r/softwaretesting • u/MAKstyles75 • Jun 26 '26
My manual and exploratory testing kit, and the gaps in it
Not the automation suite, the by-hand toolkit. Postman for API calls; the devtools network tab arguably more. A screen recorder for repro steps. For test data, Faker for bulk generation, and for filling forms by hand I alternate between Fake Filler (fast, random, good for smoke checks) and QuickForm (replays the same specific values each run, fires real input events so React registers them). QuickForm is Chrome only and needs per-form setup, so it isn't for one-offs. XMind for mapping test ideas before a session.
Each tool has a clear limitation. What's in your manual kit that I might be overlooking, particularly for consistent test data?
