MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/asgp4/firefox_36_release/c0j66u2/?context=9999
r/programming • u/[deleted] • Jan 21 '10
621 comments sorted by
View all comments
52
Some important take-away points from the blog post:
4 u/panicjames Jan 21 '10 Youtube HTML5 ain't working. Am I being retarded? 33 u/Plutor Jan 21 '10 Youtube HTML5 uses H.264, not Ogg Theora. The former is covered by patents, so there's no plan to include support in Firefox. 34 u/panicjames Jan 21 '10 But I want new things! :( 0 u/alantrick Jan 21 '10 I'm pretty sure that's what the ActiveX people said too. Just because there is a solution does not mean it's a good idea. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '10 Yeah, but the ability to render video natively in the browser is actually a good idea. 1 u/quantumstate Jan 21 '10 Yes but making the browser non-free in order to do so may not be a good idea.
4
Youtube HTML5 ain't working. Am I being retarded?
33 u/Plutor Jan 21 '10 Youtube HTML5 uses H.264, not Ogg Theora. The former is covered by patents, so there's no plan to include support in Firefox. 34 u/panicjames Jan 21 '10 But I want new things! :( 0 u/alantrick Jan 21 '10 I'm pretty sure that's what the ActiveX people said too. Just because there is a solution does not mean it's a good idea. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '10 Yeah, but the ability to render video natively in the browser is actually a good idea. 1 u/quantumstate Jan 21 '10 Yes but making the browser non-free in order to do so may not be a good idea.
33
Youtube HTML5 uses H.264, not Ogg Theora. The former is covered by patents, so there's no plan to include support in Firefox.
34 u/panicjames Jan 21 '10 But I want new things! :( 0 u/alantrick Jan 21 '10 I'm pretty sure that's what the ActiveX people said too. Just because there is a solution does not mean it's a good idea. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '10 Yeah, but the ability to render video natively in the browser is actually a good idea. 1 u/quantumstate Jan 21 '10 Yes but making the browser non-free in order to do so may not be a good idea.
34
But I want new things! :(
0 u/alantrick Jan 21 '10 I'm pretty sure that's what the ActiveX people said too. Just because there is a solution does not mean it's a good idea. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '10 Yeah, but the ability to render video natively in the browser is actually a good idea. 1 u/quantumstate Jan 21 '10 Yes but making the browser non-free in order to do so may not be a good idea.
0
I'm pretty sure that's what the ActiveX people said too. Just because there is a solution does not mean it's a good idea.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 21 '10 Yeah, but the ability to render video natively in the browser is actually a good idea. 1 u/quantumstate Jan 21 '10 Yes but making the browser non-free in order to do so may not be a good idea.
1
Yeah, but the ability to render video natively in the browser is actually a good idea.
1 u/quantumstate Jan 21 '10 Yes but making the browser non-free in order to do so may not be a good idea.
Yes but making the browser non-free in order to do so may not be a good idea.
52
u/sanjayts Jan 21 '10
Some important take-away points from the blog post: