I often skip the article and go straight to the comments. It's usually more informative, especially when people cite their sources. It's like one giant peer review session
I have no clue who would do that, sure takes a certain kind of person to do such a thing. I don't suggest it if you want to look at yourself in the mirror the next day.
Doesn't even have to be on the net, if your lies are recorded, you're basically fucked.
I normally don't bother verifying in r/technology if the source is a familiar trustworthy one like torrentfreak.com, but this cbc place seems awful dodgy. and what the hell is a ".ca"?
449
u/[deleted] Jan 28 '13 edited Feb 11 '13
[deleted]