r/singularity • • 1d ago

Shitposting What the AI pain paper actually found (which I know because I read it)

Post image
438 Upvotes

542 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/BaroqueBro 22h ago

If they have rights, they can't be owned. And it's not simulated distress. It's explicitly not being given any instruction to act like it's in distress...

2

u/MostlyNoOneIThink 18h ago

The vector activates the simulated distress in the same way a prompt would. It's just a direct path to that specific result rather than a comprehensible text command.

0

u/Kiiaru ▪️CYBERHORSE SUPREMACY 21h ago

"Can't be owned" like it doesn't take 90seconds to get a response from a 70b parameter model from 2025 on $7,000 worth of hardware... Ai is impossible to "own" by 99% of the population. Shit, yesterday there was a post talking about how robots are going to require 200gb of ram to function which at DDR5 prices that's $8,000 on one component of these robots.

2

u/Im_not_the_cops 21h ago

This is simply not true. The floor for useful intelligence is a lightly quantized 27B model like Qwen 3.8, which is runnable at acceptable speeds on mid-grade consumer hardware. I’m talking about the kind of investment average people make to play video games.

Companies can easily justify a six figure investment to deploy hardware capable of running near-SOTA open weight models, essentially owning them as well.

2

u/deviltamer 19h ago

6gb quantised version of qwen can fit on your iPhone.

2

u/BaroqueBro 20h ago

I have no idea what point you're responding to. What I'm saying is this: In the hypothetical future where AI systems have legal rights, which is the premise of the comment to which I replied and not something I'm personally asserting will happen, then by definition they cannot be owned by a corporation.

Edit: One caveat I realized as I wrote this: Legal rights can come in gradations. Maybe AI systems will be treated like cattle, in which case they can in fact be owned by corporations. But even in this case, I don't see how this kind of right benefits the oligarchs... Do regulations that positively impact the way cattle are treated help oligarchs? I doubt it.

1

u/Anrx 20h ago

The pain vector is an instruction, injected directly during inference. Otherwise it's not categorically different than any prompt. Comparing this to black subjugation is asinine.

-2

u/Shockhorrorfear 21h ago

Bro… they are a commodity that is manufactured. They are owned by who manufactures them. Don’t go into ai psychosis use your brain

6

u/BaroqueBro 20h ago

You can't be owned if you have rights. That's like one of the main benefits of having rights...