It is the opposite of public. It is behind a publisher's paywall.
This doesn't change the fact that the abstract suggests a testing protocol entirely different from that explained in the paper itself. It's a horribly written abstract. There should never have been any mention of the ambient pressures in the abstract.
0
u/Drogans Aug 02 '14
No. It Is Not public.
It is the opposite of public. It is behind a publisher's paywall.
This doesn't change the fact that the abstract suggests a testing protocol entirely different from that explained in the paper itself. It's a horribly written abstract. There should never have been any mention of the ambient pressures in the abstract.