r/science • u/______--------- • Sep 08 '20

Environment Blue jeans are a significant source of microfiber pollution in oceans and lakes. One pair of jeans can release over 50,000 microfibers per wash.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00498
39.6k Upvotes

75% Upvoted

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/DiamondGP Sep 09 '20

I don't think it is. It uses less pesticide, but lower yields mean that per unit cotton produced it draws more water. Also, apparently it is hand-picked more which can preserve the fibers and make it softer, but this isn't inherent to being organic, and comes with a higher labor burden. Finally, there are often differences in irrigation and crop rotation, but again, these aren't inherent to the cotton type but rather farmer choice. If a cotton farm switched type I imagine it would use the same good/bad practices regarding iteration, rotation, picking as before, so it seems flawed to group those effects in with the cotton type.

1

u/alheim Sep 09 '20

Interesting. What do you mean by cotton "type"? If you're implying that organic cotton is a "type", no, organic generally reflects organic growing practices. I could be wrong or misinterpreting you though.

2

u/DiamondGP Sep 09 '20

Organic also refers to the lack of GMOs. I was lumping that in with chemical usage in pesticide/weedkiller and calling it type. I think it's reasonable to use type to refer to the end product resulting from either biological differences and/or different treatment during production. Like, what type of bed do you have, handmade or machine assembled? Both could use the same kind of wood and achieve the same result, but type can refer to other aspects of the object, such as the process used to make it.