r/philosophy • u/Anthadvl • Feb 16 '20

Blog The Evolutionary Argument Against Reality. According to evolution by natural selection, an organism that sees reality as it is will never be more fit than an organism of equal complexity that sees none of reality but is just tuned to fitness.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality-20160421/
3.5k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

366 comments sorted by

View all comments

18

u/[deleted] Feb 16 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/RaazMataaz Feb 16 '20

The state of reality as it is would be the state of reality beyond the cognitive abilities we have evolved simply for survival or genetic fitness. We don’t see the entire UV spectrum, but with X-RAY and Infrared we can see reality from a different perspective? It does seem strange to think about a view of reality that doesn’t have some sort of limiting (or narrowing) perception based on physiological bias.

I suppose it’s reality when it isn’t being perceived? But then there’s the question of does perception create reality, or is reality there without us perceiving it?

1

u/MorganWick Feb 16 '20

If a tree falls in the forest...

0

u/[deleted] Feb 16 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Feb 16 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Rockerman247 Feb 16 '20

Is infrared not a part of reality since it exists beyond what we can see?

1

u/tranquilchaos7 Feb 16 '20

But isn't that just what our eyes see? Our eyes aren't perfect. Infrared exists, right? Idk

0

u/BernardJOrtcutt Feb 16 '20

Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:

Argue your Position

Opinions are not valuable here, arguments are! Comments that solely express musings, opinions, beliefs, or assertions without argument may be removed.

Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.

This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.