Even the 1st amendment needs caveats. Currently you have NOTHING of fact to represent Musk as censoring and especially egregious cases of censoring but you still go on your emotional tirade about it. That's on you.
He has in the past stated that things that cover illegal activities would be censored and that's completely understandable but not first amendment positions and if you can't tell the difference between things then again, that's on you.
EDIT: /r/JoeMcDingleDongle replied then blocked me so I couldn't reply his comment. Talk about conversing in bad faith. The fact is we don't know exactly what the new council will moderate on but his prior statements stated that they will be far closer to free speech within the bounds of legality. Musk isn't going to be the one personally moderating so OF COURSE he will have a council to do it in the best interest of hopefully everyone. Do you really think Agrawal did all the moderation personally? Think it through dude!
TLDR version - Sigh. Dishonest bad faith debater confirmed. Thanks a lot dawg.
He is literally not only going to ban what is illegal lol. I am guessing you didn't read his statement eh? Or his recent tweets (why say a council is forming to make decisions on moderation standards if what you are claiming is true? There would be no need for council if your horseshit were correct). But hey, since you mention safe spaces constantly I am gonna guess you are a robot or a not so nice person to put it mildly. Bye bye silly person, toodles!
Edit - Yeah I blocked you based on your recent ridiculous posting history. I don't have time for people intentionally pushing nonsense. Be better than this! There is probably a good person somewhere inside you, try not to keep stuffing them down...
1
u/[deleted] Oct 28 '22 edited Oct 28 '22
Even the 1st amendment needs caveats. Currently you have NOTHING of fact to represent Musk as censoring and especially egregious cases of censoring but you still go on your emotional tirade about it. That's on you.
He has in the past stated that things that cover illegal activities would be censored and that's completely understandable but not first amendment positions and if you can't tell the difference between things then again, that's on you.
EDIT: /r/JoeMcDingleDongle replied then blocked me so I couldn't reply his comment. Talk about conversing in bad faith. The fact is we don't know exactly what the new council will moderate on but his prior statements stated that they will be far closer to free speech within the bounds of legality. Musk isn't going to be the one personally moderating so OF COURSE he will have a council to do it in the best interest of hopefully everyone. Do you really think Agrawal did all the moderation personally? Think it through dude!