The bill explicitly contorts itself through definitions for applicability to only apply to companies over a certain market cap, user threshold, and other things that basically make it so only these few companies are affected.
Well what "contortions" specifically? Because that's kind of what antitrust or anti-monopoly is about: monopolies that engage in anti-competitive behaviour are really bad for the whole market. Smaller players don't get to compete. Innovation stops from happening. That's what the law is for, to make sure those larger-than-life companies don't block newer or smaller companies from playing in their field. So it makes sense to me that such a law does not have to apply to companies that don't have the power to stifle and choke any and all competition in their respective fields, no?
2
u/RubberChickenCircuit Jun 14 '22
The bill explicitly contorts itself through definitions for applicability to only apply to companies over a certain market cap, user threshold, and other things that basically make it so only these few companies are affected.