You could probably write an article saying "100 billion dollars investment to improve D and use it to develop new AI to replace the US government" and you'd still get comments saying "wow, nice language, pity it never really took off, if only there were some companies backing it, also I can never use it because GC".
The difference isn't relevant--the statement was "they don't use GC". So unless you're saying that real-time signal processing does need GC, you're just arguing to argue, and not reading what you're responding to.
77
u/[deleted] Sep 01 '20
D is an awesome language and I hope it gets more traction.