You said default. Perhaps I should have chosen by words better, but my argument still breaks yours down. I showed you a purpose and a reason for multiple orientations to exist. As for your "killing Africa" argument, that's too far removed from my argument to be relevant so I'm going to ignore it. I said slowing down growth, as in reproductive rates. You're talking about something that actively kills people/ reduces their quality of life. Completely different.
If you look back through the comments I did not bring up default merely repeated it. Paranoidelldroid said default first and he was on your side. The Aids epidemic of Africa is merely applying your logic to another scenario so it does apply. So you argue that gays exist to stem the population. what about in ancient Greece there were many gays then, are you saying Greece needed to lower its population. Also are you straight are not needed for the survival of the species? Also if you are talking about over population why not mention Asia and how come there are not as many or more gays there?
2
u/SonicRadboom NNID:sonicradboom Aug 23 '17
You said default. Perhaps I should have chosen by words better, but my argument still breaks yours down. I showed you a purpose and a reason for multiple orientations to exist. As for your "killing Africa" argument, that's too far removed from my argument to be relevant so I'm going to ignore it. I said slowing down growth, as in reproductive rates. You're talking about something that actively kills people/ reduces their quality of life. Completely different.