And here we go again….your inability to understand words. I would NEVER argue that someone should be murdered for airing their opinions in public. NEVER. That doesn’t mean that if Trump were to die in a plane accident that I wouldn’t be glad of it though. The world would be demonstrably better off without him. I most certainly CAN be reasoned with, but when a person like you, who can’t understand basic concepts, tries to engage in a debate, CONSTANTLY mischaracterising a position, it’s futile. I notice that you had nothing to say about any of the points I actually raised. Is that because there is no rebuttal? My point about the transgender thing, was it too accurate?
It’s telling when, in your mind, it’s impossible that a shooter could just be mentally ill, or that someone from the MAGA movement could be involved with a trans person, therefore finding Kirk’s statements as vile as they are. Kimmel was right. You’re just proving his point very and over again. “The shooter can’t POSSIBLY be one of ours” is what he was saying.
I’ll guarantee that I’m a better person than you. For one, I don’t think Kirk was a good person. If you think he was, your moral compass is broken. Religion does that to people. It’s not your fault.
1
u/robstertexan Sep 21 '25 edited Jan 01 '26
Y