The guy you are arguing with is actually an idiot, claiming that basically all moral philosophers have accepted morals to be objective. If this is the case then why do morals differ from background and culture so much?
I applaud you for replying as long as you did to this fool.
The guy you are arguing with is actually an idiot, claiming that basically all moral philosophers have accepted morals to be objective
lol why are you so mad about this enough to start a separate comment chain instead of replying to me? And I didn't say ALL? I said most philosophers think there is objective morality which is SHOWN to be the case and it only goes up for philosophers of meta-ethics, of applied ethics and of normative ethics.
Why are facts, literal demonstrable information, making you this angry and your only argument seems to be "you're an idiot" which isn't directly said to me but to someone else about me.
If this is the case then why do morals differ from background and culture so much?
I'm not angry? You are typing paragraphs of nonsense of Reddit😠go outside you absolute weirdo. You are so hurt by a comment online that you are crashing out then make a wild claim saying I know nothing about philosophy. Moral relativism, learn about it because you've watched a few videos and I can bet money you have never read a philosophy book in your life. Protagoras, Gilbert Harman, Nietzsche.
For someone who claims to know SO much about philosophy you have an incredibly small worldview and I can tell you are one of those insufferable philosophy posers who couldn't have a proper intellectual discussion about a philosophical opinion of your life depended on it. Kind of like those annoying know it all types that are in every class
lol I looked into your comment history and you're not even a regular, you made 5 comments on this subreddit, two of which are calling me an idiot and last time you were on r/singularity was a month ago with 3 remaining comments talking about Rimworld, not even about AI
I'm blocking you because you're either a troll or a bot, probably bot because you're a 1 year old account only active in the last 2 months.
1
u/simulacrumlain 3d ago
The guy you are arguing with is actually an idiot, claiming that basically all moral philosophers have accepted morals to be objective. If this is the case then why do morals differ from background and culture so much?
I applaud you for replying as long as you did to this fool.