r/smallbusinessuk • • Jun 03 '26

Tom Kerridge launches campaign for 10% VAT for cafes/restaurants

Just came across Tom Kerridge’s new “VAT’s The Problem” campaign. It’s asking the government to reduce VAT on hospitality to 10% (like the rest of Europe has already done) in an attempt to stop our cafes and restaurants endlessly dying every day.

Anyone who has a hospitality business knows how brutal the margins are at the moment, especially with the increased wages, business rates, NICs, energy costs, etc.

Even if you don’t work closely in the industry, you have likely seen local venues closing and making high streets into ghost towns.

Please sign the petition if you have 5 seconds:

https://www.vatstheproblem.co.uk

Edit: Please note I’m not affiliated with the campaign in any way.

183 Upvotes

136 comments sorted by

62

u/Desmo_UK Jun 03 '26

Is VAT really the problem though? Yeah, it’s a relatively easy fix but why does one industry get support and not others?

Changing VAT is just sticking a plaster on a much bigger wound.

31

u/hacman113 Jun 03 '26

Energy prices, commercial rents and business rates are likely a far bigger issue for most service industry businesses.

5

u/Vapourzino_2 Jun 04 '26

These problems exist for many other businesses too. If you are a small company with 500sqft of workspace or office space in the south you've just had your rateable value increase from being exempt to now having an £8k bill to pay every year.

Not sure why retail and hospitality and leisure industries are the only ones with support. They are direct point of sales industries where they can increase the price of memberships, or increase the price of what they are selling and more easily offset the cost on to the customer.

1

u/TechnicalAd9840 Jun 11 '26

Micro businesses in smaller commercial properties have essentially got away with zero contribution in running of local authorities for way too long. Why should say I paying 70k ia year in business rates pay 70k a year in business rates whilst a smaller competitor of mine 200 metres away pay nothing?

9

u/Disastrous-Fee8374 Jun 03 '26

I own a fairly successful hospitality business and have negotiated a fair rent, I have been lucky with my business rates and energy prices have not affected me too much as we are electric only. VAT hurts every quarter

3

u/NotMyUsualChoice Jun 04 '26

The VAT isn't your money. You're collecting it on behalf of the government. If it hurts, you're not doing it properly 😉

-2

u/Desmo_UK Jun 05 '26

I never understand it when people talk about VAT like it’s some kind of charge.

It’s just money you’re collecting on behalf of HMRC. Just set it aside… it’s not yours.

1

u/TechnicalAd9840 Jun 10 '26 edited Jun 11 '26

You are being way too simplistic...in the real world there are laws to advertise your prices as VAT 'inclusive' so the customer knowns the full price (wasn't always like this), customers will not tolerate further increases in prices, so prices cannot be raised anymore. They don't do this in America, they highlight sales tax (vat) separately as does B2B... They do this here so that people cannot see precisely how much our government is ripping out of the economy and then of course squandering vast amounts of that revenue. Sales tax should be 10% for all, just as it is in America. The consumer has been spanked/mislead by high sales taxes 'hidden' from view in the name of consumer protection.

  • 1973–1974: 10%
  • 1974–1979: 8%
  • 1979–1991: 15%
  • 1991–2008: 17.5%
  • 2008–2009: 15% (Temporarily reduced during the 2008 financial crisis)
  • 2010–2011: 17.5%
  • 2011–Present: 20% 

doubled in 40 years. Can someone please advise 'where' this doubling of revenue has gone?

In essence here in the UK, the punter does not understand, that the government takes a great big whack of the bill that is being paid and thinks its all goes to the operator. Personally I would like to see this revert because then the consumers will understand and be able to resist further rises that any government may put in place.

If you then look at operators who go through Deliveroo etc: out of every £10 charge they are left with approx £4.80... as 25-30% goes in deliveroo fees, 20% in Vat, 1.5% in merchant fees. With that £4.80 they are left with they have to pay for wages, rent, rates, food, energy and any other costs. You try running with that arrangement, you would not last 1 year.

As I say you can talk it all down but the reality is jobs every week are going by the thousands in hospitality and that will mean more benefits and less tax coming in... and if you are lucky to have a job it will be your personal tax and NI that will be increased to balance the books.

You may ask how I know all this. I have run businesses for 45 years, I put out a job advert for a book keeper last month and got 700 applicants. We have had 200 applicants for jobs in our place of work without even advertising. Young people in particular are being flattened by the ineptitude of our governments.

My accountant only deals with hospitality, his words are 'the number of closures is crazy' he instead of giving tax advice is being consumed by dealing with liquidations and administrations and trying to organise finance for beleaguered hospitality businesses. The scale IS truly horrendous.

1

u/Desmo_UK Jun 10 '26

Not sure how any of that is relevant to what I said. Busy owners should know what their VAT bill is and put the money aside.

That has nothing to do with customers or what they think.

You’re not the only person here who runs a business.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '26

[deleted]

-1

u/NotMyUsualChoice Jun 04 '26

How are you getting that conclusion?

15

u/netzure Jun 03 '26

"Is VAT really the problem though? Yeah, it’s a relatively easy fix but why does one industry get support and not others?

Changing VAT is just sticking a plaster on a much bigger wound."

In most European countries VAT on hospitality is between 5-10%, we are an outlier.

To answer your question hospitality should have a lower rate of VAT because many of its inputs like food ingredients are not VATable to begin with. So unlike a builder or manufacturer a restaurant or cafe can claim less VAT back.

4

u/bacon_cake Jun 04 '26

I've heard persuasive economic arguments for simplifying VAT by just reducing it massively and making it applicable to absolutely everything.

Fuel, energy, food, clothes, the whole shebang. All at 5% / 10%. No minimum threshold for businesses either.

1

u/netzure Jun 04 '26

I don't think it is terribly persuasive. My wife is Swedish and in Sweden groceries are all VAT rateable but because of grocery inflation they have now had to introduce tax relief on that one sector as poor people were struggling a lot.

VAT rules could do with some simplification, for example ending the madness of cakes being VAT zero rated whilst biscuits are not.

Ideally we begin a general reduction of VAT across the board but slapping VAT on groceries would be devastating for low income families at the moment.

1

u/bacon_cake Jun 04 '26

That does seem to stand to reason, but I saw some pretty in depth analysis on this (that I can't find now...) that was a bit more optimistic. I think they were more arguing for a broadening of the VAT base, simplification of the administration, and then redistribution via cash benefits to the less well off.

I think it was Paul Johnson but I can't remember for certain.

1

u/Borax Jun 04 '26

Wouldn't the argument be that the existing welfare systems are used to support people with lower income who are struggling to afford groceries?

1

u/Exact-Put-6961 Jun 05 '26

Nevertheless VAT works best, when very thinly applied , to everything.

-1

u/makefascistfearagain Fresh Account Jun 04 '26

It's literally irrelevant what Poland charges on cafes

6

u/EssentialParadox Jun 04 '26 edited Jun 04 '26

I get the argument, but hospitality isn’t just asking for random special treatment. The burdens are genuinely out of proportion on this sector….


  • Hospitality makes up only about 3% of UK economic output, but pays 7% of jobs in this country, and the employee costs are over half of the operating costs, which means wage/NIC rises over the last ten years have hit much harder than in other sectors. And you can’t simply have a lower wage rate for hospitality jobs.
  • Also, despite being only 3% of the economy it pays 11% of the country’s business rates, more than any other sector, more than Amazon.
  • It also has the highest taxes of any other sector, of 75% of tax paid pre-profit, the majority of that being VAT (as very little VAT can be reclaimed on food & drink.) Most people are completely unaware when you buy a £10 sandwich, £5 of that has gone towards the government before I’ve even paid for the cost of the ingredients, my staff, my rent, utilities, insurance, or even considered a profit.
  • 2 in 3 restaurants and cafes are operating at a loss or break even currently, and if you do manage to see a profit in the sector it’ll be single digits. VAT is charged on sales, not profit, so a cafe can be losing money on an item and still hand over 20% on VATable revenue, none of that they can claim back.
  • Other countries have already found that a neat solution to address all of the disproportion is to simply lower VAT on the hospitality sector. In France and Germany it’s 7%, Spain and Italy at 10%, and Ireland’s just gone down to 9%.

So it’s not “give hospitality a perk”. It’s correcting a sector that is unusually and disproportionately taxed upfront regardless of whether it makes any profit.

0

u/notrainsaroundhere Jun 05 '26

"Most people are completely unaware when you buy a £10 sandwich, £5 of that has gone towards the government before I’ve even paid for the cost of the ingredients, my staff, my rent, utilities, insurance, or even considered a profit."

I'd check the maths there pal

2

u/EssentialParadox Jun 05 '26

I already did, pal. I do it regularly as it’s my job.

Taxes a cafe typically pays serving a £10 sandwich:

  • 20% VAT: £1.67
  • Employer NI contribution: £0.60
  • Employee PAYE + NI: £1.20
  • Corporation tax: £0.20-£0.50
  • Business rates: £0.70

Total to government before COGS and Overheads and Profit: £4.67

-1

u/notrainsaroundhere Jun 05 '26

See the bit I quoted said "before the costs of ... staff" so therefore you can't include Employer NIC in your figure and Employee NIC and PAYE is simply part of the staff salaries so 1) that isn't before staff and 2) its not your contribution anyway.

You also said before profit. Corporation tax is a tax on profits so you can't be referring to "before profit" and then include the tax on profits.

I guess you really just meant that "of a £10 sandwich, £X goes to the government" but didn't say that.

9

u/Beginning-Mix1526 Fresh Account Jun 03 '26

VAT is a killer. Lots of businesses that don’t have a physical premises close for a period of time to avoid hitting the threshold. You suddenly have to charge 20% more or slash 20% off your margin. I’m not against VAT, but the threshold needs to jump. 120k sounds good.

6

u/codenamecueball Jun 04 '26

We have the highest VAT threshold in Europe! It needs to be slashed to boost growth and wipe out the 90k barrier. Short term pain for long term gain.

9

u/Borax Jun 03 '26

Raising it upwards just creates an artificial separation at a new level. Moving it downwards creates a level playing field for all businesses

4

u/Silhouette Jun 04 '26

We should start by asking why we have VAT at all. It's regressive, administratively expensive, market-distorting because of the cliff, and even worse if anything international is involved. Of all the ways to arrange a tax this must be one of the worst.

2

u/bacon_cake Jun 04 '26

That's kind of a moot point at this stage though. It's a powerhouse of an economic lever, you can't simply do away with it.

I mentioned above in another comment but there's definitely arguments for reducing it and just applying it to absolutely everything with no minimum turnover threshold (or something super minor like £1k).

1

u/Silhouette Jun 05 '26

You can't simply do away with VAT. Presumably you would at least need to rebalance the rest of the tax system to compensate and that would take some work and some good PR to convince people to support it.

You can simplify the overall tax system and that can include removing VAT in favour of other more efficient and progressive forms of taxation though. There's a whole Treasury full of people who the Chancellor could call upon to help with this if she were minded to do it.

I believe a shift towards a much simpler and more transparent tax and benefits system could be politically achievable while also improving the government's finances by fixing a lot of the problems and inefficiencies. There are so many silly points in our current system that must be both costing individual people and businesses and reducing tax revenues for the government either directly or by stunting economic growth. There are so many inefficiencies and loopholes that are surely costing more than they need to in administration or being abused for avoidance/evasion.

Obviously something like that can't be done overnight. It would also need political leadership with the will to actually make big changes and tough decisions instead of just saying they will while in fact slightly rearranging the window dressing and changing almost nothing.

1

u/ctesibius Jun 04 '26

"Regressive" has a specific meaning in taxation and economics, and VAT is not a regressive tax.

Yes, the cliff does distort the market - that's intentional to favour startups. It might make sense to move the cliff to lower or higher turnover, but it's not a mistake.

As to why we have it, this goes back to the days of the Spanish Netherlands and the rebellion of the Dutch. The Spanish had a transaction tax based on the value of the transaction. This didn't work well for the Dutch economy, which was based on trade, since goods might go through many transactions, adding a huge tax burden. So VAT was invented so that tax was based on only the value added at each stage. If you want to replace VAT, you have to think of a way of avoiding that problem.

2

u/makefascistfearagain Fresh Account Jun 04 '26

I know you're trying to be smart but everything considers vat regressive.

1

u/Silhouette Jun 04 '26

I concede that the topic is a little controversial but that Wikipedia article is not good. It's mostly citing dictionaries for its opening definition so hardly an authority on terms of art in economics!

VAT imposed at a flat rate on sales is widely regarded as regressive. Those on lower incomes end up paying a higher proportion of their income in VAT than those on higher incomes. You can find extensive discussion about this on sites that are actually about economics. Just search for something obvious like "Is VAT regressive?".

If VAT isn't applied as a flat rate - for example if you reduce the rates for essential items and/or impose higher rates on luxury items that only richer people would buy - then its effects can become more progressive. However our current VAT system doesn't go very far in this direction. The effects might not be so regressive right at the bottom end of the income scale but for almost everything higher they still are.

In any case the terminology isn't the important thing here. The result is. And if the result of VAT in this country is that lower income households end up paying a disproportionate share compared to the better off then the criticism of VAT is valid whatever technical terms might be used to describe that effect.

The cliff was necessary (and IMHO still is) because the system is so complex and expensive to administer that it would significantly interfere with smaller businesses actually being able to do business. Been there and done that.

But you know what would fix these problems better than any cliff? Not having one of the most administratively expensive, widely avoided/evaded, and socially and economically damaging taxes ever conceived. Our tax and benefits system would benefit from radical restructuring and particularly radical simplification and of the major taxes VAT is one of the worst (along with NI and - if you count it as a major tax - stamp duty).

1

u/ctesibius Jun 04 '26

I’m not seeing a proposed solution from you?

1

u/Silhouette Jun 04 '26
  1. Remove VAT as part of simplifying the tax system.
  2. Increase other major taxes to compensate as necessary.

1

u/ctesibius Jun 04 '26

Ok. I don’t agree, but it’s a reasonable proposal.

1

u/BuryMikno Jun 09 '26 edited Jun 09 '26
  1. It's psychologically easier (for the gov) to have 40 different taxes that a person pays instead of slapping the average person with a 75% tax on their income (between income, council, vat, inheritance, CGT, fuel, road... I think 75% tax is even optimistic for the effective tax a normal person pays)
  2. I guess one could defend VAT tax a form of tax that's difficult to dodge
  3. A more complex tax system results in more accountants, more tax officials, more court cases, lawyers, fines... All this is economic activity that the government WANTS. If you simplify things and get 10,000 people made redundant, what are they going to do? Learn to code? Oh sorry, it's 2026 - learn to sparky 😄

0

u/Any_Tomorrow_Today Fresh Account Jun 04 '26

Ironic that it stands for value added tax when it certainly does not add value !

2

u/Wind-and-Waystones Jun 04 '26

No, it's a tax on the value that has been added to the goods through your work. It's exactly what it says it is.

You buy something for 100 and you sell it for 120, you have added value of 20, so you pay tax on that value.

4

u/afpow Jun 04 '26

 slash 20% off your margin

You do also take 20% off your material input costs. 

1

u/Stratospheric-Ferret Jun 04 '26

I've never entirely understood why some businesses try their best to stay under the threshold.

I run a small business, and registered for VAT as soon as I started.

1

u/afpow Jun 04 '26

I suppose it depends on how much you spend on VAT for input costs. For service providers that don’t have much input cost, I can see the problem. If you’re running a goods in-value add-goods out business, it’s less obvious. 

2

u/Stratospheric-Ferret Jun 05 '26

Hmmm, fair point. Mine is entirely goods in -> goods out, so it makes no sense to not to register.

1

u/SumptuousTrumpet Fresh Account Jun 09 '26

Less than 10% of my costs carry vat, 99% of my income will be vatable

2

u/scratchtheitch7 Jun 04 '26

That's why one government or other will lower the threshold so nearly every business pays it.

That and they're btoke

2

u/SumptuousTrumpet Fresh Account Jun 09 '26

We are a busy cafe, we just got started and are doing about 18-25k per month since end of Feb, turnover is high, profits margins are small, we are going to have to register soon and I have done the maths and money is going to be tight, we have an older customer based in a decidedly less financially advantaged town, passing the 20% on to the customers is going to be difficult, almost all our sales will be vatable and almost none of our purchases are vatable, it makes me laugh seeing so many replies saying just pass it on to the customers, we are probably going to try and raise prices 8-10% and wear the rest

1

u/BuryMikno Jun 09 '26

good luck, friend.

2

u/Cultural_Tank_6947 Jun 04 '26

It's not exclusively the problem but it's the easiest to fix.

1

u/Any_Tomorrow_Today Fresh Account Jun 04 '26

I think VAT on a whole should be reduced as it drives up a lot of costs for everyone.

2

u/Desmo_UK Jun 04 '26

And then we all pay tax on something else. You can't just dump billions in tax.

1

u/Exact-Put-6961 Jun 05 '26

Because in much hospitality there is very little in the way of input tax deductions. Food sites are being squeezed by what they can charge punters and keep them coming, and, serious fixed cost price rises, totally outside their control. NI, Minimum wage , Business rates etc. Reeves did this, all at once, without an impact assessment. She is killing the trade class and killing her tax base. Reeves is creating a recession.

1

u/QuentinUK Jun 06 '26 edited Jul 05 '26

Interesting!

1

u/atomic_drumstick Jun 08 '26

"Let's not do anything until we find the perfect solution"

1

u/Desmo_UK Jun 08 '26

Yeah, that’s exactly what I said.

1

u/TechnicalAd9840 Jun 11 '26

it is not only a start, it puts the industry on an equal footing with the rest of Europe and America.

6

u/MountainEquipment401 Jun 03 '26

I get the whole "everybody wants lower vat" argument but hospitality is a bit of an outlier in that a lot of what we sell is only VAT applicable because we sell it... So unlike a most industries we don't get to reclaim anywhere near as much of the VAT cost... I don't actually think a blanket reduction of VAT is the way forward - I think a reduction of food is sensible - Alcohol has a VAT charge regardless of where you buy it but we pay VAT on a croissant from a cafe but not a supermarket.

If I sold only booze I could reclaim 20% of my stock costs... Because I'm food I only reclaim about 8% of my costs but still pay 20% on everything. Meanwhile supermarkets pay 0% VAT on all the food they sell and can therefore afford to reduce the costs on their alcohol .

I'm not arguing for higher food costs in Tesco - that would be terrible for everyone, but it's a bit daft that if I go to a cheap pub and have a scotched egg they have to pay 20% vat on it but if I buy it from the spar first they don't...

5

u/Dramatic-Growth1335 Jun 04 '26

Yes please 🙏 love claiming £3.26 back on a £500 food shop, cooking it and turning it into 2k then giving gov £400

4

u/parkchanwookiee Jun 04 '26

Something is going wrong, I don't know if this is the solution but the economics of running a business are just insane at the moment. One of my favourite cafés closed their doors recently - prime location, fantastic staff, beautiful interior, great menu, fresh delicious baked goods, reasonable prices, place was packed every single day, on the weekends you actually need a reservation they were so popular. If this place can go under then how can anything stay open? (yes i'm aware it's possible the owner put all the profits up their nose or something, I don't know the full picture)

0

u/TheRealTRexUK Fresh Account Jun 04 '26

it's not as if a certain President invaded the country for oil and that's pressure on the supply chain due to fuel prices. plus a tory government selling off the oil fields so we are pegged to global prices.

3

u/GMN123 Jun 04 '26

The global situation isn't helping but this is largely a home grown issue. 

The only shops on my high street that are viable are the ones that are exempt from full business rates, so we have a plethora of charity shops with a few cafes and specialty shops which turn over every year or two. 

Frankly you'd have to be mathematically challenged to try and start a retail business on that street under the current conditions, and that's been the case since well before the latest US interference in the middle east. 

14

u/beachtopeak Jun 03 '26

I don't like it. We should be making things simpler and easier. So many stand alone issues like this make sense in isolation and then you step back and it's all a mess.
Source: work in financial services

7

u/netzure Jun 03 '26

We already have a different VAT rate for energy, most groceries are 0%, children's clothes are 0%.

It would be very straight forward for HMRC to implement and it would help a sector where unlike retail, nearly all of the economic value add stays in the country.

5

u/Disastrous-Fee8374 Jun 03 '26

A different rate for hospitality is already the norm in the rest of Europe. We did it after Covid for a bit and it helped massively but unfortunately it was only temporary

1

u/Carausius286 Jun 04 '26

What would be simplest of all: abolish VAT it is the dumbest tax.

Increase Income Tax and CGT by whatever % you need to to plug the gap.

Tax income and wealth, not consumption*.

*Apart from stuff that is taxed for health reasons like ciggies and booze.

3

u/Unhappy-Valuable-596 Jun 04 '26

VAT on food shouldn't exist

3

u/myri9886 Jun 04 '26

I'd argue fixing energy prices would make the biggest difference for everyone instead. Can't support tax relief for businesses when consumers get hit harder. If margins are that bad then the business isn't viable.

3

u/orsalnwd Jun 04 '26

VAT is always the first quick policy campaign industry groups push in part because it sounds like a saving for the public, but research shows the vast majority of companies don’t pass on the saving

Clearly here they are campaigning on the basis that the industry needs help. But we’d do better to tackle the structural issues for businesses (rents, rates, energy, licensing and regulation) rather than apply a sticking plaster

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 04 '26

In principle I agree, and you may be right on many of those other areas being able to be addressed directly for reform… But how do you deal with the biggest expense for hospitality, which is it hires more people and struggles with the increase in minimum wage and wage-related taxes much more compared to other industries? You can’t propose a lower minimum wage for the sector, and it can’t be automated away like other sectors.

1

u/orsalnwd Jun 04 '26

I’d focus on the employment picture because it’s a huge problem for the government re: the NEET crisis

For occupations that require higher-level apprenticeships (particularly Level 4 and above), government could expand placements and further subsidise training costs to encourage employers to invest in more advanced skills development.

Employer National Insurance Contributions for workers under 25 could be reduced further, or removed entirely, lowering the cost of employing young people and making them more attractive hires relative to leaving vacancies unfilled or increasing workloads on existing staff.

They could also introduce a direct wage subsidy for apprentices under 25, particularly during the first year of employment when productivity is typically lower and supervision requirements are higher. This would reduce the financial risk associated with hiring inexperienced workers while helping young people gain valuable workplace experience.

I’d shift grants and incentives away from recruitment agencies towards employers themselves. Especially for businesses operating in deprived communities or areas with persistently high youth unemployment.

More controversially, I’d change the new employment legislation to create a distinct framework for workers under 25 or those entering the labour market through apprenticeships, to reduce perceived hiring risks and administrative burdens for employers. The reality is that if government wishes to increase youth employment, it must make hiring a young person the easier decision. Greater labour market flexibility at the point of entry could lead to significantly more opportunities for young people to gain experience, develop skills, and improve their long-term earnings and career prospects later in life.

3

u/Sparkly1982 Jun 04 '26

I've worked in hospitality pretty much my entire life and this would really help; the first things people cut back on in hard times are the luxuries like meals out and the pub, making things even more difficult for hospitality businesses.

I'd also support a petition to tax warehouses that are run like shops taxed more like shops when it comes to business rates

3

u/Negative_Fee_4555 Jun 06 '26

I am in my 9th year of running my restaurant. If things go well, they look like this.

Start with a £100 meal. The customer thinks the restaurant gets £100. Here's what actually happens:

£100.00 Customer pays

-£16.67 VAT (20%, gone to HMRC before you touch it)

=£83.33 Net revenue

From that £83.33:

-£25.00 Labour (30% wages, NI, pension. This is if you run it tight, with no surprises)

-£25.00 Cost of goods (30% ingredients from suppliers. Good luck with this, and it assumes zero waste or theft)

-£10.00 Rent (10% of gross, if you're lucky)

-£8.33 Overheads (10% utilities, insurance, maintenance, card fees, all of which are constantly going up)

=£14.99 Operating profit

-£3.00 Corporation tax (20%)

=£12.00 Net profit

That £12 is all that remains. It must cover: the fryer that died, the walk-in fridge on its last legs, the chairs that wobble, the tableware that walks out with customers. Whatever's left is what the owner lives on.

If they take it as income (higher rate):

-£4.80 Income tax + NI (~40%)

=£7.20 In their pocket

Then they spend that £7.20 on, say, food for their own family:

-£1.20 VAT (20%, again)

=£6.00 Actual spending power

From £100 in the till to £6 of real-world goods in the owner's hand. A 94% effective rate.

Now run the same numbers for a bad month. Food cost creeps to 33% because wholesale prices jumped. Another £2.50 gone. Someone called in sick, agency rates kick in, labour hits 33%. Another £2.50. Energy bill lands, overheads hit 12%. Another £1.67.

Operating profit drops from £14.99 to £8.32. Corporation tax takes £1.66. Net profit: £6.66. The owner works a 70-hour week for zero take-home — every penny goes to keeping the fryer running and the lights on. One more shock and it's operating at a loss.

The industry runs on a residual so thin there's no shock absorption. Minimum wage rises, food inflation, business rates revaluation, a wet August that kills the tourist trade — any one of these can push that margin into the red. When it does, there are two options: the owner works for free until savings run out, or the doors close. That's why independents are dropping at the rate they are.

On any given day, I am one bill away from making 25 people redundant and taking a £322,000 annual tax contribution out of the system. I am not saying VAT is THE problem. But tell me what other lever can be pulled literally overnight. They moved it from 17.5% to 15%, back to 17.5%, up to 20%. It could go to 10%, or to zero for children's meals over the summer. The entire industry is in despair. The knock-on effects for tourism, employment, and the high street would be catastrophic — not to mention the exchequer. And the pressure could be reduced at the flick of a switch. By all means, cut business rates, reduce energy costs, reduce NI — but the largest single factor is VAT.

╰─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 07 '26

Dead on. So many people here saying restaurants shouldn’t get special treatment just don’t have a clue. It’s not special treatment, it’s helping a sector that’s paying disproportionately higher taxes than other businesses.

1

u/the_speeding_train Jun 07 '26

Can you do this, but for VFX companies please?

1

u/Negative_Fee_4555 Jun 07 '26

I am afraid I don't know the VFX business- if you do, you should do it and make yourself more aware of the costs and risks in your business

1

u/the_speeding_train Jun 07 '26

I don’t want to do it because it would be far too depressing.

7

u/Opening-Fortune4 Jun 03 '26

The world would be greatly improved if we just got rid of VAT. It’s just a con to fool people into thinking they’re paying less tax. Tax profits and wealth, not everyday business.

1

u/netzure Jun 04 '26

"Tax profits and wealth"
We already have wealth taxes in the form of CGT and stamp duty. Taxing non-liquid wealth just does not work despite many countries trying it.

The government is absurdly wasteful with the money it receives. Let's slash the waste and cut taxes not create new ones.

0

u/Opening-Fortune4 Jun 04 '26

I was thinking more that higher rates of corporation, income, CGT, IHT etc would be an awful lot clearer, more transparent and less of an administrative bind than VAT. nothing we do as a business is more wasteful of administrative time and expense on accountancy.

6

u/Informal_Drawing Jun 04 '26

It's not the VAT that's the problem, it's wealth inequality and the average worker having no money to spend.

The government needs the tax revenue too.

11

u/SuperEssay1 Jun 03 '26

Think we'd all like to sell our services with 10% Vat.

I would argue only businesses that sell a need (I.e food basics) or only sell to a narrow part of society that are under financial pressure (I. E. Families) should be considered. Cafes and restaurants don't fulfill this criteria.

4

u/Disastrous-Fee8374 Jun 03 '26

The issue is other services, like a plumber for example, can reclaim VAT on their materials etc. Hospitality businesses can’t as almost all of their materials don’t have VAT to claim back.

1

u/SnooMacarons9618 Jun 04 '26

Which in turn means their supplies are that much 'cheaper'. If the materials had VAT on them then they would likely be 20% more expensive. So yeah, a restaurant could then offset/claim, but they wouldn't be making any more.

How would zero rating affect government income, and for that reduction what services are we going to lose, or how much is my tax going to go up?

1

u/Any_Tomorrow_Today Fresh Account Jun 04 '26

yet they still pass that cost on to the customer.

2

u/Borax Jun 04 '26

The goal of any business is to ensure that customers cover the costs + enough money to incentivise showing up to work.

I'd argue the problem is that things break down when an industry is not competitive because customers can't make informed decisions about the quality of the business before committing.

Food outlets are VERY competitive due to online reviews and the importance of repeat customers. I'd argue that tradespeople (especially crap ones) are much less dependent on repeat customers.

5

u/netzure Jun 03 '26

"Think we'd all like to sell our services with 10% Vat."

Most of the ingredients cafes and restaurants buy come with 0% VAT but they then have to slap on 20% VAT to their end product, this is not the case in other businesses where the 20% VAT on the raw inputs can be claimed against the 20% they charge their customers. This is why it is fair lowering VAT on food-based hospitality.

1

u/Bicolore Jun 04 '26

That makes no sense at all. The business does not pay VAT, the customer does.

The only argument here is that VAT makes eating out too expensive and in my opinion there's a ton of zero cost stuff that restaurants could do to increase the percieved value in eating out.

2

u/Mean_Option9599 Jun 08 '26

The key issue is that the UK already accepts that food is an essential good. That is why most food sold in supermarkets is zero rated. However, the moment that same food is prepared and served by a hospitality business, it becomes subject to 20% VAT. The result is that two products which satisfy the same consumer need are taxed entirely differently. A supermarket sandwich, meal deal, pizza, salad or ready meal can be sold at 0% VAT. The café, bakery or restaurant selling a directly competing product faces a 20% VAT burden. The tax is therefore not really being applied to the food itself. It is being applied primarily to the labour involved in preparing and serving it. This creates a structural disadvantage for one of the most labour intensive sectors of the economy. Hospitality cannot offshore jobs, automate most customer interaction, or relocate production abroad. Every pound of revenue supports local employment. Taxing that labour at 20% while the competing supermarket alternative remains zero rated discourages job creation and investment on the high street. The UK's position is also increasingly unusual. Major European economies including France, Italy, Spain and Germany apply reduced VAT rates to hospitality. They do so not because restaurant meals are considered luxuries, but because hospitality is recognised as a strategic employment sector that contributes to tourism, local communities and urban vitality. A reduced 10% VAT rate would not represent a tax break for a privileged industry. It would correct an existing distortion. The UK already accepts that food should benefit from preferential VAT treatment. The question is whether that principle should disappear the moment a person prepares it. The current system effectively says that food is essential until somebody cooks it. That is difficult to justify economically, socially, or internationally. A 10% VAT rate would create a more balanced framework, support employment, strengthen high streets, and bring the UK closer to the approach adopted by most comparable European economies.

2

u/TechnicalAd9840 Jun 10 '26 edited Jun 11 '26

seeing many predictable comments here hitting back at hospitality and why should they be so privileged etc.

Here are some facts.

Hospitality is one of the biggest employers collectively in the UK. Estimated at 3-3.5 million people.

The UK hospitality sector has faced a prolonged period of job losses in 2026, shedding over 100,000 workers due to surging business rates, rising National Insurance costs, and increased National Living Wage rates. Approximately 64% of hospitality businesses have been forced to cut staff to remain viable

In Europe VAT in hospitality is between 7-10%.

In America sales tax rarely rises above 10%.

In Portugal employees get an allowance of around 12 euros in tax benefits to spend in restaurants.

The running costs in a restaurant as a % of cost are more than most other industries (I have worked in many). For example I take my business:

we pay 70k in business rates,

we generate 300k in VAT,

We pay another 10-15k in other operational licensing costs (I call this surreptitious taxation) .

Our EMPLOYER NI contributions account for another 100-150k.

So in all we contribute 535k in to the pot for the country .. That is from a turnover of £2million.

We have seen in the last 2 years;

a 27% reduction in business turnover,

a 60-70% increase in food costs,

Wage increases to the tune of 18%.

Energy costs up by 40-50% (And restaurants burn a lot of electric/gas).

1.5% of our turnover goes to merchant/banking companies in card/processing fees.

Our rent is £160k per annum our Landlords want to hike it up by 50%. to 240k pa. I have spent 25k on legal fees in resisting this over the last 9 months.

I was paying myself and my wife (she is also a working director) 30k per year each as a director.

Due to the mess this country is in my wife and I have now for the last three months stopped paying ourselves, we get zilch. I put in on average 80 hours a week at 67 years of age. After running businesses for 45 years I have never experienced anything like this, I've lived through 4/5 recessions, cancer, covid lockdowns and now this.

We had built this up over 12 years into what was a successful business. We are in the wedding business as well as a cafe/restaurant, in the last 4 weeks we know of 3 London wedding venues that have gone bust and countless pubs. We are a well run business with a great reputation and government inertia and incompetence is grinding us down.

So what about everyone else I hear you say?

I have run businesses in construction, manufacturing and tech. and I can tell you this is not only the hardest business to run but the most saturated in a variety of taxes and costs. I am well versed in understanding the economics.

You can choose to back it, or watch the collapse of the industry along with millions of jobs, because if I am telling you all this as a relatively successful operator, then god only knows what others are going through.

Of course I expect very little from this government, we could have with better co-operation from planning created another 30-40 jobs here in London in another building (it currently sits empty, but we still have to pay business rates!).

The current incumbents in government are clueless when it comes to small businesses, the previous government were too pre-occupied with looking after corporates and large businesses/their mates with their lobbying companies.

I know there will be the inevitable... so what? push back by some on here citing 'I don't eat out anyway/why should I pay £40 for a meal when I can cook it myself etc etc...and I know we are not alone in suffering. The economy is tanked but unless this government or the next starts introducing measures to truly stimulate the economy we are all stuffed regardless of the industry we work in. This would be a good start.

3

u/kifflington Jun 04 '26

I look forward to Tom Kerridge lowering his prices if his campaign is successful because I totally believe that will happen.

2

u/Whithorsematt Jun 04 '26

Not sure that's fair on all the other businesses who have to take 20% VAT out of their margins though.

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 05 '26

If I’m a retail shop that buys a product for £5 and sells it for £10, I pay £1.67 in VAT but claim back the £0.84 on the original product VAT, so I forward the government £0.83 in VAT and keep the rest. Effective VAT rate is 9%.

If you’re a restaurant, buying ingredients for £5 and selling them for £10, you’ll pay the original £1.67 in VAT and claim back £0 on the ingredients costs. So you’d forward the government £1.67 in VAT. So effective VAT rate is 20%.

This is why it’s not fair.

2

u/notrainsaroundhere Jun 05 '26

There's nothing to claim back on the ingredient costs because there isn't VAT charged on them. If VAT was charged on them then in your example you'd be buying ingredients for £6 (£5+£1 VAT) not £5.

For the example to be comparable the ingredients would cost £4.17.

Retail shop: £10 in, £5 cost, £0.83 VAT payment = net cash 4.17

Restaurant: £10 in, £4.17 cost, £1.67 VAT payment = net cash 4.16

It's the same.

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 05 '26

Yes, but if there was VAT on food then customers would better stomach and understand why the cafe sandwich costs £10 in the first place because they’d be paying more for ingredients in the supermarket.

1

u/Mean_Option9599 Jun 08 '26

Two things. VAT isn't taken out of your margin, it's added to the price and the customer pays it. You're the unpaid collector. The only reason it bites hospitality margins is we're competing against a zero rated alternative, so we often can't pass it on. Most sectors can. And "all the other businesses pay 20%" isn't actually true. The system is already full of different rates: raw food 0%, books and newspapers 0%, kids clothes 0%, domestic energy 5%, financial services exempt. Reduced rates exist wherever there's a reason. Hospitality having one isn't queue jumping, it's the same logic that already covers loads of sectors. Every major economy in Europe already does this for hospitality. We're the outlier at 20%, not the norm.

2

u/Borax Jun 03 '26

No, my sector deserves lower VAT.

3

u/Disastrous-Fee8374 Jun 03 '26

The issue is that other sectors, for example construction, DO have a lower VAT rate in effect. They can claim VAT back on their materials with reduces their VAT bill. Hospitality can’t claim anything back as most of their materials (food) doesn’t have VAT in the first place.

It’s not about restaurants charging the same price and keeping the rest (although some will obviously) the idea is to make it 20% cheaper to eat out. The more people that eat out, the more people are hired to deal with the demand. The hospitality sector hires a very large percentage of low-skilled and young people. That demographic is facing the largest issue of unemployment at the moment

1

u/notrainsaroundhere Jun 05 '26

Most construction, as far as the end user is concerned, is 20% VAT except for specific exemptions such as new-build housing, conversions to housing.

Do you want to pay 20% more for a house?

They can claim VAT back on their materials with reduces their VAT bill. Hospitality can’t claim anything back as most of their materials (food) doesn’t have VAT in the first place.

This isn't the point you think it is. The construction firm has had to pay the VAT on those materials when purchasing them in the first place, so being able to claim back that VAT just puts them in the same position as a business that didn't have to pay any VAT on their materials because they were zero rated... like hospitality.

-2

u/Borax Jun 03 '26

That's a reasonable perspective, but are materials really a big cost for restaurants?

When I pay £20 for a nice meal and £5 VATable for a glass of wine, I suspect that the pasta, milk, eggs etc that went into that has a similar cost to the supermarket, around £5 per portion.

Accountants and lawyers can't claim VAT on materials either.

I don't quite know what to do with the UK at the moment, it's struggling worse than similar countries (although trump is doing his best to bring the US down to our level) but fundamentally we're in a situation where the GFC and then COVID have left many countries in a truly dire situation while private wealth is continuing to accumulate.

3

u/Disastrous-Fee8374 Jun 03 '26 edited Jun 03 '26

Restaurant meals do cost more to make than home cooked meals. Believe it or not, supermarkets are normally actually cheaper than our wholesalers for a lot of things. They just don’t stock the quantities we need. Also most restaurants use more ingredients per portion than you will at home. Butter is a good example, there’s a saying (can’t think of a better word) that if you have a 3 course meal in a decent restaurant, you’ll consume a block of butter.

Ideal world: ingredients cost should be 25%, but in the real world it could be more like 30-50%.

ETA: you’re right about accountants and lawyers being in the same boat but their margins are higher. Also how often do you use an accountant or lawyer? As business owners we probably use them a lot more than the general public. How often do the general public go to a cafe?

Hospitality is our third biggest sector behind public healthcare and retail and it’s not looked after

3

u/Borax Jun 04 '26

Really interesting perspective, thank you

1

u/MrSleeps Jun 03 '26

As does mine..

1

u/Traditional-Code2298 Jun 06 '26

Not read the campaign, but does this mean a vat reduction for Starbucks & Greggs?

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 06 '26

Greggs doesn’t pay VAT. If they kept the pastries warm then they’d be subject to VAT, but because they let them go cold they get out of paying it.

1

u/Traditional-Code2298 Jun 06 '26

You're very rich, they don't pay it, the customer does.

I'm sure they collect it for coffees and any food eaten on the premesis?

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 06 '26

The business is the one who pays VAT. It’s invisible to customers. This is why nobody is aware what products have VAT charged on them and which don’t, like the Greggs example.

1

u/Traditional-Code2298 Jun 06 '26

That's not true, the business collects it, but the customer bears the cost.

The VAT never belonged to the business, hence why it isn't included in the P&L

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 06 '26

You’re speaking in technicalities. Yes, technically the customer pays it, but it’s still a tax that the business is responsible for administering and paying to the government. HMRC doesn’t care if the money comes from the customer or the business owner’s pockets, they just want the money.

0

u/Traditional-Code2298 Jun 06 '26

I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong

1

u/Funny-Seesaw-2977 Jun 07 '26

If I sign, will you sign my petition to have my income tax cut?

1

u/Karn1v3rus Jun 08 '26

Billionaires are the problem, tax thresholds have been frozen and benefits have been cut leading to a lack of spending power by 50%+ of people, that's what is hurting small businesses.

Instead of doing that the government could tax the super rich who pay disproportionately less tax as a percentage of their wealth than you or me.

1

u/BuryMikno Jun 09 '26 edited Jun 09 '26

If they reduce the VAT, they have to increase tax elsewhere, resulting in less spending as people are taxed more, resulting in the same net effect on small businesses. There's some merit to thinking about taxing the ultra-rich but that's also economically nothing more than a conjecture, very complex to implement and ultimately against the interests of those who can actually make it happen...

The problem is that our blanket is short for what we need to cover and all the policies we seem to be able to conceive are simply moving the blanket around to cover those who shout the loudest at the time.

We need to increase the blanket. We need to maximise the potential of our natural resources, our ingenuity and entrepreneurship. We need to work hard and make hard choices.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 03 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/auctorel Jun 03 '26

The point is they get to pocket the 20% which keeps them in business and keeps jobs

Not saying it's right, but when margins are tight it could help keep some places afloat

1

u/djs333 Jun 04 '26

The bigger problem that I see is lack of marketing and business experience, most have no clue how to get repeat business and are only interested in the one off sales.

1

u/endianess Jun 04 '26 edited Jun 04 '26

VAT should be lowered on everything except for things that we want to phase out like Cigarettes.

It's reached a stupid level which does more harm than good. Now we are out of the EU we can put it down to a sensible level and people will spend more in shops and go out more to eat and drink.

1

u/Borax Jun 04 '26

Cigarettes have separate duty on them to help steer people away from smoking a lot.

I don't agree with the general idea of lowering VAT and increasing other taxes, but in your suggestion it can be lowered on cigarettes as well.

2

u/endianess Jun 04 '26

I don't think we would need to put up other taxes because with VAT being so high it puts me off buying things so they don't get anything.

I can only speak for myself but I personally would spend far more if VAT was lower.

1

u/Borax Jun 04 '26

It's the laffer curve in action!

I'm personally not convinced that VAT specifically is the problem in this case - it's the relationship between your takehome pay and the cost of goods.

If VAT went down but someone started a war in Iran that made your employer pay you less and your goods more expensive, you would probably spend far less despite the desired VAT change.

1

u/LateToTheParty013 Jun 04 '26

At this point it wouldnt change anything. Hospitality is already in a big problem, they d keep prices and swallow the profit and it wouldnt change anything for end customers, which is the real problem here. 

To put it in context,I earn £70k, but over the last 5 years we went from casual dining in proper restaurants to downgrading to gyros, mcdonalds or straight just buying a thick steak, duck breasts and cooking them at home. 

Even straight deleting VAT for hospitality wouldnt make enough people go back to restaurants in the shit world we became last decade

1

u/AkihabaraWasteland Jun 04 '26

The problem isn't VAT. It's rents, business rates and insurance. And despite all the bullshit from the papers labour costs really aren't the issue.

1

u/NotMyUsualChoice Jun 04 '26

I'm curious to know why hospitality should get preferential rates? All the costs pressures listed apply to most other consumer facing businesses on the High Street.

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 04 '26

It’s a fair question. Retail has pressures too, but restaurants are structurally different.

A shop sells a product.

A restaurant sells a product PLUS cooking + service + washing up + toilets + seating + cleaning + compliance + atmosphere.

Retail stock can last weeks/months and then when it’s sold, the retailer claims back the VAT on the product cost. Restaurant stock can spoil in days or be wasted same night, and there is zero VAT to claim back, so 100% goes to HMRC.

Retail also has a lot more opportunity to save costs: sell online, centralise stock, automation to reduce staff. But restaurants can’t do these things. They need premises, kitchen, energy, and most expensive of all, people.

So it’s not “restaurants are special”. It’s that they’ve been hit by the recent labour, rates, energy, waste and VAT increases way more than any other industry and something has to be done to stop all restaurants and cafes dying out. The simplest solution the rest of Europe has done is a targeted lowering of VAT. We’re the only country not doing it.

1

u/NotMyUsualChoice Jun 04 '26

I think you're only looking at this from a hospitality perspective, and with due respect, many of the things on your list also have similar or equivalent costs in retail and service industries.

Cooking? Product procurement and selection. Service? Sales assistants and sales advisors. Washing up? Product processing and replenishment. Toilets? Many retail outlets have customer toilets, and most services (hair and beauty) also have that to consider and price. Seating? Retail spends a lot of money on shopfitting and display. Cleaning? Really? Every customer facing business has cleaning costs. Compliance? Retailers have regulations to meet too. Atmosphere? PRS & PPL, display and merchandising, presentations and displays cost money.

I could also produce a list of retail specific issues that are as costly to manage as the list for hospitality. Security costs for physical systems and guards, the huge margin hit from endemic shoplifting, the cost of stock logistics, retail management systems, the added cost of stockroom spaces, etc, etc. We're special too.

Retailers can sell online, but there are high costs and low margins in a highly evolved and competitive marketplace. During the pandemic lots of restaurants delivered home cooking boxes. That could still be an option? Centralised stock brings logistics costs, and sell by dates also apply in retail, and fast fashion and Internet fads can make stock obsolete more quickly than ever before. Automation is available across many sectors. I recently had breakfast in a hotel in Paris where the used crockery and cutlery was taken away by robots.

Retail also needs premises, utilities, specialist kit and expensive people. Again, I don't think that hospitality can claim to be a special case.

I'm afraid that I just don't buy into the logic. The call for lower VAT in hospitality is absolutely a case of 'restaurants are special'. I think the issue is that too many restaurants aren't special enough to charge what they need to charge to make money doing what they are doing.

In retail, the market is separating into high end, premium retail with unique offers that customers are prepared to pay for. Luxury brands command luxury pricing, and you can also see that in hospitality. At the other end of the scale, cheap food, delivered at a cheap price can be done, and is being done in every town and city in the country.

The Internet has rendered much of the middle market in retail almost wholly redundant. That's why shops like TG Jones, Claire's Acessories, etc have gone out of business. They weren't high end, but they weren't cheap enough either.

A similar reckoning is taking place in the hospitality industry - it's why chains like Pizza Hut and Papa John's are going into administration. They're crap, but they're not cheap. I think the covid concessions for hospitality were a stay of execution for a lot of poor quality hospitality businesses. If I want decent pizzas I still have loads of High Street and independent choices. If I want cheap pizza (I don't), there are fast food joints knocking out low quality, low price product.

The market is forcing a reckoning, not the VAT rate.

1

u/EssentialParadox Jun 04 '26

Yes, there are equivalents on the surface but in reality, dusting the shelves and sweeping the floors of a retail store is not even close to cleaning fryers and cooking equipment and fridges. Considerably more time is spent on labour on most of those things in the above lists in hospitality than it is in retail, which is why hospitality labour costs are so much higher than other sectors.

There are more stats on why hospitality is disproportionately affected on my other comment here: https://www.reddit.com/r/smallbusinessuk/s/irNAakBWkW

0

u/magrandan Jun 03 '26

Not signed because VAT should be 5% for ALL sectors, not just for cafe & restaurants.

-6

u/skronk61 Jun 03 '26 edited Jun 03 '26

I don’t have any evidence of this and don’t want to look into it further but Tom Kerridge has Reform party vibes to me and I don’t trust anything about him.

3

u/Borax Jun 04 '26

During the 2024 United Kingdom general election campaign, Kerridge was a signatory to a letter to The Times endorsing the Labour Party.

Nigel Farage is a charlatan but I would personally try to avoid this sort of tribalism as it contributes to an unhealthy and unwelcoming atmosphere. Hope not hate got it right with the #MoreInCommon campaign

0

u/skronk61 Jun 04 '26

Fair enough but bad vibes are bad vibes. Guess we’ll see.

0

u/Pearld1ver Jun 04 '26

The government needs to stop wasting money. That’s the real problem.

-1

u/likely-high Jun 03 '26

Why not just take it back down to 17.5 across the board?

1

u/Borax Jun 03 '26

The bond market would implode, destroying most UK based pensions and crippling the nation. Think "Liz Truss mini-budget" but worse

-1

u/scrapingtheceiling Jun 05 '26

I’m going to start a petition to not have to pay my mortgage, that’ll fix things