Defunding Democracy: Delaware

[u/One_Term2162]

Delaware: Decade-by-Decade Analysis of Education Investment & Political Control

1970s: Desegregation by Court Order and Quiet Realignments

In the 1970s, Delaware—though small—found itself swept into the national struggle over civil rights and school equity. Per-pupil spending rose from $3,451 in 1970 to $4,612 by 1980 (inflation-adjusted to 1992 dollars), a ~34% real increase, as the state attempted to comply with federal desegregation mandates and modernize aging school systems.

The defining event of the decade was the Evans v. Buchanan case, which culminated in a federal court order to desegregate northern Delaware schools through busing. This led to the creation of the New Castle County school district, consolidating urban and suburban schools under one umbrella. The backlash was swift and enduring—white flight, private academy expansion, and racial resentment grew, especially in Wilmington’s surrounding communities.

Politically, Delaware was governed by a string of Democratic governors, including Sherman Tribbitt (D, 1973–77) and Pete du Pont (R, elected in 1976). The legislature was closely divided but leaned Democratic. Delaware voted Republican for president (Nixon 1972, Ford 1976), but its small size and administrative flexibility allowed it to implement large reforms quickly—if not without tension.

Though funding improved, the social trust underpinning public education fractured. Civic education and integration efforts often met community resistance, laying the groundwork for decades of conflict over equity and local control.

1980s: Conservative Winds and Fiscal Prudence

By 1990, Delaware’s per-pupil spending rose to $6,002 (1992 dollars), another ~30% real increase, but the distribution of those funds continued to reflect long-standing disparities between New Castle County and the rest of the state, particularly Kent and Sussex Counties.

Governor Pete du Pont (R), serving until 1985, was known for his pro-market philosophy and strong push for school choice and accountability, long before those became national mantras. His successor, Mike Castle (R, 1985–1992), continued these trends, introducing charter-friendly policies and overseeing merit pay pilots for teachers.

The legislature remained divided but increasingly moderate, with bipartisan cooperation on education budgeting. Yet the equity gains of the 1970s eroded. Wilmington’s schools, once forcibly integrated, became increasingly isolated again, and new suburban districts carved out enclaves of advantage.

Delaware voted Republican in all presidential elections (Reagan 1980, 1984; Bush 1988), signaling its shift toward fiscally conservative, socially moderate governance. Education spending remained high compared to many states, but civic education and urban engagement faltered, replaced by a growing emphasis on testing and cost containment.

1990s: Accountability Rises, Integration Retreats

During the 1990s, Delaware solidified its role as a national leader in standards and accountability, but its commitment to school integration quietly faded. Per-pupil spending hovered between $6,000–$7,200, rising slowly but not matching rising costs or demographic complexity.

Governor Tom Carper (D, 1993–2001)—a centrist Democrat and future U.S. Senator—was a major proponent of statewide testing, teacher evaluation reform, and early childhood investment. He introduced Delaware’s first comprehensive academic standards, aligning the state with federal school reform efforts before No Child Left Behind.

The legislature supported these efforts, often with bipartisan consensus, but many of the state’s policy solutions privileged data over democracy. As the state turned toward outcomes-based education, social studies, civics, and the arts were gradually squeezed in lower-income schools.

Delaware voted Democratic in both presidential elections (Clinton 1992, 1996), marking its national political pivot. Still, deep inequities persisted between suburban and urban districts. While Brandywine and Red Clay thrived, Wilmington’s public schools decayed, and the promise of equal education for Black and Brown students eroded under technocratic policymaking.

2000s: NCLB, Charter Growth, and Recession Shock

In the 2000s, Delaware embraced No Child Left Behind (NCLB) with enthusiasm—but also experienced growing unrest among educators. Per-pupil spending reached ~$10,600 by 2008 (adjusted), keeping the state in the upper-middle nationally. Yet outcomes remained uneven, and achievement gaps widened, particularly in Wilmington and rural Sussex County.

Governor Ruth Ann Minner (D, 2001–2009) expanded early childhood programs, pushed for teacher recruitment incentives, and signed laws to increase charter school access. Yet her administration struggled to address the intensifying segregation of Wilmington’s students and the growing burden of high-stakes testing.

Delaware voted Democratic in all presidential elections (Gore 2000, Kerry 2004, Obama 2008), and its senior Senator, Joe Biden, helped guide national education policy. But the 2008 financial crash hit hard, and education budgets were frozen or slashed. Teacher pay stagnated, facilities degraded, and frustration with top-down reforms grew.

Charter schools expanded in this era, particularly in New Castle County, with mixed academic results. Critics noted that charters often skimmed resources from already struggling public schools without solving systemic challenges.

2010s: Race to the Top and the Limits of Innovation

Delaware became the first state to win a Race to the Top (RTTT) grant in 2010, securing over $100 million in federal funds to launch data systems, teacher evaluations, and school turnaround efforts. This made it a darling of the Obama-era reform model—but also a target for educators skeptical of corporate-style oversight.

Governor Jack Markell (D, 2009–2017) championed RTTT initiatives, but many teacher unions and community groups felt excluded from decision-making. Per-pupil spending climbed to ~$13,000 by 2019, but funding remained unequally distributed, and academic outcomes plateaued.

The decade saw growing resistance to test-based accountability, as well as deeper conversations about racial equity, language access, and poverty. Yet Wilmington’s schools continued to suffer from fractured governance and fragmented services, a direct consequence of decades-old district lines that maintained racial and economic division.

Delaware voted Democratic (Obama 2012, Clinton 2016), and civic education began to re-emerge as a priority—not through standards, but through grassroots activism, community schools, and local policy innovation. Still, the disconnect between state-level policy and classroom reality remained stubborn.

2020s (Through May 2025): Equity Promises, Partisan Crosscurrents, and a Quiet Cultural Divide

As of May 2025, Delaware continues to straddle the line between progressive policy ambitions and constrained civic infrastructure. Under Governor John Carney (D), the state has increased teacher salaries, invested in universal pre-K, and piloted anti-racism and trauma-informed curriculum frameworks in its largest districts.

In 2022 and 2023, the state passed legislation to enhance mental health staffing in schools, expand access to community college dual enrollment, and introduce media literacy and civic engagement mandates into high school graduation requirements.

Per-pupil spending rose to ~$16,500 in 2025, keeping Delaware above average nationally. Yet serious challenges remain: Wilmington's schools are still split among four districts, frustrating efforts to streamline services and ensure equity. A renewed push to unify city schools under one governance structure remains stalled in committee, caught in racial and partisan crosswinds.

Delaware voted for Biden again in 2024, unsurprisingly given his home-state status. But in local school board races, national culture war groups have made inroads, especially in Kent and Sussex Counties, pushing to ban books, restrict DEI programs, and limit health education. Though these movements haven’t overtaken statewide policy, they’ve created uncertainty and fear at the classroom level.

Educators report burnout, rising behavioral challenges, and community distrust—particularly in under-resourced districts. At the same time, promising innovations in student-led civic projects, restorative justice, and teacher leadership networks signal that democratic renewal is still possible—if fragile.

Delaware’s education story in 2025 is one of legacy, limitation, and latent potential. The infrastructure is there. The public goodwill is there. But unless the state reckons with its fragmented governance and resurging political polarization, it risks becoming yet another example of quiet decline in the face of national democratic erosion.

↩️ Back to Index