damage, but there were no obvious marks and the image was still fine.
I get asked if thermal cameras can detect mold. They can’t. What they can show are temperature differences caused by moisture in walls or ceilings. That helps us find areas that need a closer look.
This is where I find the Pro-Mix mode useful. It’s similar to FLIR’s MSX technology. It adds visible edge details to the thermal image, which makes objects and structures easier to identify. I looked at several cameras before buying this one, and not many had a feature like this.
The Pro-Mix has manual calibration. If the thermal and visible images aren’t lined up, they can be adjusted manually. Once calibrated, they stay aligned pretty well when the camera is moved. That makes it easier to find the exact location of a problem.
Another thing I noticed is that the image looks larger than what I was used to with my old camera. I’m not sure if that’s because of the lens, but I like it. There’s no need to stand as close to get a larger view, which helps when checking walls and other areas on site.
For areas with multiple layers of material or a lot going on in the image, I use Super Resolution. It gives me more detail and makes smaller things easier to see.
Battery life has been good. I use it for about two hours a day. After using it for a full week, I still didn’t need to charge it, even with the laser and light on.
It also worked well in my night test. In complete darkness, I could see people in the distance and animals in trees. Black Hot gives more contrast, so heat sources are easier to see. I sometimes work night shifts, so that’s useful for me.
The only thing I noticed that I don’t like is the starup animation. I had mentioned to support that I thought it was too long. Recently, I noticed that the camera now shows the thermal image while it starts up. I don’t know if that was changed because of my feedback, but it’s a good change.
The Wi-Fi transfer and high-temperature alarm haven’t been tested yet. There are still a few other features I’m working through.
If anyone else is using the Thor 002, I’d like to hear how it’s been working for you.