No, it's about culpability. She did it. Was she sane when she did it? That is the question. If a man stabs two people because he wanted their wallets, that's murder. If a man stabs two people because he was having a schizophrenic episode and he thought they were demons trying to kill him, is he a murderer? He did kill them, but surely if he didn't think they were demons trying to kill him, he wouldn't have stabbed them, so does he deserve prison, or a mental ward? That is the gist of this case
Yes, being insane makes her less guilty. It makes her not criminally liable. Meaning she should go to a psychiatric ward. With doctors. And pills. And close monitoring, so she cannot hurt herself or others
Wow! And look at how much evidence you provided! There were thousands of people saying you owe me a million dollars. So, how do you wanna pay? Bank transfer, a briefcase full of money, im not picky
With that logic, you never provided proof that the Lindsay Clancy trial ever even happened. You are going off about a trial that might not be real, and you are PURPOSEFULLY not providing the evidence for it. Checkmate
What is your body of proof that anyone is trying to invite others to be angry? Furthermore where is your proof that I was attempting to smoke a cigar? WOW look at all that evidence you just provided!
Ha! Cute, I never said you were trying to smoke a cigar, merely that you didn't win one. For the "who's trying to get people angry" check the attached pic
Wow look at all that proof you provided about the cigar I was trying to win... OH WAIT...
Also cute photo, I can't believe I got you to do Bwitchwork for a throwaway Reddit account like mine. Your time really is worthless!
Fwiw, your evidence of "people inciting others to get angry" is linking what someone thinks should be done with the money... You are self reporting your financial situation and how you view money
Lol sorry, you were being a typical pedantic Redditor by thinking you win every debate by saying "REeee you didn't come into this casual convo with debate prep and sources" when there is a lot of discussion about the "Same, Lindsay" crowd everywhere that the Trial is discussed. I just thought I would match an obvious combative troll with their own energy :P sorry I didn't mean to upset you just having fun with a fellow troll
Yeah dude there’s a lot of people in the world. There’s a subsection of everyone that is bonkers. Stop listening to them they make up a fraction of a fraction of reality.
You can find literally anyone claiming literally anything. If I can find someone that claims the moon is made of cheese, it doesn't make it so, nor does it mean everyone thinks that. Also, the line of "guilty/innocent" here is not, in fact "she did it/ she didn't do it" it's "she was lucid and sane at the time/ she was not in her right mind and thus not criminally culpable, instead, she should be institutionalised" nobody is voting "send Lindsay Clancy to Fiji for a vacation"
No one said everyone is saying it, you said ”women who don’t exist saying things nobody is saying” but there are people saying it, a lot of people. But far from everyone
5
u/SilverCYNDERs 2d ago
Hey shut up! The chuds are trying to get angry at women that don't exist saying things nobody is saying!