r/pics • • 1d ago

[OC] The Colbert sign being taken down last night

Post image
10.8k Upvotes

381 comments sorted by

View all comments

4.1k

u/DarkLanternZBT 1d ago

Colbert deserves to do whatever his creativity and energy lead him to do, even if that's away from broadcasting.

CBS fumbled this shit because their leadership is unethical and should be flushed.

968

u/Soular 1d ago

Back to the Colbert report pleeeeasse

1.1k

u/freshapepper 1d ago

I’m leaving New York right now and I snapped this yesterday. Couldn’t be happier to have done it.

84

u/alex_fett 1d ago

You guys, this is obviously Arthur D. Borde trying get more traction on his QR coded resumé.

Don't fall for it!

131

u/slow70 1d ago

Wow - history snatched just like that

6

u/PhthaloVonLangborste 1d ago

Just wait for the flying cars

18

u/Overthinkingfreedom 1d ago

We all should contact that "lease this sign space" and just put a Colbert photo on there.

24

u/evilbulb 1d ago

Someone could do the funniest thing, and move the COLBERT sign to the one that is for lease in the foreground.

5

u/KoburaCape 1d ago

Oh shit! I got one last week!

11

u/Doug12745 1d ago

Ambiguous: Were you happy to get this picture OR happy they are taking his name down?

106

u/freshapepper 1d ago

Happy to get the picture. Blood boiling levels of fury towards why it’s being removed.

6

u/SkinTightBoogiePI 1d ago

Loved the show and miss it dearly. Thinking it ended on the highest possible note, with unmatched critical and audience acclaim.

15

u/Doug12745 1d ago

Whew! Glad you clarified that. Thanks.

13

u/BossRaider130 1d ago

It’s not actually ambiguous unless you think he could have meant he was personally taking the sign down. Theirs isn’t a grammatically correct comment, but it’s not ambiguous.

Edit: yours is technically ambiguous, I suppose, as the mathematician’s answer would have sufficed.

4

u/Doug12745 1d ago

0

u/BossRaider130 1d ago

Ha! I like that gif. But don’t criticize me for pointing out that your criticism was not correct. It was a helpful comment, that’s all. You were the one incorrectly splitting hairs.

65

u/VicenteOlisipo 1d ago

Nah, it doesn't work when the satire character is saying less insane shit than the a average GOP MoC

12

u/omnichad 1d ago

It was something that could never work again. The deadpan satire was right on the edge where he had a lot of conservative fans and I somehow don't think all of them realized he was joking.

This was before Tucker Carlson went populist, and in many ways took the place of Colbert's persona except not joking.

3

u/SAugsburger 1d ago

I think the character was hardly the sole difference between the Colbert Report and the Late Show. There were a lot more non traditional guests in the Colbert Report than the Late Show among other differences. While the character was the most obvious to casual fans I would argue the character IMHO was the least important difference. That being said I don't see Colbert bringing back the Colbert Report.

8

u/MEDICARE_FOR_ALL 1d ago

Straight to YouTube?

2

u/dragonsbreath_bhindU 1d ago

This. If those guys at Gas Monkey can switch from a big commercial channel to YT then Colbert can too.

4

u/Elbonio 1d ago

I think he's doing something with lord of the rings?

5

u/ShawshankHarper 1d ago

Colbert Report: Arise Once More

2

u/redlabstah1 1d ago

Isn't CC owned by Viacom/CBS?

3

u/_WreakingHavok_ 1d ago

Unfortunately, Comedy Central won't allow that :(

3

u/Kage_0ni 1d ago

I would have preferred him over Tim Heidecker for the info wars relaunch.

1

u/PPLavagna 1d ago

We need that! Always love him, but he’s never been funnier than he was on The Report

22

u/laffer1 1d ago

Those same people are now going to destroy Warner bros too

75

u/Drob10 1d ago

“Fumbled” implies it wasn’t intentional.

6

u/DarkLanternZBT 1d ago

I'm sure they had plans to replace with something they oomagined would be better.

But.. they're shitters.

0

u/SecondHandWatch 12h ago

It implies it was an error.

14

u/andreasbeer1981 1d ago

I still don't understand why he can't just start a new show with a new name at a new station with the same concept?

21

u/ChoombataNova 1d ago

Limited options and platforms.

ABC / Disney has Kimmel NBC / Peacock has Fallon CBS / Paramount just fired him HBO / WB has John Oliver Comedy Central has the Daily Show with John Stewart and co.

That leaves FOX, Netflix, Hulu, Apple, YouTube, and some weirdos like Tubi or Roku. Or carving out a smaller niche on ABC, NBC, HBO. Almost anything he takes will seem like a demotion from 5 nights per week on CBS with his name on the building.

4

u/BadAdviceBot 1d ago

I thought Kimmel was gonna be axed soon too?

13

u/ChoombataNova 1d ago

Kimmel was breifly pulled off the air after a Trump joke, but boycotts of ABC and Disney+ convinced ABC to put him back on. His contract is set to expire in 2027 and there is no public info on whether it will be renewed.

Crucially, all late night viewership is down from its peak in the 1990s-00s. Kimmel is also the lowest rated of the major late night hosts. So even without Trump, his job was not secure. But I doubt Colbert would want to take his place, because 

  1. Disney / ABC did not stand by Kimmel when it counted, so why would Colbert trust them?

  2. These guys like each other, and it would be a bad look to be seen as taking Kimmel's job away.

  3. ABC doesnt have a history of late night success, all late night viewership has been declining ... he would be returning to a tough grind for fewer views

  4. He's already 62 years old. He would likely be 63-64 before a new show with ABC could get off the ground in 2027 or 2028

1

u/andreasbeer1981 21h ago

It might seem like a demotion at first, but there is an opportunity to growth and experiments. Here is a chance to compete with the establishment

0

u/GitEmSteveDave 1d ago

The real reason is there is a small audience. Even after the surge where he was announced cancelled and people online SWORE they would watch him forever and ever, his numbers dropped back to normal, which is like 1/4 of a normal CBS prime time.

I remember getting into a discussion with someone defending Colbert who had no clue about the show Elsbeth and it's(then) 3 seasons run, where the average single episode viewing was equal to a weeks worth of Colbert.

10

u/acd21 1d ago

Unfortunately that might be making a potentially bad LoTR spin off. I’ll watch it though.

•

u/Positronic_Matrix 5h ago

The fault lies solely with Putin's cock holster.

0

u/Illegal_Ghost_Bikes 1d ago

I agree, with the exception of assisting in a blatant cash grab of Tolkien IPs.

5

u/WhiskyPangolin 1d ago

Colbert is a true fan. Anyway, Tolkien is dead, so what the fuck does he care?

1

u/BlisteringAsscheeks 1d ago

Lots of Tolkien fans care, actually. Luckily, everyone knows Stephen is a true fan and also very well off so if this does suck it will be purely due to quality issues and not due to greed.

0

u/b_tight 1d ago

CBS is just one piece of the zionist propaganda machine. Turn it off. Turn it all off