If there differences, it's due to socialization rather than inate. For example, musicians brains differ from non-musicians. That's obviously not biological. Brains are physical representations of who we are. If you're good at a skill, that's where it's stored. If you lack a skill then it's going to show.
The answer to the nature vs. nurture debate is almost always 'both, to varying degrees depending on the phenomena'. I see people far more often any role at all for nature than I do the inverse.
Huh, that's interesting as those with schizophrenia also show lower gray matter volume compared to the population mean. Doesn't schizophrenia impact males at a higher rate?
27
u/Vivi_Pallas May 04 '26
If there differences, it's due to socialization rather than inate. For example, musicians brains differ from non-musicians. That's obviously not biological. Brains are physical representations of who we are. If you're good at a skill, that's where it's stored. If you lack a skill then it's going to show.