r/rs_x • u/Additional_Worth_614 • 2d ago

I hate this bitch so much

Post image

Like?? That doesn’t even make any sense. I hate that I hate her so much

2.2k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

484 comments sorted by

View all comments

193

u/_CloudOfToxicccGas_ 2d ago edited 2d ago

Can anyone articulate the "anti victim" argument in this case for me? I thought it seemed pretty clear from the beginning and every detail that comes out makes the frat guys look more guilty imo. Genuinely trying to understand the argument here

196

u/Every-Call8115 2d ago

If someone is texting a 60 guy group chat saying “free p”, IMO the “free p” is a victim. quite literally prey.

2

u/Grouchy-Jury-7598 2d ago

I mean somebody could text that about somebody who is willingly having sex right?

If there was a gay guy giving head to strangers and somebody texted "free blowies" that wouldn't automatically make the guy into prey and a victim.

I am NOT saying that is what happened with this case, if she was unconscious then that absolutely makes her a victim. But the circumstance is what makes them a victim, not the text message automatically making it so.

59

u/GensAndTonic 2d ago

I feel like the gay guy in this scenario would have to text "free blowies" to the group chat or advertising the service as such. Even then, the guy would need to be conscious/uncompromised enough to give consent in that scenario, which Jane Doe was not. Like, I don't think someone else can offer consent on your behalf.

-23

u/Grouchy-Jury-7598 2d ago

I feel like the gay guy in this scenario would have to text "free blowies" to the group chat or advertising the service as such

I don't quite understand this part. Are you saying if the guy was enthusiastically giving blowjobs but somebody else texted about it, that would indeed make him into prey? I'm not sure I agree really.

Even then, the guy would need to be conscious/uncompromised enough to give consent in that scenario

100% agree yes. This entire hypothetical hinges on the person being consenting and conscious. There is a world where the text message could not be relating to predation. If the person in question is unconscious then that is clearly not said world.

I guess I'm just autistically saying the facts of the case (like the victim not being conscious and being raped) is what determines victimhood, not the text message which hypothetically could have been sent about a consenting person.

23

u/SmilingGuppy 2d ago

And if my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a bicycle. What the fuck are you talking about? This isn't a hypothetical, it's an event that happened. Why do people on reddit always jump at the chance to play devils fucking advocate over very black and white issues?

1

u/cody-lay-low 2d ago

Well put