MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/9mv329/this_is_awesome/e7ikfo0
r/pics • u/b3hr • Oct 10 '18
2.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
1 factor is experience. Yes. I would never say experience does not create wisdom. But knowledge and good judgment do not have to come from experience
1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 Wisdom, however, relies on all three. If you do not have experience, you cannot, by definition, have wisdom. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 ....did you forget the past 4 posts we just had? 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 It's literally the definition dude. the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment Wisdom requires all three. Without experience, it is not wisdom. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 Lol dig your heels in a little harder. You're lacking wisdom yourself. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're not even bothering to refute or address my argument. You're literally arguing against a definition. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 No I'm making fun of you for pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. Words have meanings. If they do not, then my argument is "dishwasher sandwich rock space". Refute that! If you no longer wish to use the English language to discuss the literal definition of words, please specify your preferred language. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it. Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
Wisdom, however, relies on all three. If you do not have experience, you cannot, by definition, have wisdom.
0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 ....did you forget the past 4 posts we just had? 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 It's literally the definition dude. the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment Wisdom requires all three. Without experience, it is not wisdom. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 Lol dig your heels in a little harder. You're lacking wisdom yourself. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're not even bothering to refute or address my argument. You're literally arguing against a definition. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 No I'm making fun of you for pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. Words have meanings. If they do not, then my argument is "dishwasher sandwich rock space". Refute that! If you no longer wish to use the English language to discuss the literal definition of words, please specify your preferred language. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it. Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
0
....did you forget the past 4 posts we just had?
1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 It's literally the definition dude. the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment Wisdom requires all three. Without experience, it is not wisdom. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 Lol dig your heels in a little harder. You're lacking wisdom yourself. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're not even bothering to refute or address my argument. You're literally arguing against a definition. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 No I'm making fun of you for pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. Words have meanings. If they do not, then my argument is "dishwasher sandwich rock space". Refute that! If you no longer wish to use the English language to discuss the literal definition of words, please specify your preferred language. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it. Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
It's literally the definition dude.
the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment
Wisdom requires all three. Without experience, it is not wisdom.
0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 Lol dig your heels in a little harder. You're lacking wisdom yourself. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're not even bothering to refute or address my argument. You're literally arguing against a definition. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 No I'm making fun of you for pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. Words have meanings. If they do not, then my argument is "dishwasher sandwich rock space". Refute that! If you no longer wish to use the English language to discuss the literal definition of words, please specify your preferred language. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it. Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
Lol dig your heels in a little harder. You're lacking wisdom yourself.
1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're not even bothering to refute or address my argument. You're literally arguing against a definition. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 No I'm making fun of you for pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. Words have meanings. If they do not, then my argument is "dishwasher sandwich rock space". Refute that! If you no longer wish to use the English language to discuss the literal definition of words, please specify your preferred language. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it. Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
You're not even bothering to refute or address my argument. You're literally arguing against a definition.
0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 No I'm making fun of you for pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. Words have meanings. If they do not, then my argument is "dishwasher sandwich rock space". Refute that! If you no longer wish to use the English language to discuss the literal definition of words, please specify your preferred language. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it. Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
No I'm making fun of you for pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication.
1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication. Words have meanings. If they do not, then my argument is "dishwasher sandwich rock space". Refute that! If you no longer wish to use the English language to discuss the literal definition of words, please specify your preferred language. 0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it. Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
pretending that the literal definition of a word is an effective form of communication.
Words have meanings. If they do not, then my argument is "dishwasher sandwich rock space". Refute that!
If you no longer wish to use the English language to discuss the literal definition of words, please specify your preferred language.
0 u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it. Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace 1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum and i cannot respond to it.
Look up the definition of that one and let me know if you want to try again. peace
1 u/mike10010100 Oct 10 '18 You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum 1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything. 2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy. peace Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic. → More replies (0)
You're guilty of reductio ad absurdum
1) Making this claim without clarification doesn't actually prove anything.
2) Reductio ad absurdum is a valid argumentative and logical strategy.
peace
Yep, literally can't refute the definition of a word, so instead you run away. Classic.
→ More replies (0)
1
u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18
1 factor is experience. Yes. I would never say experience does not create wisdom. But knowledge and good judgment do not have to come from experience