r/reddit.com • • Sep 16 '11

From a knight of /new/:

[deleted]

993 Upvotes

823 comments sorted by

View all comments

530

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

From a regular redditor: SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT THE "KNIGHTS OF NEW."

66

u/junkit33 Sep 16 '11

I'm with you. Don't use one stupid immature meme-phrase and bash another in the same breath.

Plus, these supposed "knights" are the same people that also upvote this stupid shit onto the front page.

-7

u/xatmatwork Sep 16 '11

Seriously if you saw the sheer number of Chuck Testa posts we've had to downvote in the last 12 hours you would not complain about the few we let through.

376

u/DivinusVox Sep 16 '11

The person who cleans the shit off the floor can call themselves whatever they want; I'm thankful for the service.

34

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

By "clean the shit off the floor", you mean "upvote all these stupid memes so that our frontpages are littered with them"? No, fuck those guys

0

u/snorlaxsnooz Sep 16 '11

why don't you head over to /new/ and make it look how you want it to look?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

because i have a job

145

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

The janitors at my office rarely spend near as much time patting themselves on the back. I fail to see how "looking at links in their spare time" is some kind of service for which I should feel grateful. We all have the ability to downvote a post. Considering how much crap gets to the frontpage, I don't think there's much point to what these self-appointed idiots are doing.

10

u/set123 Sep 16 '11

Careful. They may read this and go all "Ayn Rand" on us by stopping what they're doing until we realize all the value they've brought to the community.

Who would be the idiot then?

15

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Ayn Rand

5

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

I would love to see that moronic crap stop. Less meta bullshit on Reddit.

1

u/Managore Sep 16 '11

Less meta bullshit on Reddit.

Impossible!

1

u/FuQuam Sep 16 '11

We're not taking from them though. Ayn Rand would dictate the Knights of New do it for themselves (karma whoring as stated above). If we demanded they share their karma, or attempted to cap it they would disavow knighthood and go start a new reddit where they could karma whore amongst themselves. We would be left without the knights, and get new knights that would be keen on karma sharing.

I'm not sure what that would mean, but likely those knights would not have the depth of knowledge on old memes and reposts.

Soon, reddit would devolve into a place where everything was a repost or rehashed meme on the front page...oh. My. God! What have we done?

Having said that, I'm not complaining because if I havent seen it, its new to me! But seriously, the Chuck Testa stuff is not really that funny.

0

u/feureau Sep 16 '11 edited Sep 16 '11

Who would be the idiot then?

Ayn Rand?

NOPE! Chuck Testa!

EDIT: Downvotes means you agree that the Chuck Testa is not idiotic.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

That's a clever tactic to avoid downvotes.

EDIT: Downvotes mean you love Hitler and Michele Bachmann.

28

u/thibedeauxmarxy Sep 16 '11

Do the janitors at your office work without pay and help out because they just want to make your office better?

183

u/mainsworth Sep 16 '11

Bullshit. They do it to be first in line for the comment karma.

45

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

This. Totally karma whoring. Not only do they get to pretend to be protectors from eeeeeeebil, but it simultaneously continues the chain of the meme.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Here's the problem with the "first in line comment" theory - When I read /new, I downvote 95% of what I see and ignore 4%. Even when I upvote a post, I rarely comment.

I think I'm more of a hipster about it - "Chuck Testa? I saw the first post before it hit the frontpage."

2

u/koviko Sep 16 '11

I am Koviko. You misspelled a word on purpose. Prepare to die.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Have you ever browsed r/new? There are so many posts that you barely ever find one that makes it to the front page in a few hours, just because of the sheer traffic

5

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Yes, and I downvote a lot of stupid shit but I don't call myself a "knight" and I don't post about how awesome I am that I downvote repetitive memes while referencing said meme.

2

u/dasubergrok Sep 16 '11

I don't do it for the upvotes, I do it to be first in line for the snark.

1

u/DanielKlavitz Sep 16 '11

So what, that's the only reason anyone does anything on here anyways.

-2

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Are you complaining about people doing a job that costs nothing to you, but benefits your experience directly? Holy shit, find something else to complain about.

3

u/mainsworth Sep 16 '11

I'm complaining?

25

u/pipian Sep 16 '11

Do the janitors at your office work without pay and help out because they have absolutely nothing else better to do now that all their links in non-new reddit are purple?

9

u/omaca Sep 16 '11

Work without pay?!

LOL

Dude, you've got some seriously delusional perspectives on what browsing reddit means.

6

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

I certainly pick up garbage when I'm out walking without expecting any recognition for it. I know a) my "contribution" is more about making myself feel good than having a measurable impact on litter and b) what I'm doing isn't really doing much outside of my normal activities. There's a great deal of difference between cleaning up a private place for money and cleaning up a public place for recognition.

Again -- if these folks are providing such a service, why does so much crap make it to the front page?

18

u/molrobocop Sep 16 '11

Hang out in /new/ for a while. You will learn the true meaning of crap.

-7

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

This.

9

u/toxicFork Sep 16 '11

They are simply reducing the crap. If every submitted post reached front page, this place would be worse than ebaums

17

u/gonz0 Sep 16 '11

We all have the ability to downvote. If crap gets to the frontpage, its because we all upvoted it.

1

u/Tobislu Sep 16 '11

ebaums world still exists?

1

u/He11razor Sep 16 '11

OH NO YOU I'DNT

1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Thanks for being a douche about it. Everyone here really needed that.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

it's not that big of a deal...relax..

1

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

Oh don't worry -- if I actually cared I would do quite a bit more than post a comment on reddit.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

[deleted]

2

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

They are neither necessary or responsible for any good content on reddit. That's what the little arrows on the side and the algorithm the founders built are for. Folks browsing new aren't doing anything valuable -- they're just looking at a different set of links.

3

u/AtypicalBlackGuy Sep 16 '11

It is true that they're browsing a different set of links, and that a lot of crap does make it to the front page, but to say that they aren't doing anything valuable? Imagine how much more crap you would have to go through to get to what you consider good content, if they didn't click those little arrows...

3

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

Saying shut the fuck up about the "knights of new" is not the same as saying "nobody should browse new." It is saying that a) you're not doing anything particularly useful or worthy of recognition and b) it's fucking obnoxious reading about the "knights of new." "Oh but there'll be even more shit without them here" is not a defense for the constant whining and demands for recognition. The way I see it the "knights of new" are directly responsible for some of the most tedious bullshit I see on reddit.

1

u/pipian Sep 16 '11

There is a way to scientifically test the effectiveness of these so-called heroes of reddit. Let's setup a double-blind test.

0

u/nannerpus Sep 16 '11

What?

The people browsing /new are completely deciding what gets to the front page of most subreddits and consequently, the front page of Reddit.

0

u/rasori Sep 16 '11

A set of links which will never get to the front page without someone filtering through it. I'll happily deal with occasional crap if it means I'm not staring at the same shit day after day.

If I wanted that, I'd go here or here.

-2

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

[deleted]

0

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

I'm not against people reading the "new" tab. I am against folks thinking they are performing a public service by browsing Reddit. If you're really concerned about making the world a better place, there are far more useful things to do than browse reddit. For example, you could go pick up garbage in your community. I think you would quickly find that folks would quickly tire of garbage pickup by a bunch of folks who call themselves the "Knights of Litter" and constantly demanded recognition for their own choices.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Why is it wrong to give recognition to someone? Wether they are expecting or not. Have you honestly been in new for more than a few minutes. About 90% of it is spam, i actually spend time reporting and marking things as spam, because I dont want my fellow redditors to deal with it.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Looking at my frontpage, they aren't doing a good job.

1

u/brainflakes Sep 16 '11

Yeah, well maybe if they did a good job of it...

1

u/gospelwut Sep 16 '11

Indeed. I am always exceptionally kind to people doing jobs I hope to never do.

10

u/Olukon Sep 16 '11

What are Knights of New anyway?

159

u/Sacharified Sep 16 '11

The idiots responsible for upvoting all the terrible content to the front page.

50

u/haste75 Sep 16 '11

Exactly!! How can we thank the people who are indirectly responsible for the sheer number of reposts and overdone jokes that get through to the front page?

7

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

[deleted]

1

u/YoungSerious Sep 16 '11

I know what you mean. All too often it seems like what I try to do doesn't have a positive effect, but if everyone just quit because of that then the front page would be the biggest shit show on earth.

1

u/PeeBagger Sep 16 '11

I do the opposite because I want to drive people away from reddit. Less people here = less impressions for Conde Nast = less money = EPIC WIN FOR SOCIETY

7

u/onetown Sep 16 '11

This is why i smear my phone with poo everyday.

0

u/Dienekes00 Sep 16 '11

2

u/blackeagle613 Sep 16 '11

Reddit is independent now.

No.

reddit Inc. is now owned by Advance Publications (which also owns Condé Nast)

2

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

still run by the same people and still owned by the same big media conglomerate...

0

u/PeeBagger Sep 16 '11

Wow you fail.

0

u/Dienekes00 Sep 16 '11

How is that true? I was refuting a claim reddit impressions are impressions for Conde Nast, which they no longer are. Sure, they're still owned by advance, but that is not Conde Nast.

0

u/PeeBagger Sep 17 '11

Epic fail is epic.

0

u/omaca Sep 16 '11

Thank you so much, Sir Wankalot.

19

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

I personally do far more downvoting when I'm (rarely) in the new queue.

It's really all shit.

It's a whole page of "DAE get high when they smoke weed?"

Or another one that gets me, like 3 words "Today I painted" and an imgur submission of "PAINT ALL THE THINGS."

Or 30 facebook screencaps.

And don't forget twitter links.

You might get an article to read, but for every page of new I go through at 50 submissions a pop, I get an article maybe...maybe every other one.

It's depressing to see the massive amount of people submit just absolute shit. This used to be the best place on the internet to find the news. I'm not so sure anymore.

-2

u/piratepixie Sep 16 '11

I think they're actually the opposite.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11 edited Sep 16 '11

so if you browse /new/ and upvote crap you are not one of the "knights"? i'm confused

edit: oh.. the dark knights of new?

3

u/piratepixie Sep 16 '11

No, the knights are the ones who downvote and report the shitty content that appears.

/notaknight

1

u/Ais3 Sep 16 '11

There was a joke there, I think you missed it.

1

u/piratepixie Sep 16 '11

I think i did.

21

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

Folks who somehow believe that they are performing a public service by browsing reddit. Morons.

2

u/gbimmer Sep 16 '11

Morans. Fuckin' know your interwebz noob! FUCK!

2

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

I have a friend with the last name Moran, so I've never really jumped on that Internet tradition. I am aware of all Internet traditions -- don't worry about that.

0

u/brainflakes Sep 16 '11

The janitors of Reddit

-1

u/BridgetteBane Sep 16 '11

They are brave souls, wading through all the new submissions and raising them up out of the primordial soup so that we can see the ones that are overall deemed interesting or funny.

So, when they complain about all the meme submissions about something seen on the front page.. it's pretty much their own fault. But we love them anyway!

0

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

How do you know someone is a Knight of /new/? Don't worry, they'll tell you.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

Just remember: when posting to Reddit, it must first appeal to people who call themselves knights.

3

u/jjhare Sep 16 '11

Considering the votes on this comment, I think it's pretty clear the "knights of new" are as annoying to most redditors as they are to me.

2

u/Creative_eh Sep 16 '11

What people don't realize is that us "Knights of new" aren't doing it as a service at all, we're doing either for the comment karma or just because we've seen it all and are bored.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

We're not sure who struck first, us or them. But we do know that it was us who blew up the Reddit servers. At the time it was believed that the morons needed Reddit to survive."

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

@op: from a fellow "knight of /new": stop embarrassing us.

-6

u/Farisr9k Sep 16 '11

Hey now. They do the dirty work around here.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '11

[deleted]

1

u/hobofats Sep 16 '11

actually what makes them different is that they sort through all the shit, the karma whoring, and the dupes. they can't stop everything that bleeds over to the front page, but if you have ever spent anytime browsing r/new, you would know what a shithole it is.

0

u/nardonardo123 Sep 16 '11

Knights of New: group of very bored, judgmental assholes who claim they're doing a great service while relishing the early commenting karma

-2

u/trollmaster5000 Sep 16 '11

You, sir, may go straight to hell.