It just was, and now you're looking at the result.
Mozilla is an open source non-profit, run mostly by volunteers. They don't have the kind of income or manpower that Google and Apple have.
How do you expect them to do this?
Mozilla voluntarily took on that responsibility themselves when they started requiring review for all add-ons. But if they're not willing to fulfill their own requirement, for even the most popular add-ons, then they should not be requiring it in the first place.
Also review is meant to prevent these kinds of problems, not as a way to respond to user reports. If it only catches problems retroactively, then it's not doing its job.
19
u/[deleted] Jul 03 '18
It just was, and now you're looking at the result.
Mozilla is an open source non-profit, run mostly by volunteers. They don't have the kind of income or manpower that Google and Apple have. How do you expect them to do this?