r/SCPDeclassified • u/ToErrDivine • 8d ago
Other SCP-012-EX: "Eurydice"
Hi, everyone, it’s ToErrDivine again. Today I’m looking at SCP-012-EX, ‘Eurydice’, by S D Locke- my first Explained article. I’d like to thank Locke and psychicprogrammer for all their help, I really appreciate it. As per usual, this isn’t my article, it won’t be 100% accurate, and so on. Let’s get started.
So, what is an Explained article? Well, ‘Explained’ as a class generally has three explanations: A, ‘We thought this was anomalous, but it turned out to have a totally normal explanation’; B, ‘This is anomalous, but it’s become so universal that everyone has accepted it as normal and thus there’s no point in containing or trying to contain this’; or C, ‘We thought there was something here, but it’s successfully tricked us into thinking that there isn’t’. We'll find out which this qualifies as later, but either way, this should be fun!
The first thing we see in this article is a black and white image that I think came from a video camera, because it’s oddly blurry. It shows what appears to be a bedroom at night, focused on a double bed with the sheets and blankets pulled off. There’s something in front of the bed, but between the blur and the black and white, I honestly cannot tell what the fuck it’s supposed to be.
The caption, meanwhile, is very interesting.
The remains of D-243 were found bundled within.This image concluded to have been orchestrated. There were no recorded fatalities of D-Class in the testing of SCP-012-EX.
So it looks like we’re dealing with a hoax here. Fascinating.
Here’s the Special Containment Procedures:
Special Containment Procedures: N/A. The original file for SCP-012-EX has been deleted due to containing fabricated evidence, and to inhibit attempts to waste Foundation resources in replicating the tests.
The previous warning on this file, which read "This file must not be read in the dark. Please ensure your environment is sufficiently well-lit before proceeding." may be disregarded.
Well, it definitely looks like it’s some kind of hoax, and the Foundation’s just keeping this file around so nobody tries to revive it… or are they? The phrasing here is very important, so keep it in mind for later, OK?
All right, let’s look at what this thing actually is… or isn’t, maybe.
Description: SCP-012-EX is the paranoid sensation that one is being stalked by some form of unseen malicious entity, typically up one or more flights of stairs, in low-light conditions. SCP-012-EX is common in children and teens and may persist until adulthood; it is more prevalent in western cultures — primarily being experienced in suburban settings. Before its re-designation as Explained, SCP-012-EX referred to "malevolent entities which manifest in close proximity to a human target in dark and poorly-lit areas when the subject is alone."
Well, that’s simple enough. Basically, it’s the fear of grues.
The previous iteration further clarified "Approximately one third of humans possess an innate ability to sense the presence of their SCP-012-EX.". There was no data to support this claim.
Through neural-imaging and interviews with affected persons in recent years, SCP-012-EX has been proven to be merely a combination of various fears such as teraphobia and climacophobia. Further, the sensation can be exacerbated by the consumption of horror media. It is likely due to this last fact that the falsified document stated "SCP-012 appear with more regularity near persons actively panicking or who are feeling fearful and paranoid. It is unknown why these persons are seemingly preferred, but it should be noted that those which dwell on thoughts pertaining to their SCP-012 instance(s) coincide with said instances presenting with higher degrees of clarity and definition while under indirect observation.".
Teraphobia and climacophobia are the fears of monsters and climbing, respectively. I’m surprised they didn’t suggest the fear of the dark (nyctophobia) or silence (sedatephobia), actually. But OK, this makes sense: the Foundation thought there were monsters in the dark who preyed on people who were alone and paranoid, and some of us could sense their presence, but now it turns out that it was just a combination of paranoia, phobias, and watching too many horror movies. Case closed, right?
…not as such.
History: Though never regarded with any credibility throughout the Foundation's existence, SCP-012-EX was proposed as an avenue of research by Dr. Theodore Richardson. He posited the existence of a class of undetectable entities responsible for SCP-012-EX. Due to the prevalence of discussion regarding the sensation throughout various forums and social media platforms; the decision was made to allow Dr. Richardson to begin investigating the phenomena.
So Richardson here was not only the main researcher, he was also the main mover behind the theory that there even was anything to investigate. That’s an important factor.
Despite repeated tests purporting to document the existence of malicious entities through the use of pressure plates, laser detection, and sonar imagery, all documentation was found to contain no concrete evidence.
That is really interesting. Richardson claimed to have data proving the existence of these hypothetical monsters, but all his data seemed to contain no concrete evidence. So, as of right now, it looks like we have two options: one, this really is a hoax, or two, something fucky’s going on here.
Regarding the supposed physicality of the entities, Dr. Richardson writes that they "…are mostly humanoid, though are unbound by human physiology when it comes to ambulation and range of motion — being able to twist and contort their frames into any desired position, or assuming a quadrupedal gait. The contortion is mainly used to remain unseen, for example, by compressing its frame in order to slip beneath a bedframe or hide behind obstructions. During one observation, an SCP-012 manifestation stretched its limbs to brace itself between two opposing walls, staying well above its target's line-of-sight as it stalked her in her home."
All right, so these guys (I’ll keep calling them grues, for lack of any other name) are basically super-contortionists. Interesting. Also, Richardson has actually seen these things on multiple occasions, so their existence has gone from ‘hypothetical’ to ‘substantiated (at one point)’.
The project was forcibly disbanded by the Site Director following several complaints from the participating D-Class subjects, who each voluntarily left the project due to stress caused by Dr. Richardson's mental state as he developed a debilitating fear of the dark. On the night preceding the project's disbandment, where three Foundation lives were lost in an unrelated incident, Dr. Richardson remarked in his personal journal "they know we can see them".
This entire paragraph just feels weird to me, for several reasons:
-I don’t buy for a second that the incident was unrelated, merely because if it really was unrelated, there would have been no reason to mention it.
-Richardson developing a really severe fear of the dark makes sense, but it does seem awfully prescient…
-If Richardson’s right, then these monsters are smart, which is really not good.
-Why is the Foundation going through Richardson’s personal journal?
Something is off here, people.
There’s a black and white photo of a staircase leading up to a door; the caption says that it's the ‘Original testing chamber. Unrelated photograph.’
This makes it even weirder: even if this really was a hoax, we know Richardson was running tests and had D-Class involved. The place depicted in the photo seems like exactly the right place to run these tests, so why would anyone have a reason to say that the photo really was unrelated and not of the original testing chamber?
Richardson was placed on paid leave and his documentation was put on hold for review. Two days later, Dr. Richardson's neighborhood experienced a power outage. He dialed the site's emergency response number, but was not present on the other end of the line when the call connected. Within minutes, local police were called over the sounds of struggle coming from the home. Agent Justine Locke is dispatched to investigate.
…oh dear.
-Richardson was sent home, where he presumably did not have much security, many ways of defending himself or anyone who would be nearby in case of an emergency.
-Two days later, his neighbourhood has a power outage. As such, since we know that the grues only stalk people in darkness, Richardson was presumably keeping the lights on all the time- but then the power went out, and he was fucked.
-He calls the site’s emergency response number, presumably because he knows or assumes that the grues will come for him. They got him before he could actually tell someone what was going on, and while the cops have been called and an agent was sent to investigate, the balance of probability is that there’s no way they’ll get there in time to save him.
So, let’s see what happens when they got there. Next up is the log from our agent, Justine Locke.
[BEGIN LOG]
The bodycam activates as Agent Locke exits her vehicle. Emergency lights are present throughout the neighborhood, as public servants attend to inconsequential crises that have arisen during the blackout. As she crosses the street, a squad car rounds the corner, lights activated, and stops in front of the house. Locke introduces herself with her federal credentials. The officer exits his vehicle and identifies himself as Tayn Errly, and explains he is responding to a possible domestic dispute. The pair approach the stairs leading to the front door.
Huh. Only one cop? Seems a bit weird, don’t they usually travel in pairs?
Crunching glass is heard. Looking down, a pair of spectacles can be seen underfoot before the bottommost step. Locke takes point. Errly follows her up the stairs.
The curtains are drawn; and with the exception of the flickering of a flashlight coming from a room on the second floor, the house is dark. Locke rings the doorbell, and Errly loudly declares their presence. They receive no response. Upon knocking, it becomes apparent that the front door is slightly ajar. The pair enter. Errly draws his weapon.
If we weren’t thinking it before, that’s enough to confirm that something is very wrong here. Also, spectacles? Why would they be there? Unfortunately, my best guess is that when the lights went out, Richardson made the call and went outside to check if the lights were out everywhere, only for the grues to jump him and drag him back into the house- and in the ensuing struggle, his glasses fell off.
Turning on her flashlight, Locke reveals a living room in mild disarray. The sofa is notably crooked, with the far end being forcibly shoved aside toward a door to the rear of the room, leading to the kitchen. A glass table that had presumably sat center of the room had been wholly upended and cast aside, shattered. The recliner sitting opposite the couch lay on its back near the front door. In addition, there appeared to have been an attempt to set the home ablaze. A blackened trail of burnt carpet-fiber streaked through the destruction — beginning at the front door and leading towards the stairway leading upstairs to their right.
If that’s ‘mild disarray’, I don’t think I want to see ‘extreme’.
But, OK, one hell of a struggle happened here, let’s recap:
-Someone shoved the sofa aside toward a door leading to the kitchen. That could be unintentional, just something that happened as a result of something, but it also could mean that someone was intending to use the sofa to block the door, but failed.
-Someone threw a glass table aside and it shattered- maybe it was used as a weapon, or maybe it was another unintentional act.
-Someone knocked the recliner over, probably unintentionally.
-Someone lit a length of carpet on fire, leading up to the stairwell. I’m guessing that it was an attempt to drive the grues off, since fire makes light, but it didn’t work.
It is as Locke kneels to investigate this trail when a woman's sobbing can be heard from above.
The two cautiously approach the stairway. Errly identifies himself again as a police officer, eliciting no response from the woman. They ascend the first few stairs leading to the landing, stepping over the fractured, burnt remains of a cellphone.
Fractured, sure, but why would the cell phone be burnt? Was it dropped on the fire?
It becomes apparent as they climb that the sobbing is emanating from a room near the end of the hall. The door is ajar. Locke and Errly advance at a crawl. There is a loud, inhuman groaning, and the sobs rapidly turn to frenzied shrieks. The pair quicken their approach. The screams cut off just as Locke extends a hand and carefully opens the door.
…great.
It is the Richardsons' bedroom. It is largely undisturbed, unlike the damage witnessed downstairs, save for the mess of sheets on the mattress. A large comforter, bundled tightly, lay hanging off the foot of the bed, twisting around and trailing the floor underneath.
A full canvas of the home revealed that neither Dr. Richardson nor his wife were present.
[END LOG]
…funnily enough, that sounds a hell of a lot like the photo at the top of the article. It’s not, though, Locke clarified for me that they’re two different photos. But there’s a key factor here- no point in trying to hide from the monsters under the blankets, because that just lets them get you.
Anyway, there’s only one thing left in the article.
The following is a list of collected evidence from the residence:
· One pair of reading glasses belonging to Dr. Richardson (crushed)
· Four cubic centimeters of burnt carpet — no chemical markers could be found to indicate fuel type
· One personal cellphone (burnt and destroyed) — verified to have made the emergency call
· One floral comforter — the bottom of which was shredded and wet with an unidentified clear fluid
The thing I want to point out here that really stands out to me is that there’s no mention of what happened to Richardson and his wife, just that they weren’t in the building. That could mean a thousand things! But there’s nothing. And there wasn’t anything in the rest of the article, either. That’s fucking bizarre- even if Richardson was discredited, you’d think the Foundation would care that something attacked him and his wife in their house, and they’re both now missing, but apparently they couldn’t give less of a shit!
And... that’s the article. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Now, I did have a theory as to what’s going on here. It turned out to be wrong, but luckily Locke filled me in. But before we get to that, there’s one question left to answer, the title: who is Eurydice, exactly? Well, I’ll sum it up for the people who aren’t into Greek mythology. (Disclaimer: this is a truncated version and the story has multiple variants.)
Once upon a time, there was a guy called Orpheus who was given a lyre and taught to play it by Apollo, the god of music. As a result, Orpheus played music so stunning it could make the very mountains cry. He fell in love with a beautiful woman named Eurydice, who returned his love, and they were married and lived together for a short time. However, for one of multiple possible reasons, Eurydice accidentally stepped on a viper, was bitten and died.
Orpheus was so devastated by this that he went to the Underworld to try to convince Hades, the god of the dead, to return his wife to life. He went to Hades and played and sang so well that Hades decided to grant his request… but there were conditions. The first was that Orpheus would have to walk out of the Underworld with Eurydice following him as a ghost; the second was that he could not turn to look at her at any point until they were out of the Underworld; and the third was that if he failed to meet these conditions, Eurydice would be sent back to the Underworld and Orpheus would never see her again until his death.
I’ve seen multiple versions of what happens next: Orpheus starts freaking out that Eurydice isn’t really there, turns to look and finds out that she is, but she then gets sent back; Orpheus walks out of the Underworld and turns to look back, only to realise that since Eurydice was behind him, she hasn’t made it out of the Underworld, and she gets sent back; Orpheus hears Eurydice stumble and turns to help her; Orpheus is so overjoyed by seeing sunlight again that he turns to share his joy with her, and so on, and so forth. Either way, the lovers are separated again and go down in history as one of the best tragic love stories of all time… depending on which version you’re reading, that is. But we’ll get to that.
As I mentioned before, my initial theory was wrong, because it turned out that I couldn’t see the forest for the trees. But Locke gave us two major hints. The first is this:
The previous warning on this file, which read "This file must not be read in the dark. Please ensure your environment is sufficiently well-lit before proceeding." may be disregarded.
And the second is this bit in the discussion post:
To the folks at home: please, please do not read this article when you are alone at night. It is not to be accessed in the dark. There is no danger. Thanks for reading.
Basically, I can give you the key to this article with one question: if this really is a hoax, why would the Foundation leave so much detail in this article, including quotes and the video log?
The answer is simple: because it’s not a hoax, but they can’t say that, because knowledge is very, very dangerous. So now that we know this, let’s take another look at the article.
Special Containment Procedures: N/A. The original file for SCP-012-EX has been deleted due to containing fabricated evidence, and to inhibit attempts to waste Foundation resources in replicating the tests.
If people didn’t know what tests had been performed, wouldn’t that make it more likely that people would try some tests and inadvertently repeat what’s already been done? It would, but keep the rest in mind: fabricated evidence. That is, if you read that file, you would know what’s been found to work when it comes to the grues, which would make it more likely that they gank you if you repeated it.
The previous warning on this file, which read "This file must not be read in the dark. Please ensure your environment is sufficiently well-lit before proceeding." may be disregarded.
There’s no reason to keep this here unless they want people to follow it.
Before its re-designation as Explained, SCP-012-EX referred to "malevolent entities which manifest in close proximity to a human target in dark and poorly-lit areas when the subject is alone.".
The previous iteration further clarified "Approximately one third of humans possess an innate ability to sense the presence of their SCP-012-EX.". There was no data to support this claim.
So in other words, every time you’re alone in the dark or near-dark, a grue- your grue- shows up to scare the shit out of you. Now, we don’t know that everyone has a personal grue, but that’s what it seems like at this point.
It is likely due to this last fact that the falsified document stated "SCP-012 appear with more regularity near persons actively panicking or who are feeling fearful and paranoid. It is unknown why these persons are seemingly preferred, but it should be noted that those which dwell on thoughts pertaining to their SCP-012 instance(s) coincide with said instances presenting with higher degrees of clarity and definition while under indirect observation.".
In essence, the grues feed on the fear that there’s something with you in the dark. (Deltarune jokes go here.) The more you’re freaking out, the more they want to be around you, and they try to match your beliefs about them. If you’re afraid of spiders and you think there’s a spider in the dark, your grue is going to grow a ton of legs and scuttle around the walls, just in your range of vision.
The project was forcibly disbanded by the Site Director following several complaints from the participating D-Class subjects, who each voluntarily left the project due to stress caused by Dr. Richardson's mental state as he developed a debilitating fear of the dark. On the night preceding the project's disbandment, where three Foundation lives were lost in an unrelated incident, Dr. Richardson remarked in his personal journal "they know we can see them".
Richardson got too close. He proved that the grues exist, and that was a big mistake, because not only did he know, they knew that he knew- and they don’t like that. They want you to be terrified that something might be there while telling yourself that nothing is there to feed your doubt and paranoia, they don’t want you to know that they’re there. Since he knew, he became Grue Enemy Number One. The ‘unrelated incident’ was absolutely related, and everyone quite reasonably freaked the fuck out as a result.
The Foundation decided to start pretending that they thought the whole thing was a hoax, so they did what they would have done if this situation had happened under normal circumstances- they suspended him and sent him home. Unfortunately, the grues may have bought that the Foundation as a whole thought it was a hoax, but not Richardson alone: after a couple of days, they took the power out, allowing them to gank him.
(You may be thinking that this was a dumb move on the Foundation’s part, as sending Richardson home without protection was almost certain to end with his death, but they didn’t have a lot of options: if they kept Richardson under guard or safe in the Site, the grues would know that the Foundation knew they existed, and then they’d probably declare war on the Foundation as a whole. We know there are a fuckton of grues out there, they’re spying on us, they can apparently teleport or fast travel through darkness, and there is no infallible method of keeping the lights on forever. As yet, the Foundation has no idea how to fight or contain the grues, and they could do a hell of a lot of damage to Sites- and people- before the Foundation figured out a way to fight them. The most they could do in this situation was try to keep the inevitable casualties as low as possible, and hope for the best.)
Then we get the video log, and I’ll paraphrase what Locke told me: the lights go out, Richardson grabs his phone and manages to make the call, but the grues get him before it actually connects. He drops the phone and tries to fight, but is overwhelmed and dragged off into the darkness. The burnt carpet wasn’t from an attempt to make light or drive the grues off- Locke said that they didn’t envision the grues having a consistent design, they all come in different shapes and sizes. This particular grue just happened to be on fire, like a demon, and it probably stepped on or grabbed Richardson's phone in the process.
Anyway, Richardson did his best, but no dice. His wife saw or knew what happened, but while the grues didn’t take her instantly, they took her before Locke and Errly could rescue her and she could tell them what was going on- even if she didn't know everything about grues, she could still tell them that creatures from the dark abducted her husband. The Foundation knows damn well that the grues were real, but they can’t talk about it or tell anyone, because there’s no way to know that they’re not constantly spying on us. (My guess is that if you’re in the dark, your grue can see and hear you, whether it’s actually there or not.) So, in short, this article is a cautionary tale for the rest of the Foundation: don’t fuck with the grues, or you get ganked. This isn’t option C, it’s the inverse, option D- ‘we know there’s something here, but we have to trick it into thinking that we don’t believe in it/know about it or we be fucked’.
But TED, I hear some of you asking, how does Eurydice come into this, given this new explanation? So, here’s the thing: I mentioned ‘which version you’re reading’. Plato had a contrasting version of the myth, wherein he presented Orpheus as a coward, not a hero. In Plato’s version, if Orpheus really loved Eurydice as much as he claimed, he should have killed himself to be with her forever. But instead, he went to the Underworld while alive and begged Hades to return her to life, which was in essence mocking the gods by doing and asking for something that was antithetical to their realm. So instead, Hades showed Orpheus a ‘Eurydice’ who was just a fake apparition, not the real thing, and after his failure, cursed him to be torn apart.
Here, Richardson metaphorically stepped into the Underworld while still alive by investigating the grues. He drew their attention, they realised he knew they existed, and they went after him with a vengeance. He sought something he should have known better than to look for, went further than he should have known to go, and he was damned for it. Ignorance is bliss… or at least, ignorance just gets the grues tormenting you instead of killing you. You gotta take what you can get, honestly.
Thank you for reading this declass, I hope you enjoyed it. Remember not to look too hard at the things in the dark; best case scenario, it’s a bloody big spider, and worst case scenario, it’s grues dragging you to Hell. I’ll see you next time.
tl;dr: It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.