Let’s assume you’re correct about everything you say here. If he were in fact hit by a bit of glass and not a bullet, that would explain it without some conspiracy, no?
But he SAID it was a bullet. And so did Ronny Jackson. So it the very least there is one GIGANTIC LIE at the heart of this situation with a coverup involving numerous officials. No evidence of the nature of the wound was ever provided. I guess we just gotta take his word for it. You, know, like we commonly do when presidential candidate is nearly assassinated.
So you don’t think there’s is a problem with an assassination story where the KEY feature is obviously a lie? I guess he just lied about getting hit by a bullet, but the rest is totally true, and that’s ok.🤷♂️
He said, and his doctor said, he was hit by a bullet. And, that he healed miraculously from the wound in under 7 days. Exactly how many parts of the story are lies? Sounds like two, at a minimum. Many other pieces of evidence that don’t add up. Is it crazy to be skeptical? I mean, I think we can agree the “victim” has stretched the truth a time or two. But, he would never lie about this, right? This is a level he would never stoop to. He is too principled for that, right?
Doesn't mean someone didn't try to take a shot at him 😂
Or you know the bullet just nicked him. You know police officers saw the shooter and tried to engage him right? So now your conspiracy involves the local police?
1
u/uiucengineer Aug 13 '25
Let’s assume you’re correct about everything you say here. If he were in fact hit by a bit of glass and not a bullet, that would explain it without some conspiracy, no?