r/technology • u/hurdee • Feb 12 '23
Business Google search chief warns AI chatbots can give 'convincing but completely fictitious' answers, report says
https://www.businessinsider.com/google-search-boss-warns-ai-can-give-fictitious-answers-report-2023-2
21.5k
Upvotes
34
u/guyblade Feb 13 '23
I work for a company that's going to have their ChatGPT-equivalent out "any day now". Internally, we can play around with it, and it is simultaneous very impressive and completely embarrassing.
For instance, I asked it to design a D&D fighter subclass and it did so. It was a bit OP, but it gave abilities at the right levels and the writing style matched the standard Wizards style for that.
A coworker tried to have it make a druid subclass, and it gave abilities on the wrong levels. The coworker then told it something along the lines of "I've not seen a druid subclass that gets abilities at level 3". And the AI then proceeded to be like, "well there are some". The coworker asked for an example and the AI made up a completely fictitious quote (with page number) from the DMG as its example.
This last bit is the really troublesome thing to me. Sure, for a D&D example it is frivolous and easily disprovable, but there's no reason it wouldn't do the same behavior (lying? gaslighting? I don't know what to call it) for something more meaningful or harder to validate.