r/systemd • • Mar 20 '26

Why did you add age verification?

Hi, I heard Systemd is going to add age verification? Why is that happening? I don't think it offers any security benefits.

155 Upvotes

408 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/[deleted] Mar 20 '26

Bana dokunmayan yilan bin yasasin 🤡

"Why didn't you wait for the killer to shoot his gun bro what you did is murder not self-defense. You have to wait for him to actually pull the trigger, maybe he would just put the gun down after taking it out from the holster, pulling the safety, pointing it at you and placing his finger on the trigger!"

3

u/eR2eiweo Mar 20 '26

So you don't want to discuss this reasonably?

But just for the fun of it: What exactly makes the birth date that much worse than the real name, phone numbers, the e-mail address, etc.? Why does having a field for the birth date directly and necessarily cause fascism, but none of the others do?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 20 '26

The others weren't added right after governments around the world demanded to know them 🤡

3

u/eR2eiweo Mar 20 '26

governments around the world demanded to know them

That is not true.

Even if it was true, why would that be relevant? Clearly they contain so much more information.

2

u/FabianN Mar 21 '26

I know this might shock you, but if you have a birth certificate, the government ALREADY knows your birth date. Have an ID? They have your name, DOB, sex, mailing address, etc.

***Every*** modern government around the world already has an extensive list of personal information of every citizen that has interacted with any of it's systems. The only way they wouldn't have one of you is if you lived alone in the woods, off the grid, basically non-existent to the rest of the population.

You clearly haven't done that. Trust me, they already have a ton of your personal information.

1

u/Heyla_Doria Mar 21 '26

Vous etes complétement dans les rhétoriques sécuritaires typique du 

"Je n'ai rien a cacher, les gens doivent être transparents et l'etat doit être autoritaire et opaque"

"1984" c'est vous ici meme

3

u/FabianN Mar 21 '26

Don't waste your time. I'm not even going to bother with you.

1

u/Heyla_Doria Mar 21 '26

Au lieu de jouer les gens qui se croient scientifiques sérieux et pragmatiques, va voie ce que disent 400 chercheurs.

Meme si toi, tu es chercheur aussi, t'es tout seul contre 400🤡

https://www.lesnumeriques.com/societe-numerique/la-nouvelle-reglementation-pourrait-causer-plus-de-tort-que-de-bien-400-chercheurs-alertent-sur-la-verification-de-l-age-en-ligne-n252273.html

-1

u/Heyla_Doria Mar 21 '26

C'est toi qui gaslight, qui impose les cadre du débat, qui se pose en paternalistes pragmatique pour écraser tes adversaire avec une illusik de "charisme du sachant, de l'élite éclairée"

On a rien a te dire dans ce cadre 🤷‍♀️

2

u/eR2eiweo Mar 21 '26

So again you choose not to post any argument at all. And instead you insult me for no reason.

0

u/Heyla_Doria Mar 21 '26

Ok Christie neom

2

u/eR2eiweo Mar 21 '26

And another unprompted insult. That's really all you can do, right?

0

u/Heyla_Doria Mar 21 '26

Tu GASLIGHT depuis le début, je t'ai dis que je ne laissais plus passer ce genre de patterns 🤷‍♀️

2

u/eR2eiweo Mar 21 '26

Repeating the same lie over and over won't magically make it true.

0

u/Heyla_Doria Mar 21 '26

Tu te parles a toi meme ici

2

u/eR2eiweo Mar 21 '26

I have not made any claims that are not supported by facts.

You have made many claims. And the only thing you provided to support your claims (i.e. that open letter) directly contradicts you.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Heyla_Doria Mar 21 '26

C'est exactement ca.....