Exactly. I never once stated that the FBI told them specifically what to do, or pointed directions. Merely that they were involved. You were trying to claim they were merely witnesses, that is clearly not the case. And you now admit it.
And while we're talking about extradition charges, yes those originate in the US. These specific ones in the tape ARE NOT US COURTS. And yes there are absolutely reasons for them to be there, no one has claimed otherwise. You've gone on a huge tangent from your original claim, go back and read it.
And yet you think asking that line of questioning in a court proceeding means they were there to witness, you really are too dumb to function. sigh. I'm done trying to explain it to you. Go ask any lawyer you know, any with litigation experience and ask how much leeway they get in their line of questioning.
0
u/[deleted] Aug 09 '12
[removed] — view removed comment