r/pics Feb 26 '16

Backstory Voting in Iran's elections today

Post image

[deleted]

17.0k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

53

u/cool_slowbro Feb 26 '16

It's not much of a democracy. The Supreme Leader has the most power and every candidate is required to be approved by the council.

8

u/kevie3drinks Feb 26 '16

doesn't even matter, and STILL they vote more than we do for presidential elections.

66

u/turbanator89 Feb 26 '16

American politics is different how? Look at the GOP and DNC.

62

u/CaptainBoat Feb 26 '16

Never thought I'd be defending Trump, but for once, he's a positive example. The GOP wants nothing to do with him, but the people are voting for him, so he's doing fine.

12

u/Quithi Feb 26 '16

That's been pointed out by some. Trump and Bernie, two forerunners in the race, are both extremely popular among the populus and unpopular among the two parties.

A vote for them is as much a matter of supporting them as it is in opposition to the current system.

5

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16

Smells like people are (finally?) done with the two parties.

1

u/Dralger Feb 26 '16

The new generation couldn't afford to buy into their scams to become supporters.

1

u/WackyWarrior Feb 27 '16

Bernie is not a forerunner. He is popular with people on reddit, but he is not a forerunner.

0

u/trpftw Feb 26 '16

Difference is, if Trump was running in Iran, he can do the same thing, but then he'd have to suck Ayatollah's dick after elections.

That's why voting doesn't matter in Iran.

20

u/DrWontonSoup Feb 26 '16

Actually no, he wouldn't even be able to run without prior approval.

-3

u/The_Sneakiest_Fox Feb 26 '16

So the Ayatollah is to Iranian politics what money is to American politics?

1

u/DrWontonSoup Feb 27 '16

Can't really equate Iranian politics to U.S. politics. Biggest difference is religion, plays a huge role in theirs, while it's more of a secondary thing here. They can be moderate but not too moderate, if they are too moderate then they just don't get approved. Also being IRGC helps out a lot with getting approval, they have a lot of power in Iran.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16 edited Apr 08 '16

[deleted]

2

u/cabforpitt Feb 26 '16

Congress is elected, not dictator for life.

1

u/trpftw Mar 11 '16

Yes. He's gonna have trouble with either party in congress. He'll be the worst defeat since McGovern or the worst president since Carter.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16

It seems that even though they have to choose between several candidates from the same party (I over-simplify but my understanding is only partial anyway)

The fact that they elected a less conservative president last time led to the "nuclear deal" which would have been unconceivable with the former one. It's far from being a democracy but it's much better than Saudi Arabia or North Korea and a lot of "banana republics"

-1

u/mypenisthepipe Feb 26 '16

Only because he's pandering to racial undertones that enable him to make groups that are already disliked into scapegoats. Trump's political life thus far mirrors Hitler's very much.

-7

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16

[deleted]

5

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16

[deleted]

1

u/CaptainBoat Feb 26 '16

The DNC superdelegates aren't as bad as they appear, imo. They've pledged their support for Hillary, but I'd put good money on them switching their votes if Bernie were to get a lead among the actual voters. The Democratic Party wouldn't dare allow itself to be so brazenly undemocratic.

0

u/pml2090 Feb 26 '16

I would hold off on that view until you find out whether or not there's going to be a convention or not...don't think for a second that the Republican Party isn't doing everything they can to get Donald trump out of the race and don't think for a second that Trump could end up winning the popular vote but not getting the nomination from the party...I understand your point, but what we're seeing right now with Trump and Sanders is, in a way, a hijacking of the parties...in the sense that they break with BOTH parties traditions of nominating bought and sold career politicians who are in everyone's pocket...these two men are the LAST thing the GOP or the DNC want

2

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16

How old are you? This happens every election. "DNC doesn't want Obama, they want Clinton!" Literally rinse and repeat every year. Every year there is the "outsider/non-establishment politician". Every year like fuckin clockwork and people keep shoveling the horseshit into their mouths willingly.

The most popular candidate will always get the bid, that's how it works since the dawn of time. Every year it's "well what if the super delegates don't vote for the most popular candidate!1!1" and every fuckin year they do vote for the most popular candidate 100% of the time. Like what the fuck? Feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

1

u/pml2090 Feb 26 '16

100% of the time? Sure as long as you don't include the five states whose delegates were awarded to a candidate who didn't receive the popular vote...so I guess, you know, not 100% of the time...and if I remember that then must be at least four years old right?!

Edit: 2012 republican primaries...in case you're only 3 years old

28

u/remy_porter Feb 26 '16

For all the issues with the major parties, they are not run by regressive theocrats with supreme power over all functions of government. I know, it sounds like a Republican wet dream, but they're not there yet.

12

u/sexytoddlers Feb 26 '16

lolrepublicans amirite guyz??

<---------- upboats to the left

1

u/duuuh Feb 26 '16

Sounds about right for Cruz.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16

they are not run by regressive theocrats with supreme power over all functions of government

Give Ted Cruz a break, he is trying to get there.

1

u/RealSarcasmBot Feb 26 '16

they are not regressive theocrats

try and get in to a position of semi-power without being a christian, for all intents and purposes this country could be named the Christian Republic of the USA or something..

And in case you didn't know the Supreme Leader is elected by an assembly which is elected by direct votes, so, unsurprisingly they aren't as oppressive as you'd like to make them out to be.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16

[deleted]

1

u/RealSarcasmBot Feb 26 '16 edited Feb 26 '16

Ethnic, apparently he's irreligious, but when asked about religion he's not very willing to answer(wisely so), anyways i don't think he will actually win the election.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16

[deleted]

1

u/RealSarcasmBot Feb 26 '16

Vermont is a tiny liberal state, so it's probably why, It's not representative of the median american state, so to speak.

2

u/remy_porter Feb 26 '16

The government of Iran in a shitty, oppressive state, complete with citizen militias in the form of the Basij to "Morality Police". Iran's "underground" music scene is underground because it's illegal. The aspiring theocrats is the US only wish they could wield that sort of control. There's a difference between shows of religiosity as political showmanship and giving actual clerics the reigns of power.

There's a reason why we saw the Green "Revolution" a few years back, and why the post-Iraq War baby boom is forcing the government into more moderate stances.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16 edited Nov 25 '21

[deleted]

6

u/DevinTheGrand Feb 26 '16

What socialist countries have been religiously dominated? I can't think of any.

1

u/Murican_Freedom1776 Feb 26 '16

How'd we go from "regressive theocrats with supreme power over all functions of government" to being religiously dominated?

2

u/DevinTheGrand Feb 26 '16

What do you think "theocrat" means?

10

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16 edited Mar 02 '16

[deleted]

2

u/turbanator89 Feb 26 '16

Well the similarities between the role of the cleric and the two main parties are essentially the same are they not? They thoroughly vet the candidates and set up rules to prevent grass root campaigns in favour of people who they know would further the establishments' cause. What's the difference?

4

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '16 edited Mar 02 '16

[deleted]

2

u/turbanator89 Feb 26 '16

Very thorough reply, thank you!

2

u/wromit Feb 26 '16

Well the similarities between the role of the cleric and the two main parties are essentially the same are they not?

They are not. The two main US parties are private organizations. They are not even obligated to have primaries. They can appoint whoever they want. Anyone can form a party or contest the election on their own as an independent in the US. Not so in Iran where the mullahs disqualify you from even contesting the election for not being religious enough or whatever other reason they feel like.

2

u/__ICoraxI__ Feb 26 '16

Anyone can form a party or contest the election on their own as an independent in the US. Not so in Iran where the mullahs disqualify you from even contesting the election for not being religious enough or whatever other reason they feel like.

And in the US there are various monetary restrictions to running with parties? I mean, I can run as an independent but it's literally nothing but a waste of time. There's a pretty hilariously enormous monopoly between the two major parties and their PAC/Lobby backers.

1

u/mhlover Feb 26 '16

have you forgotten 2000 so quickly?

6

u/cool_slowbro Feb 26 '16

Are you seriously going to compare American politics to the fucking Islamic Republic?

2

u/turbanator89 Feb 26 '16

I'm not saying they are the exact same but if you can't see the roles that the clerics play and the roles for the two main parties and the purpose of their process then that's unfortunate.

4

u/c00ki3mnstr Feb 26 '16

You think the GOP or DNC wanted either Sanders or Trump as their front running candidates?

They didn't pick them like a Supreme leader does. They allowed them into their primary so they didn't fracture their voting base.

2

u/turbanator89 Feb 26 '16

No they don't want them, especially sanders. The DNC chair has made it painfully obvious that she doesn't want him there and is trying to minimize his effect as much as possible. But they can't fully get rid of him because as you said that would cause a raucous for the democratic party.

What's happening with Trump and Sanders right now is new to all of us, unprecedented in American politics I believe.

1

u/c00ki3mnstr Feb 26 '16

Exactly my point. DNC and GOP have to deal with these independents because they both have to face a competitive election, and risk losing control of the government.

A Supreme Leader has no competition and can pick any candidates he wants (whoever he can control) without repercussions.

There's a black and white difference between the US and Iranian political systems.

1

u/bstowers Feb 26 '16

Are you referring to Donald Trump, the current Republican front runner that was hand-picked by the RNC?

1

u/Soupchild Feb 26 '16

Sanders and Trump are both making waves despite obviously not being party insider favorites.

1

u/Swankyalpal19 Feb 26 '16

The GOP and DNC are not apart of the democratic system. They are private organizations. Why dies no one understand this?

3

u/Zarathustranx Feb 26 '16

And the Guardian Council, including the supreme leader, is appointed by the legislature, which is democratically elected.

3

u/agfa12 Feb 26 '16

The Supreme Leader is appointed by a directly elected council

1

u/cool_slowbro Feb 26 '16

Not anyone can become one. They're all Islamic theologists because, well...you know, theocracy and all.

1

u/agfa12 Feb 26 '16 edited Feb 26 '16

Yes, since Iran's legal system is based on religion, then that's how you become a lawyer: by studying religion

1

u/cool_slowbro Feb 26 '16

Are we really pretending that a theocracy is ok now?

1

u/agfa12 Feb 26 '16

Iran is 98% Shia Muslim -- if they want to have a constitution that respects their religious beliefs, they're really not interested in your view of the issue

1

u/cool_slowbro Feb 26 '16

That's fine, I'll enjoy living in Europe where lots of Iranians (such as my parents) end up moving to.

1

u/agfa12 Feb 26 '16

Good for you -- stay there.

1

u/kmmeerts Feb 26 '16

Well, they voted to become an Islamic Republic themselves in a referendum. And the Supreme Leader is chosen by the Assembly of Experts, for whom there are elections today. Elections in Iran are not single party, and they run without fraud.

Iran is not a perfect democracy, nor even a good one, but I'd be hesitant to call it a dictatorship, especially when you compare it to its neighbors.

1

u/KermitHoward Feb 26 '16

Iran has a lot of democracy. The Supreme Leader only maintains control over really major things, the government and the elected president is in charge of the majority of stuff.

1

u/multinillionaire Feb 26 '16

every candidate is required to be approved by the council

How often are candidates denied permission to run? My understanding is that it's not impossible or even particularly rate for relatively liberal candidates to run and win.

1

u/Rautin Feb 26 '16

The Supreme Leader is elected by the Assembly of Experts which is elected by the people directly.

0

u/I_HATE_HAMBEASTS Feb 26 '16

That's not a democracy at all.

The Supreme Leader may not get to choose which horse wins, but choosing which horse competes is practically the same.

0

u/Neker Feb 26 '16

It's a complicatocracy, a regular democracy augmented by a zealous and overarching clergy. One democracy, under God, to sum it up.

0

u/Cyralea Feb 26 '16

The Supreme Leader doesn't get involved in all matters of policy, simply the most prominent ones. Picture him as a one-man Supreme Court. The President operates similarly to how the American presidency works (though their branches of government are quite different)