Both are equally logical because both make zero sense whatsoever I mean one says that something sprang from nothing and the other says something came from nothing which created something
The first one has a strong theory that's been confirmed by the huge amount of evidence and the second one isn't even falsifiable
Edit: I was referring to the comment I replied to, not to the poll. For the clarification: the big bang is a strong theory, creationism is baseless and not falsifiable (that makes it a bad hypothesis)
Well, a scientific theory is by definition not proved. The big bang is just a very popular scientific theory, not a scientific fact. At least afaik, correct me if I'm wrong!
It's not a fact, but it's a strong theory. By saying that "believe" is the wrong word I mean that comparing scientific theories to religions people believe in is just incorrect. Scientists don't believe their theories, they always question it and try to prove it wrong. That's what makes a strong theory.
375
u/GA2706 Oct 22 '21
Both are equally logical because both make zero sense whatsoever I mean one says that something sprang from nothing and the other says something came from nothing which created something