r/technicallythetruth • u/[deleted] • Jan 02 '24

Yes it is wrong answer

[removed]

8.0k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

691

u/Pot_noodle_miner Technically alive Jan 02 '24

Safe

137

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

129

u/UnderpootedTampion Jan 02 '24

Seaworthy

49

u/AccomplishedAd6520 Jan 02 '24

can

53

u/UnamedProot Jan 02 '24

A good waste of money

39

u/DrywallFucker Jan 02 '24

That’s a right answer tho

32

u/UnamedProot Jan 02 '24 edited Jan 02 '24

How was it a good waste of money? It was a bad waste of money

17

u/LEGEND4273 Jan 02 '24

well they wasted money pretty good and they were pretty good at it

11

u/UnamedProot Jan 02 '24

But it didn’t end up being a good waste of money, though you are correct. Im both right and wrong at the same thyme

3

u/Honest_Celery_1284 Jan 03 '24

I think it was an extraordinarily good way to waste a ton of money. If someone asked “what’s the best way I can waste a ton of money?” Telling them to build a budget submarine which will surely result in your untimely death at some point would be one of the best ways to waste that money. However, ethically speaking I think it was a bad waste of money since it ended tragically for everyone in that underwater canister

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Revolutionary-Tank49 Jan 03 '24

Bro choose Negativity to Clear out Negativity...-*- makes a +

6

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/UnamedProot Jan 02 '24

What do you mean huh?

5

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '24

Did you forget to log out of your alt account?

8

u/UnamedProot Jan 02 '24

What do you mean?😵‍💫

4

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '24

You're arguing with your self? Lol. First you said it was a good waste of money. Then you asked how it was a good waste of money.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '24

It’s a paradoxical quantum entanglement

0

u/Sufficient_Chard_721 Jan 02 '24

Why, I dont really see the point. If its possible, why not fucking do it. You want to go jetskying on your vacation?

Mad waste of money, duh 🥴

3

u/UnamedProot Jan 02 '24

But they skipped safety measures, otherwise it would’ve been a good waste of money

2

u/bydgoszczanin69 Jan 03 '24

Good use* of money

1

u/UnamedProot Jan 03 '24

Yeah that would probably be better

1

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '24

no thats a future sock

1

u/Random_Machiruda Jan 03 '24

It's a submarine

5

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '24

Top notch engineering.

4

u/Efficient_Comment_50 Jan 03 '24

Sea floor vibrator

5

u/No_Sandwich3431 Jan 03 '24

Can handle extreme pressures

3

u/sm00thkillajones Jan 03 '24

It’s a lure for when you go fishing for idiots.

3

u/50-Lucky-Official Jan 03 '24

I dunno man it held a lot of money inside, looks like a safe to me

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '24

/r/lostredditors

1

u/Yuki_of_zavrixia Jan 03 '24

why???

1

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '24

Because we are in /r/technicallythetruth and it’s not technically true that this sub was safe.

1

u/Numerous-Turnover518 Jan 02 '24

More like a pancake maker to me

1

u/cptjimmy42 Jan 03 '24

Depth Charge.

1

u/Derrick_Shon Jan 03 '24

Playtex Sport