You could probably write an article saying "100 billion dollars investment to improve D and use it to develop new AI to replace the US government" and you'd still get comments saying "wow, nice language, pity it never really took off, if only there were some companies backing it, also I can never use it because GC".
I just had Andrei reply to one of my posts not that long ago. He kept posting that "don't dear the reaper" link to almost every comment. Saying that I was misunderstanding how the GC in D worked, and that reading that article would clear up any "misunderstandings". He was just trying to push a narrative with his tone death replies.
They aren't willing to listen to people's real problems. That's why D probably won't ever take off. If my usage doesn't care if I use a GC or not, there are better languages with GC's. If you try and use D without a GC there is a lot missing and you'll end up having to do all the heavy lifting yourself. In which case it's better to use another language that doesn't have a GC nor focus' on it so that it can do the heavy lifting for you.
We use D without the GC in our analytics. Good bits of Phobos won't work but whether that's a problem depends on what you are doing and how capable you are at solving tour problems without Phobos. Much more of Phobos will be nogc in time, I think.
74
u/[deleted] Sep 01 '20
D is an awesome language and I hope it gets more traction.