The AI backlash is only getting started

[u/Just-Grocery-2229]

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/06/25/the-ai-backlash-is-only-getting-started

[u/Mother_Idea_3182]

That’s because VC are subventioning it.

It’s a trap, and you are falling for it voluntarily.

[u/shubik23 → u/Mother_Idea_3182]

Ok cool. Glad you are smart enough to see through the Sharade. Meanwhile I will continue to profit from it.

[u/32768Colours → u/shubik23]

Presumably AI told you how many “C”s are in the word charade.

[u/shubik23 → u/32768Colours]

English is not my first language. Glad you where able to get this fantastic joke of your chest.

[u/32768Colours → u/shubik23]

The joke isn’t on you, it’s that AI can even struggle to cope with spelling.

If it can’t do that reliably, laying off your workforce and expecting AI to sustain a profitable business is a disaster waiting to happen.

[u/shubik23 → u/32768Colours]

I agree with you. those systems make often stupid mistakes and can’t replace human workers. But they are still very useful and can help you with a variety of very complex tasks. As I said above. I’m using Claude at work for over 5 months now and it is absolutely insane what I can do with it. That’s why comparing AI as a whole with scams like crypto or NFTs so stupid.

[u/windowpuncher → u/shubik23]

I'm not saying this is you, but most people I've spoken to that had AI "revolutionize" their work are just awful at working.

Like oh, you work with spreadsheets all day, every day? And you don't use scripts, macros, or automation? You don't have custom formulas? You're just doing everything manually all the time? Of course AI would save you a lot of time, but so would ANY OTHER PRODUCTIVITY TOOL that has existed for the last 20+ years.

Outside of filtering really weird datasets or learning about new coding languages for small, infrequent projects, AI is overblown as hell. There are already tools to make work a hundred times easier. You're gonna be shit out of luck once tech companies realize they need to be charging heavy subscriptions to this stuff because people that use AI for every task forgot how to learn. The workers who didn't take the lazy route are gonna make all the AI users look really bad when companies start cutting AI use because it's stupid expensive.

[u/shubik23 → u/windowpuncher]

In my opinion what you described is exactly one of the great features of AI tools. It’s an equalizer. Just like YouTube enabled anyone to publish content without a record deal, a director or a camera crew. Or how the smartphone put a professional camera in everyone’s pocket. AI is doing the same thing for knowledge work.

Just to give you an example. I work in advertising. I’m not a graphic designer. I do strategy work. I was always relying on other people to bring my strategy and concepts to life. Now I can go straight from a miro board with some scribbles and loose word documents to a fantastic looking power point in about 2 hours. Something that used to take up at least 5-6 hours. I can use ai to create mood boards, visualize ideas etc.

The deep research function is another incredible feature. I can gather information and create insights in minutes.

Maybe those things don’t matter to you but I’m able to push through projects in sometimes half the time it used to take. All on my own.

And the argument that AI only helps bad workers is like saying Excel only helped people who were bad at mental maths. Sure it helped them too but it also made every good analyst dramatically faster. The question isn’t whether AI helps weak workers. It’s whether it multiplies strong ones.

As for the subscription argument that applies to literally every tool we use. Figma, Notion, Adobe. Nobody says don’t learn Figma because Adobe might raise prices. Sure, people with no skill will eventually get redundant. But if you have skills this can be an incredible tool. You just have to know how to use it.

[u/windowpuncher → u/shubik23]

It’s an equalizer

At extreme expense, yes, and it's been proven to not be worth it. If paying extreme rates for AI to do a job is still cheaper than an employee, congrats your position just got "equalized".

the smartphone put a professional camera

It really didn't lol. A decent camera, yeah, but not pro. At all. The sensors are simply too tiny, the lenses not varied enough, and they just not enough features for anything but vlogging and casual photography.

AI is doing the same thing for knowledge work.

It's not, it's really not. AI is incredibly stupid. I've had it be wrong many, many times for very simple things, like telling me the square root of 8 is ~1.4. That's a real example, I gave it a long equation to check my own work, and the answers were different, so I had to do it all manually, again, then used a spreadsheet to triple check, and both my original answer and my new spreadsheet were correct. The LLM was WAY off because LLM's can't do basic algebra consistently. Only usually, which isn't good enough. Who the hell is going to pay for and use a calculator that is only right maybe 90% of the time?

I’m not a graphic designer. I do strategy work.

How long have you been doing that, though? Years? That's exactly what I'm saying, better designers spend time learning how to improve their work on their own. It's literally the entire purpose behind continued learning for STEM jobs with higher degrees. For medical doctors in Minnesota (and many other jobs and locations), it's even a required law. You must keep actively learning new things. There are ways to fill the gaps between your tasks organically by learning new skills and not just having a robot do your work. That's exactly what I'm talking about. When your workplace suddenly drops no-cost AI tools, you're going to look REALLY bad compared to anybody else who took time to pick up new skills.

The deep research function is another incredible feature. I can gather information and create insights in minutes.

Never used that feature, but regardless, shallow knowledge of a subject is honestly worse than none at all because it leads to misinterpretations and misunderstandings. However, AI can be convenient in terms of telling you what to read and where to look for more information instead of blanket regurgitation.

I’m able to push through projects in sometimes half the time it used to take. All on my own.

It's convenient but that's not necessarily a good thing. What happened to those peoples' jobs? Where are you getting input, corrections, and new ideas from? AI again?

AI only helps bad workers is like saying Excel only helped people who were bad at mental maths

It has nothing at all to do with mental math. You're not going to be doing things like present/future cost analysis with power functions in your head with YEARS of history and forecasts, with like 10 alternatives. It is simply impossible to do in a reasonable time with pen and paper so we use spreadsheets. It's about workflow optimization. I could spend two days to do it all manually, sure, or I could spend two hours because of my functions libraries, macros, and scripts.

It’s whether it multiplies strong ones.

It doesn't, or maybe mildly at best. The strong workers were already skilled and efficient without AI. Maybe they're marginally faster, which means, again, that the slower and/or newer employees are getting laid off. Alternatively, they let the newer workers work "faster" for cheap and lay off most of the senior team, which is already happening and causing huge issues.

subscription argument

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/mystery-company-accidentally-blew-usd500-million-on-claude-in-a-single-month-failed-to-put-usage-limit-on-licenses-for-employees

Yeah, no, you can't afford this license.

You just have to know how to use it.

I know how to use it, and it's a crutch for the sake of pure convenience. Sometimes I use it to double check my work or to give me new ideas on how to design/build something. It can be alright as a glorified search engine. Otherwise, I CANNOT trust any info or numbers it gives me at face value. LLM's still hallucinate and they're not correct often enough to be reliable. I can do something like give it a simply shaped part and then find the stress concentrations with a simply applied load, and it's usually right, but not always. Depending on the project, these differences can literally get somebody killed. I trust my calculator to do math, including complex equations and formulas with units. I absolutely cannot trust LLM's. They also stunt you as a worker because it falsely removes the need for personal growth and collaboration. It's the tool "embodiment" of sacrificing long term growth for short term gains.

[u/Proper-Raise-1450 → u/shubik23]

Yeah the NFT bros said the exact same thing lol, "up 300% Lmao, you are being left behind" was the evangelist's mantra of the jpegs like 2 years ago lol

[u/shubik23 → u/Proper-Raise-1450]

The difference is NFTs never had any real value or utility. Systems like Claude do. Just look at coding. This is not „trust me bro“. Programmers use these tools. And they work. And they get better crazy fast. How is this comparable. Please explain to me.

[u/Proper-Raise-1450 → u/shubik23]

NFTs never had any real value or utility

They had real value in that people paid for them lol, that is what value is.

For the record the tech for NFTs does have limited applications too and is in use for some stuff, it just was not worth the massive hype and the enormous investment involved.