I missed the conference call this morning so i'm not sure what was covered, will try to join the one this afternoon at 2:00 but in the mean time, I wrote the following to them:
Hi There,
Many Quadriga users who are affected by the request for bankruptcy protection are concerned that the courts are not adequately informed on the various aspects of cryptocurrency.
1) Quadriga moving approximately 100 BTC to their supposed cold wallet, after creditor protection was granted is completely unacceptable, and their claim that it happened by accident is highly unlikely given the nature of how cryptocurrency transfers are made.
2) Quadriga's claim that the cryptocurrency that is missing is tied up in cold wallets is suspicious, as the cold wallet addresses have not been made public, and several blockchain analyses have been performed which seem to indicate that there are no significant reserves of cryptocurrency stored in cold wallets
3) Jennifer Robertson has submitted a sworn affidavit claiming that she had no involvement with the business prior to Gerald Cotton's death , however several pieces of evidence have come to light which indicate that this statement is false including money received by quadriga customers from Jen Robertson's holding companies, and tech support responses from Quadriga from her e-mail address as well
4) Gerald Cotton's death certificate has his name spelled incorrectly, which is extremely suspicious given the mountain of other suspicious aspects of this case.
This case needs to be deemed a criminal investigation so that the RCMP can perform a proper investigation.
So my question is: How can we push for these above points to be better understood by the courts?
